Study of target and non-target interplay in spatial attention task

Abstract Selective visual attention is the ability to selectively pay attention to the targets while inhibiting the distractors. This paper aims to study the targets and non-targets interplay in spatial attention task while subject attends to the target object present in one visual hemifield and ignores the distractor present in another visual hemifield. This paper performs the averaged evoked response potential (ERP) analysis and time-frequency analysis. ERP analysis agrees to the left hemisphere superiority over late potentials for the targets present in right visual hemifield. Time-frequency analysis performed suggests two parameters i.e. event-related spectral perturbation (ERSP) and inter-trial coherence (ITC). These parameters show the same properties for the target present in either of the visual hemifields but show the difference while comparing the activity corresponding to the targets and non-targets. In this way, this study helps to visualise the difference between targets present in the left and right visual hemifields and, also the targets and non-targets present in the left and right visual hemifields. These results could be utilised to monitor subjects’ performance in brain–computer interface (BCI) and neurorehabilitation.

[1]  S Makeig,et al.  Functionally independent components of early event-related potentials in a visual spatial attention task. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[2]  Fabio Babiloni,et al.  Investigation of the effect of EEG-BCI on the simultaneous execution of flight simulation and attentional tasks , 2015, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[3]  J Driver,et al.  A selective review of selective attention research from the past century. , 2001, British journal of psychology.

[4]  Satoshi Shioiri,et al.  Asymmetrical brain activity induced by voluntary spatial attention depends on the visual hemifield: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study , 2011, Brain and Cognition.

[5]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Functionally Independent Components of the Late Positive Event-Related Potential during Visual Spatial Attention , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  C. Mukundan,et al.  Differential processing of visual information from right and left central hemifields during binocular viewing , 2005 .

[7]  J Townsend,et al.  Visual attention abnormalities in autism: Delayed orienting to location , 1996, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[8]  Nikolaos Engonopoulos,et al.  Linguistic Complexity and Cognitive Load in a Dual-Task Context , 2013 .

[9]  S. Makeig,et al.  Section: Behavioral/systems/cognitive Medial Prefrontal Theta Bursts Precede Rapid Motor Responses during Visual Selective Attention Introduction , 2022 .

[10]  Jens Haueisen,et al.  Dipole models for the EEG and MEG , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Rolf Verleger,et al.  Differences between visual hemifields in identifying rapidly presented target stimuli: letters and digits, faces, and shapes , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[12]  Alex Martin,et al.  Two distinct forms of functional lateralization in the human brain , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.