Gemini planet imager observational calibrations V: astrometry and distortion

We present the results of both laboratory and on sky astrometric characterization of the Gemini Planet Imager (GPI). This characterization includes measurement of the pixel scale* of the integral field spectrograph (IFS), the position of the detector with respect to north, and optical distortion. Two of these three quantities (pixel scale and distortion) were measured in the laboratory using two transparent grids of spots, one with a square pattern and the other with a random pattern. The pixel scale in the laboratory was also estimate using small movements of the artificial star unit (ASU) in the GPI adaptive optics system. On sky, the pixel scale and the north angle are determined using a number of known binary or multiple systems and Solar System objects, a subsample of which had concurrent measurements at Keck Observatory. Our current estimate of the GPI pixel scale is 14.14 ± 0.01 millarcseconds/pixel, and the north angle is -1.00 ± 0.03°. Distortion is shown to be small, with an average positional residual of 0.26 pixels over the field of view, and is corrected using a 5th order polynomial. We also present results from Monte Carlo simulations of the GPI Exoplanet Survey (GPIES) assuming GPI achieves ~1 milliarcsecond relative astrometric precision. We find that with this precision, we will be able to constrain the eccentricities of all detected planets, and possibly determine the underlying eccentricity distribution of widely separated Jovians.

[1]  Andrew W. Serio,et al.  First light of the Gemini Planet Imager , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Bruce Macintosh,et al.  Experimental Design for the Gemini Planet Imager , 2011, 1103.6085.

[3]  Jason T. Wright,et al.  THE TRENDS HIGH-CONTRAST IMAGING SURVEY. II. DIRECT DETECTION OF THE HD 8375 TERTIARY , 2012, 1210.7374.

[4]  Nuno C. Santos,et al.  Extrasolar Planets: Statistical properties of exoplanets , 2007 .

[5]  Jay Anderson,et al.  An Improved Distortion Solution for the Hubble Space Telescope’s WFPC2 , 2002 .

[6]  Russel J. White,et al.  A SURVEY OF STELLAR FAMILIES: MULTIPLICITY OF SOLAR-TYPE STARS , 2009, 1007.0414.

[7]  Markus Hartung,et al.  SUBSYSTEMS IN NEARBY SOLAR-TYPE WIDE BINARIES , 2010, 1006.1253.

[8]  Donald Gavel,et al.  Integration and test of the Gemini Planet Imager , 2011, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[9]  Lynne Hillenbrand,et al.  THE PALOMAR/KECK ADAPTIVE OPTICS SURVEY OF YOUNG SOLAR ANALOGS: EVIDENCE FOR A UNIVERSAL COMPANION MASS FUNCTION , 2008, 0808.2982.

[10]  Emiliano Diolaiti,et al.  StarFinder: an IDL GUI-based code to analyze crowded fields with isoplanatic correcting PSF fitting , 2000, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[11]  Kjetil Dohlen,et al.  SPHERE: a planet finder instrument for the VLT , 2006, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[12]  Justin R. Crepp,et al.  FORMATION, SURVIVAL, AND DETECTABILITY OF PLANETS BEYOND 100 AU , 2009, 0902.2779.

[13]  Fredrik T. Rantakyrö,et al.  Gemini planet imager observational calibrations VIII: characterization and role of satellite spots , 2014, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[14]  C. Marois,et al.  The Volume-limited A-Star (VAST) survey – I. Companions and the unexpected X-ray detection of B6–A7 stars , 2011, 1103.4363.

[15]  S. Esposito,et al.  DIFFRACTION-LIMITED VISIBLE LIGHT IMAGES OF ORION TRAPEZIUM CLUSTER WITH THE MAGELLAN ADAPTIVE SECONDARY ADAPTIVE OPTICS SYSTEM (MagAO) , 2013, 1308.4155.

[16]  Simon Thibault,et al.  Data reduction pipeline for the Gemini Planet Imager , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[17]  Marc J. Kuchner,et al.  THE GEMINI NICI PLANET-FINDING CAMPAIGN: DISCOVERY OF A CLOSE SUBSTELLAR COMPANION TO THE YOUNG DEBRIS DISK STAR PZ Tel , 2010, 1007.4808.

[18]  C. Marois,et al.  Accurate Astrometry and Photometry of Saturated and Coronagraphic Point Spread Functions , 2006, astro-ph/0604256.

[19]  Ralph Neuhäuser,et al.  New observations of the PZ Tel system, its substellar companion and debris disc⋆ , 2012 .

[20]  Mukremin Kilic,et al.  THE TRENDS HIGH-CONTRAST IMAGING SURVEY. III. A FAINT WHITE DWARF COMPANION ORBITING HD 114174 , 2013 .

[21]  Jessica R. Lu,et al.  Measuring Distance and Properties of the Milky Way’s Central Supermassive Black Hole with Stellar Orbits , 2008, 0808.2870.

[22]  C. G. Wynne Field imaging in very large telescopes , 1994 .

[23]  B. Oppenheimer,et al.  Astrometry and Photometry with Coronagraphs , 2006, astro-ph/0606136.

[24]  Malcolm Smith,et al.  The Gemini Planet Imager: integration and status , 2012, Other Conferences.

[25]  Simon Thibault,et al.  Performance of the integral field spectrograph for the Gemini Planet Imager , 2012, Other Conferences.

[26]  Brian J. Bauman,et al.  The integral field spectrograph for the Gemini planet imager , 2014, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[27]  Fredrik T. Rantakyrö,et al.  Gemini Planet Imager observational calibrations I: Overview of the GPI data reduction pipeline , 2014, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[28]  Jessica R. Lu,et al.  IMPROVING GALACTIC CENTER ASTROMETRY BY REDUCING THE EFFECTS OF GEOMETRIC DISTORTION , 2010 .