Teleworkability, Preferences for Telework, and Well-Being: A Systematic Review

Telework has grown exponentially due to COVID-19, and has revealed itself as a useful work condition with a largely positive impact on employees’ well-being. Since many variables are involved in determining the relationships between telework and well-being, this paper clarifies the role of teleworkability, employees’ preference for telework, and telework intensity; specifically, how the first two variables impact on well-being through telework intensity. A systematic review was carried out between 2012 and 2022 to analyze how these variables relate. Scarce literature connecting these subjects showed that teleworkability and the preference for telework influence the amount of time employees wish to telework. Teleworkability and preference for telework need to be studied from a multilevel perspective since country-, company-, and individual-level characteristics impact on them. The results also confirmed that telework intensity establishes direct relationships with well-being, and it is essential to predict it. Hybrid work emerged as a new concept which captures the best combination between on-site work and telework. Based on their employees’ preferences, companies can introduce “hybrid-work flexible programs” to maximize its positive effects on well-being as well as being able to re-design their jobs to better fit their employees’ levels of telework expectations.

[1]  Jodi Oakman,et al.  Mental and physical health and well-being of canadian employees who were working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2022, BMC Public Health.

[2]  M. Biron,et al.  Integrating push–pull dynamics for understanding the association between boundary control and work outcomes in the context of mandatory work from home , 2022, International Journal of Manpower.

[3]  Tuija Muhonen,et al.  Job Demands, Resources, and Future Considerations: Academics' Experiences of Working From Home During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic , 2022, Frontiers in Psychology.

[4]  B. M. Tabak,et al.  The role of non-critical business and telework propensity in international stock markets during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2022, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money.

[5]  Begoña Urien,et al.  Telework in Baltic Countries during the Pandemic: Effects on Wellbeing, Job Satisfaction, and Work-Life Balance , 2022, Sustainability.

[6]  Nicolas Michinov,et al.  Work-From-Home During COVID-19 Lockdown: When Employees’ Well-Being and Creativity Depend on Their Psychological Profiles , 2022, Frontiers in Psychology.

[7]  T. Nagata,et al.  Association of Preference and Frequency of Teleworking with Work Functioning Impairment , 2022, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[8]  M. Chambel,et al.  Teleworking in times of COVID-19: the role of Family-Supportive supervisor behaviors in workers’ work-family management, exhaustion, and work engagement , 2022, The International Journal of Human Resource Management.

[9]  S. Hauff,et al.  The joint role of HRM and leadership for teleworker well-being: An analysis during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2022, German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung.

[10]  Paula Rodríguez-Modroño,et al.  Assessing gender inequality in digital labour platforms in Europe , 2022, Internet Policy Rev..

[11]  Antonio Caparrós Ruiz.  Factors determining teleworking before and during COVID-19: some evidence from Spain and Andalusia , 2022, Applied Economic Analysis.

[12]  Mladen Adamovic.  How does employee cultural background influence the effects of telework on job stress? The roles of power distance, individualism, and beliefs about telework , 2022, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[13]  Liuba Y. Belkin,et al.  Surviving remotely: How job control and loneliness during a forced shift to remote work impacted employee work behaviors and well‐being , 2022, Human Resource Management.

[14]  J. Bartels,et al.  Is Anyone Else Feeling Completely Nonessential? Meaningful Work, Identification, Job Insecurity, and Online Organizational Behavior during a Lockdown in The Netherlands , 2022, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[15]  Kerri M. Camp,et al.  A millennial manager skills model for the new remote work environment , 2022, Management Research Review.

[16]  Maral Babapour Chafi,et al.  Post-Pandemic Office Work: Perceived Challenges and Opportunities for a Sustainable Work Environment , 2021, Sustainability.

[17]  A. Preda,et al.  Using Neural Networks in Order to Analyze Telework Adaptability across the European Union Countries: A Case Study of the Most Relevant Scenarios to Occur in Romania , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[18]  K. Plant,et al.  Audit practice: A straightforward trade or a complex system? , 2021, International Journal of Auditing.

[19]  C. Tramontano,et al.  “It needs to be the right blend”: a qualitative exploration of remote e-workers’ experience and well-being at work , 2021, Employee Relations: The International Journal.

[20]  M. Nagata,et al.  A Cross-Sectional Study of the Mismatch Between Telecommuting Preference and Frequency Associated With Psychological Distress Among Japanese Workers in the COVID-19 Pandemic. , 2021, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[21]  V. De Stefano,et al.  Essential jobs, remote work and digital surveillance: Addressing the COVID‐19 pandemic panopticon , 2021, International labour review.

[22]  Johannes Breuer,et al.  From cognitive overload to digital detox: Psychological implications of telework during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2021, Computers in Human Behavior.

[23]  Pierre Bérastégui.  Teleworking in the Aftermath of the Covid-19 Pandemic: Enabling Conditions for a Successful Transition , 2021 .

[24]  Taewon Yoon,et al.  Supervision of Telework: A Key to Organizational Performance , 2021 .

[25]  T. Nagata,et al.  Intensity of Home-Based Telework and Work Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic , 2021, medRxiv.

[26]  E. Mayo-Wilson,et al.  The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews , 2021, BMJ.

