Creating Shared Understanding in Heterogeneous Work Groups: Why It Matters and How to Achieve It

Shared understanding has been claimed to be crucial for effective collaboration of researchers and practitioners. Heterogeneity in work groups further strengthens the challenge of integrating understanding among diverse group members. Nevertheless, shared understanding and especially its formation are largely unexplored. After conceptualizing shared understanding, we apply collaboration engineering to derive a validated collaboration process module (compound thinkLet "MindMerger") to systematically support heterogeneous work groups in building shared understanding. We conduct a large-scale action research study at a German car manufacturing company. The evaluation indicates that with the use of MindMerger, team learning behaviors occur, and shared understanding of the tasks in complex work processes increases among experienced diverse tool and dye makers. Thus, the validated compound thinkLet MindMerger provides designers of collaborative work practices with a reusable module of activities to solve clarification issues in group work early on. Furthermore, findings from the field study contribute to the conceptualization of the largely unexplored phenomenon of shared understanding and its formation.

[1]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Engineering for Shared Understanding in Heterogeneous Work Groups - An Action Research Study at a German Automotive Company , 2013 .

[2]  Gwendolyn L. Kolfschoten,et al.  The Collaboration Engineering Approach for Designing Collaboration Processes , 2007, CRIWG.

[3]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Facilitator-in-a-Box: Process Support Applications to Help Practitioners Realize the Potential of Collaboration Technology , 2013, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Maaike Kleinsmann,et al.  Understanding the complexity of knowledge integration in collaborative new product development teams: A case study , 2010 .

[5]  M. Baker A model for negotiation in teaching-learning dialogues , 1994 .

[6]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  A conceptual foundation of the thinkLet concept for Collaboration Engineering , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries , 2001 .

[8]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  On the Measurement of Ideation Quality , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  James A. Pharmer,et al.  When Member Homogeneity is Needed in Work Teams , 2000 .

[10]  G. Bodner Constructivism: A theory of knowledge , 1986 .

[11]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  The Emergence of Mutual and Shared Understanding in the System Development Process , 2013, REFSQ.

[12]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  A Diagnostic to Identify and Resolve Different Sources of Disagreement in Collaborative Requirements Engineering , 2009 .

[13]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Collaboration Engineering: Foundations and Opportunities: Editorial to the Special Issue on the Journal of the Association of Information Systems , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Coding for Unique Ideas and Ambiguity: Measuring the Effects of a Convergence Intervention on the Artifact of an Ideation Activity , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[15]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[16]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Knowledge Convergence in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: The Role of External Representation Tools , 2005 .

[17]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Why Shared Understanding Matters -- Engineering a Collaboration Process for Shared Understanding to Improve Collaboration Effectiveness in Heterogeneous Teams , 2013, 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[18]  P. Kirschner,et al.  Team learning: building shared mental models , 2011 .

[19]  Gwendolyn L. Kolfschoten,et al.  The Joint Struggle of Complex Engineering: a Study of the Challenges of Collaborative Design , 2012, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[20]  Claudia Biermann,et al.  Group Processes In The Classroom , 2016 .

[21]  Judy McKay,et al.  The dual imperatives of action research , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.

[22]  Ruth Kanfer,et al.  Age and gender diversity as determinants of performance and health in a public organization: the role of task complexity and group size. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Defining Key Concepts for Collaboration Engineering , 2006, AMCIS.

[24]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Collaboration Engineering - IT-gestützte Zusammenarbeitsprozesse systematisch entwickeln und durchführen , 2014 .

[25]  Daniel L. Sherrell,et al.  Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 1999 .

[26]  Mien Segers,et al.  Reconsidering group cognition: From conceptual confusion to a boundary area between cognitive and socio-cultural perspectives? , 2007 .

[27]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  The Yield Shift Theory of Satisfaction and Its Application to the IS/IT Domain , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Maaike Kleinsmann,et al.  Barriers and enablers for creating shared understanding in co-design projects , 2008 .

[29]  R. G. Pascual Tools for capturing and training shared understanding in teams , 1999 .

[30]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Quality as a function of quantity in electronic brainstorming , 1997, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[32]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Bounded Ideation Theory , 2010, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Ingrid Mulder,et al.  Assessing group learning and shared understanding in technology-mediated interaction , 2002, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[34]  Gwendolyn L. Kolfschoten,et al.  A Design Approach for Collaboration Processes: A Multimethod Design Science Study in Collaboration Engineering , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Symmetry of ignorance, social creativity, and meta-design , 2000, Knowl. Based Syst..

[36]  Yvonne Hsieh,et al.  Culture and Shared Understanding in Distributed Requirements Engineering , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE'06).

[37]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[38]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  The Three Cycle View of Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[39]  B. de Vries,et al.  Building and supporting shared understanding in collaborative problem-solving , 2005, Ninth International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV'05).

[40]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Action Research , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Marina Jirotka,et al.  Shared understanding of end-users' requirements in e-Science projects , 2009, 2009 5th IEEE International Conference on E-Science Workshops.

[42]  L. Vygotsky Genesis of the higher mental functions. , 1991 .

[43]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Invoking Social Comparison to Improve Electronic Brainstorming: Beyond Anonymity , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Leveraging Crowdsourcing: Activation-Supporting Components for IT-Based Ideas Competition , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[45]  Nigel Shadbolt,et al.  Shared Understanding within Military Coalitions: A Definition and Review of Research Challenges , 2009 .

[46]  J. Piaget The Psychology Of Intelligence , 1951 .

[47]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Metaphor No More: A 15-Year Review of the Team Mental Model Construct , 2010 .

[48]  Jihong Liu,et al.  Shared design thinking process model for supporting collaborative design , 2010, The 2010 14th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design.

[49]  Monica J. Garfield,et al.  Toward an Integrated Model of Group Development: Disruption of Routines by Technology-Induced Change , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Knowledge convergence and collaborative learning , 2007 .

[51]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  On theory-driven design and deployment of collaboration systems , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[52]  Robert Owen. Briggs The focus theory of group productivity and its application to development and testing of electronic group support systems. , 1994 .

[53]  Janice Langan-Fox,et al.  Mental models, team mental models, and performance: Process, development, and future directions , 2004 .