Exploring Protein-Peptide Binding Specificity through Computational Peptide Screening

The binding of short disordered peptide stretches to globular protein domains is important for a wide range of cellular processes, including signal transduction, protein transport, and immune response. The often promiscuous nature of these interactions and the conformational flexibility of the peptide chain, sometimes even when bound, make the binding specificity of this type of protein interaction a challenge to understand. Here we develop and test a Monte Carlo-based procedure for calculating protein-peptide binding thermodynamics for many sequences in a single run. The method explores both peptide sequence and conformational space simultaneously by simulating a joint probability distribution which, in particular, makes searching through peptide sequence space computationally efficient. To test our method, we apply it to 3 different peptide-binding protein domains and test its ability to capture the experimentally determined specificity profiles. Insight into the molecular underpinnings of the observed specificities is obtained by analyzing the peptide conformational ensembles of a large number of binding-competent sequences. We also explore the possibility of using our method to discover new peptide-binding pockets on protein structures.

[1]  S. Subramani.  Targeting of proteins into the peroxisomal matrix , 2004, The Journal of Membrane Biology.

[2]  R. J. Cohen,et al.  Promiscuous binding of extracellular peptides to cell surface class I MHC protein , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Sarah A. Teichmann,et al.  Principles of protein-protein interactions , 2002, ECCB.

[4]  Harel Weinstein,et al.  Thermodynamic basis for promiscuity and selectivity in protein-protein interactions: PDZ domains, a case study. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[5]  Erik Sandelin,et al.  Monte Carlo procedure for protein design , 1997, cond-mat/9711092.

[6]  Stefan Wallin,et al.  Binding of Two Intrinsically Disordered Peptides to a Multi-Specific Protein: A Combined Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics Study , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[7]  Adnan Memic,et al.  T7 phage display as a method of peptide ligand discovery for PDZ domain proteins , 2009, Biopolymers.

[8]  Stefan Wallin,et al.  All-atom Monte Carlo approach to protein-peptide binding. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1978, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[10]  P. Tompa,et al.  Intrinsic disorder in cell signaling and gene transcription , 2012, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[11]  A Irbäck,et al.  Design of sequences with good folding properties in coarse-grained protein models. , 1999, Structure.

[12]  Philip Bradley,et al.  Structure‐based prediction of protein–peptide specificity in rosetta , 2010, Proteins.

[13]  H. Chan,et al.  Polyelectrostatic interactions of disordered ligands suggest a physical basis for ultrasensitivity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  K. Dill,et al.  Binding of small-molecule ligands to proteins: "what you see" is not always "what you get". , 2009, Structure.

[15]  Seong-Hwan Rho,et al.  Crystal Structure of GRIP1 PDZ6-Peptide Complex Reveals the Structural Basis for Class II PDZ Target Recognition and PDZ Domain-mediated Multimerization* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  Robert B. Russell,et al.  DILIMOT: discovery of linear motifs in proteins , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[17]  Peter James,et al.  Epitope‐specificity of recombinant antibodies reveals promiscuous peptide‐binding properties , 2012, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[18]  Michele Vendruscolo,et al.  Mapping of two networks of residues that exhibit structural and dynamical changes upon binding in a PDZ domain protein. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[19]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Optimization of specificity in a cellular protein interaction network by negative selection , 2003, Nature.

[20]  Jan C. Semenza,et al.  ERD2, a yeast gene required for the receptor-mediated retrieval of luminal ER proteins from the secretory pathway , 1990, Cell.

[21]  Richard J. Edwards,et al.  ELM—the database of eukaryotic linear motifs , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[22]  Mikael Bodén,et al.  MEME Suite: tools for motif discovery and searching , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  Nir London,et al.  Sub‐angstrom modeling of complexes between flexible peptides and globular proteins , 2010, Proteins.

[24]  Dong Xu,et al.  Correlation Between Posttranslational Modification and Intrinsic Disorder in Protein , 2011, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[25]  S. Li.  Specificity and versatility of SH3 and other proline-recognition domains: structural basis and implications for cellular signal transduction. , 2005, The Biochemical journal.

