Cost analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery procedures

AbstractBackground Robotic surgical systems have been used at a rapidly increasing rate in general surgery. Many of these procedures have been performed laparoscopically for years. In a surgical encounter, a significant portion of the total costs is associated with consumable supplies. Our hospital system has invested in a software program that can track the costs of consumable surgical supplies. We sought to determine the differences in cost of consumables with elective laparoscopic and robotic procedures for our health care organization.Methods De-identified procedural cost and equipment utilization data were collected from the Surgical Profitability Compass Procedure Cost Manager System (The Advisory Board Company, Washington, DC) for our health care system for laparoscopic and robotic cholecystectomy, fundoplication, and inguinal hernia between the years 2013 and 2015. Outcomes were length of stay, case duration, and supply cost. Statistical analysis was performed using a t-test for continuous variables, and statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.ResultsThe total cost of consumable surgical supplies was significantly greater for all robotic procedures. Length of stay did not differ for fundoplication or cholecystectomy. Length of stay was greater for robotic inguinal hernia repair. Case duration was similar for cholecystectomy (84.3 robotic and 75.5 min laparoscopic, p = 0.08), but significantly longer for robotic fundoplication (197.2 robotic and 162.1 min laparoscopic, p = 0.01) and inguinal hernia repair (124.0 robotic and 84.4 min laparoscopic, p = ≪0.01).ConclusionsWe found a significantly increased cost of general surgery procedures for our health care system when cases commonly performed laparoscopically are instead performed robotically. Our analysis is limited by the fact that we only included costs associated with consumable surgical supplies. The initial acquisition cost (over $1 million for robotic surgical system), depreciation, and service contract for the robotic and laparoscopic systems were not included in this analysis.

[1]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  G. Currò,et al.  Three-Dimensional Versus Two-Dimensional Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy. , 2016, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[4]  Shawn Tsuda,et al.  SAGES TAVAC safety and effectiveness analysis: da Vinci® Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) , 2015, Surgical Endoscopy.

[5]  G. Barbash,et al.  New technology and health care costs--the case of robot-assisted surgery. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  M. Kroh,et al.  Minilaparoscopy with Interchangeable, Full 5-mm End Effectors: First Human Use of a New Minimally Invasive Operating Platform. , 2016, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[7]  Benjamin R. Lee,et al.  Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve? , 2002, Urology.

[8]  J Kellogg Parsons,et al.  The first national examination of outcomes and trends in robotic surgery in the United States. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[9]  Elspeth M. McDougall,et al.  Evaluation of the impact of three-dimensional vision on laparoscopic performance. , 2014, Journal of endourology.

[10]  Martin Lacher,et al.  3-Dimensional (3D) laparoscopy improves operating time in small spaces without impact on hemodynamics and psychomental stress parameters of the surgeon , 2015, Surgical Endoscopy.

[11]  G. Currò,et al.  Three-Dimensional (3D) Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study , 2015, Obesity Surgery.

[12]  M. Talamini,et al.  Robotic abdominal surgery. , 2004, American journal of surgery.

[13]  K. Peeters,et al.  Nationwide outcome registrations to improve quality of care in rectal surgery. An initiative of the European society of surgical oncology , 2009, Journal of surgical oncology.

[14]  G. Goldberg,et al.  Concurrent robotic trans‐abdominal pre‐peritoneal (TAP) herniorrhaphy during robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy , 2010, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[15]  E. Barrera,et al.  Patient-centered outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 2013, Surgical Endoscopy.

[16]  Georg Werkgartner,et al.  Prospective study comparing standard and robotically assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 2006, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.

[17]  Mark R. Wilson,et al.  Robotic technology results in faster and more robust surgical skill acquisition than traditional laparoscopy , 2015, Journal of Robotic Surgery.

[18]  Phillip Mucksavage,et al.  The da Vinci(®) Surgical System overcomes innate hand dominance. , 2011, Journal of endourology.

[19]  C. N. Gutt,et al.  Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic fundoplication: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized controlled trial , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[20]  Dimitrios Stefanidis,et al.  The first nationwide evaluation of robotic general surgery: a regionalized, small but safe start , 2014, Surgical Endoscopy.

[21]  D. Nio,et al.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[22]  S. Brancato,et al.  Comparison of postural ergonomics between laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy: a pilot study. , 2015, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[23]  T. Ahlering,et al.  Transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and inguinal herniorrhaphy , 2008, Journal of robotic surgery.

[24]  C. Tsui,et al.  Minimally invasive surgery: national trends in adoption and future directions for hospital strategy , 2013, Surgical Endoscopy.

[25]  J. Gould,et al.  Transabdominal preperitoneal robotic inguinal hernia repair. , 2008, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[26]  T. Ahlering,et al.  Combined inguinal hernia repair with prosthetic mesh during transperitoneal robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a 4-year experience. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[27]  M. Puhan,et al.  Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Outcome and Cost Analyses of a Case-matched Control Study , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[28]  R. L. Berger,et al.  Laparoscopic repair reduces incidence of surgical site infections for all ventral hernias , 2015, Surgical Endoscopy.

[29]  B. Thompson,et al.  Reducing costs while maintaining quality in endovascular neurosurgical procedures. , 2014, Journal of neurosurgery.

[30]  Mohamed R Ali,et al.  Robotic cholecystectomy: learning curve, advantages, and limitations. , 2006, The Journal of surgical research.

[31]  Martin Lacher,et al.  Erratum to: 3-Dimensional (3D) laparoscopy improves operating time in small spaces without impact on hemodynamics and psychomental stress parameters of the surgeon , 2015, Surgical Endoscopy.

[32]  J. Byrne,et al.  Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: a comparison of outcomes , 2015, Surgical Endoscopy.

[33]  A. Gonzalez,et al.  Feasibility of robotic inguinal hernia repair, a single-institution experience , 2016, Surgical Endoscopy.

[34]  Thomas Langø,et al.  European association of endoscopic surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery , 2015, Surgical Endoscopy.

[35]  A. V. van Bommel,et al.  Reducing Healthcare Costs Facilitated by Surgical Auditing: A Systematic Review , 2015, World Journal of Surgery.

[36]  D. Oleynikov,et al.  How does robotic anti-reflux surgery compare with traditional open and laparoscopic techniques: a cost and outcomes analysis , 2014, Surgical Endoscopy.

[37]  J. Lee,et al.  Baseline Laparoscopic Skill May Predict Baseline Robotic Skill and Early Robotic Surgery Learning Curve. , 2016, Journal of endourology.