[27]  J. Armoogum,et al.  Perception and Preference for Home-Based Telework in the COVID-19 Era: A Gender-Based Analysis in Hanoi, Vietnam , 2021, Sustainability.

[28]  Emilie Vayre.  Challenges in Deploying Telework: Benefits and Risks for Employees , 2021 .

[29]  A. Gragnano,et al.  Not All Telework is Valuable , 2021 .

[30]  I. Saleem,et al.  Work during COVID-19: assessing the influence of job demands and resources on practical and psychological outcomes for employees , 2021 .

[31]  S. Ricci,et al.  Health and Telework: New Challenges after COVID-19 Pandemic , 2021, European Journal of Environment and Public Health.

[32]  Ma. Theresa Alfanza.  Telecommuting Intensity in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic: Job Performance and Work-Life Balance , 2021 .

[33]  Ghulam Abid,et al.  E-Leadership and Teleworking in Times of COVID-19 and Beyond: What We Know and Where Do We Go , 2020, Frontiers in Psychology.

[34]  M. Arntz,et al.  Working from Home and COVID-19: The Chances and Risks for Gender Gaps , 2020, Intereconomics.

[35]  B. Aczel,et al.  Researchers working from home: Benefits and challenges , 2020, PloS one.

[36]  Marco Antonio Leandro Cabral,et al.  Ergonomics and telework: A systematic review. , 2020, Work.

[37]  Marina Heiden,et al.  Telework in academia: associations with health and well-being among staff , 2020, Higher Education.

[38]  Era Dabla-Norris,et al.  Who Bears the Brunt of Lockdown Policies? Evidence from Tele-workability Measures Across Countries , 2020, IMF Economic Review.

[39]  S. Sorrell,et al.  The limits of energy sufficiency: A review of the evidence for rebound effects and negative spillovers from behavioural change , 2020 .

[40]  Amaya Erro-Garcés,et al.  Teleworking in the Context of the Covid-19 Crisis , 2020 .

[41]  Jonathan I. Dingel,et al.  How many jobs can be done at home?☆ , 2020, Journal of Public Economics.

[42]  Sachiko Kazekami,et al.  Mechanisms to improve labor productivity by performing telework , 2020, Telecommunications Policy.

[43]  Jia Gao,et al.  Does Telework Stress Employees Out? A Study on Working at Home and Subjective Well-Being for Wage/Salary Workers , 2019, Journal of Happiness Studies.

[44]  J. Giménez-Nadal,et al.  Work time and well-being for workers at home: evidence from the American Time Use Survey , 2019, International Journal of Manpower.

[45]  Aida Isabel Tavares,et al.  Telework and health effects review , 2017 .

[46]  Sadiq Naveed,et al.  How to Conduct a Systematic Review: A Narrative Literature Review , 2016, Cureus.

[47]  Jean Adams,et al.  Searching and synthesising ‘grey literature’ and ‘grey information’ in public health: critical reflections on three case studies , 2016, Systematic Reviews.

[48]  R. Henke,et al.  The Effects of Telecommuting Intensity on Employee Health , 2016, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[49]  Ronald Batenburg,et al.  Telework adoption and formalisation in organisations from a knowlegde transfer perspective , 2016 .

[50]  Seth A. Kaplan,et al.  The impact of telework on emotional experience: When, and for whom, does telework improve daily affective well-being? , 2015 .

[51]  Tammy D Allen,et al.  How Effective Is Telecommuting? Assessing the Status of Our Scientific Findings , 2015, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[52]  Hanne Vesala,et al.  Slowing work down by teleworking periodically in rural settings , 2015 .

[53]  Hamidreza Asgari,et al.  Toward a Comprehensive Telecommuting Analysis Framework , 2015 .

[54]  Christine Grant,et al.  An exploration of the psychological factors affecting remote e‐worker's job effectiveness, well‐being and work‐life balance , 2013 .

[55]  Nicholas Bloom,et al.  Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment , 2013 .

[56]  B. Martin,et al.  Is telework effective for organizations , 2012 .

[57]  S. Armeli,et al.  Personality Moderates the Interaction between Positive and Negative Daily Events Predicting Negative Affect and Stress. , 2009, Journal of research in personality.

[58]  Marlys K. Christianson,et al.  Happiness, Health, or Relationships? Managerial Practices and Employee Well-Being Tradeoffs , 2007 .

[59]  Kea G. Tijdens,et al.  Employees' opportunities, preferences, and practices in telecommuting adoption , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[60]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Quality of management by objectives, task-related stressors, and non-task-related stressors as predictors of stress and job satisfaction among teleworkers , 2003 .

[61]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[62]  G. Graen,et al.  Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective , 1995 .

[63]  Christopher L. Erickson,et al.  The Role of Institutions in Job Teleworkability Before and After the Covid-19 Pandemic , 2023, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[64]  Marco Bertoni,et al.  Remote Working and Mental Health During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic , 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[65]  Nicolas Gavoille,et al.  Personality Traits, Remote Work and Productivity , 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[66]  Jiayin Hu,et al.  Is Working from Home Here to Stay? Evidence from Job Posting Data after the COVID-19 Shock , 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[67]  M. Gloet,et al.  The role of organisational support in teleworker wellbeing: a socio-technical systems approach. , 2016, Applied ergonomics.

[68]  D. Harrison,et al.  The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.