[26]  L. Iakoucheva,et al.  The importance of intrinsic disorder for protein phosphorylation. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[27]  John H. Lewis,et al.  Crystal Structures of a Complexed and Peptide-Free Membrane Protein–Binding Domain: Molecular Basis of Peptide Recognition by PDZ , 1996, Cell.

[28]  Aris Floratos,et al.  Combinatorial pattern discovery in biological sequences: The TEIRESIAS algorithm [published erratum appears in Bioinformatics 1998;14(2): 229] , 1998, Bioinform..

[29]  Harel Weinstein,et al.  A flexible docking procedure for the exploration of peptide binding selectivity to known structures and homology models of PDZ domains. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[30]  T. Gibson,et al.  Systematic Discovery of New Recognition Peptides Mediating Protein Interaction Networks , 2005, PLoS biology.

[31]  Shoba Ranganathan,et al.  Modeling the structure of bound peptide ligands to major histocompatibility complex , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[32]  Seth G. N. Grant,et al.  PDZ Domain Proteins: Plug and Play! , 2003, Science's STKE.

[33]  Jiunn R Chen,et al.  PDZ Domain Binding Selectivity Is Optimized Across the Mouse Proteome , 2007, Science.

[34]  Nicole Caspers,et al.  A thermodynamic ligand binding study of the third PDZ domain (PDZ3) from the mammalian neuronal protein PSD-95. , 2007, Biochemistry.

[35]  M. Zacharias,et al.  Conformational flexibility of the MHC class I alpha1-alpha2 domain in peptide bound and free states: a molecular dynamics simulation study. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[36]  H. Dyson,et al.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[37]  Mazen Ahmad,et al.  Mechanism of fast peptide recognition by SH3 domains. , 2008, Angewandte Chemie.

[38]  L. Cantley,et al.  Recognition of Unique Carboxyl-Terminal Motifs by Distinct PDZ Domains , 1997, Science.

[39]  Stefan Wallin,et al.  Binding Free Energy Landscape of Domain-Peptide Interactions , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[40]  Q. Deveraux,et al.  Characterization of Two Polyubiquitin Binding Sites in the 26 S Protease Subunit 5a* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[41]  D. Doyle,et al.  Structure of PICK1 and other PDZ domains obtained with the help of self‐binding C‐terminal extensions , 2007, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[42]  Jianhan Chen,et al.  Potential conformational heterogeneity of p53 bound to S100B(ββ). , 2013, Journal of molecular biology.

[43]  I Lasters,et al.  Computation of the binding of fully flexible peptides to proteins with flexible side chains , 1997, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[44]  H. Weinstein,et al.  Molecular Determinants for the Complex Binding Specificity of the PDZ Domain in PICK1* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[45]  Eugene I Shakhnovich,et al.  Structural mining: self-consistent design on flexible protein-peptide docking and transferable binding affinity potential. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[46]  D. Doyle,et al.  Unusual binding interactions in PDZ domain crystal structures help explain binding mechanisms , 2010, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[47]  Jun Xia,et al.  Clustering and synaptic targeting of PICK1 requires direct interaction between the PDZ domain and lipid membranes , 2007, The EMBO journal.

[48]  Richard J. Edwards,et al.  SLiMFinder: a web server to find novel, significantly over-represented, short protein motifs , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[49]  P. Tompa,et al.  Fuzzy complexes: polymorphism and structural disorder in protein-protein interactions. , 2008, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[50]  O. Keskin,et al.  The binding affinities of proteins interacting with the PDZ domain of PICK1 , 2012, Proteins.

[51]  G. Crooks,et al.  WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. , 2004, Genome research.

[52]  Kevin M. D'Auria,et al.  Structural and dynamic determinants of protein-peptide recognition. , 2011, Structure.

[53]  Martin Zacharias,et al.  Conformational flexibility of the MHC class I alpha1-alpha2 domain in peptide bound and free states: a molecular dynamics simulation study. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[54]  Eduardo Garcia Urdiales,et al.  Accurate Prediction of Peptide Binding Sites on Protein Surfaces , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..