Study of the advancing and receding contact angles: liquid sorption as a cause of contact angle hysteresis.

Two types of experiments were used to study the behavior of both advancing and receding contact angles, namely the dynamic one-cycle contact angle (DOCA) and the dynamic cycling contact angle (DCCA) experiments. For the preliminary study, DOCA measurements of different liquids on different solids were performed using an automated axisymmetric drop shape analysis-profile (ADSA-P). From these experimental results, four patterns of receding contact angle were observed: (1) time-dependent receding contact angle; (2) constant receding contact angle; (3) 'stick/slip'; (4) no receding contact angle. For the purpose of illustration, results from four different solid surfaces are shown. These solids are: FC-732-coated surface; poly(methyl methacrylate/n-butyl methacrylate) [P(MMA/nBMA)]; poly(lactic acid) (DL-PLA); and poly(lactic/glycolic acid) 50/50 (DL-PLGA 50/50). Since most of the surfaces in our studies exhibit time dependence in the receding contact angle, a more extended study was conducted using only FC-732-coated surfaces to better understand the possible causes of decreasing receding contact angle and contact angle hysteresis. Contact angle measurements of 21 liquids from two homologous series (i.e. n-alkanes and 1-alcohols) and octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (OCMTS) on FC-732-coated surfaces were performed. It is apparent that the contact angle hysteresis decreases with the chain length of the liquid. It was found that the receding contact angle equals the advancing angle when the alkane molecules are infinitely large. These results strongly suggest that the chain length and size of the liquid molecule could contribute to contact angle hysteresis phenomena. Furthermore, DCCA measurements of six liquids from the two homologous series on FC-732-coated surfaces were performed. With these experimental results, one can construe that the time dependence of contact angle hysteresis on relatively smooth and homogeneous surfaces is mainly caused by liquid retention/sorption. The results also suggested that the contact angle hysteresis will eventually approach a steady state, where the rate of liquid retention-evaporation or sorption process would balance out each other. If the existence of contact angle hysteresis can be attributed to liquid sorption/retention, one should only use the advancing contact angles (measured on a dry surface) in conjunction with Young's equation for surface energetic calculations.

[1]  R. H. Dettre,et al.  Contact Angle Hysteresis. IV. Contact Angle Measurements on Heterogeneous Surfaces1 , 1965 .

[2]  Thomas Young,et al.  An Essay on the Cohesion of Fluids , 1800 .

[3]  A. Fadeev,et al.  Trialkylsilane Monolayers Covalently Attached to Silicon Surfaces: Wettability Studies Indicating that Molecular Topography Contributes to Contact Angle Hysteresis , 1999 .

[4]  Abraham Marmur,et al.  CONTACT ANGLE HYSTERESIS ON HETEROGENEOUS SMOOTH SURFACES , 1994 .

[5]  A. Neumann,et al.  Thermodynamics of contact angles. II. Rough solid surfaces , 1975 .

[6]  R. H. Dettre,et al.  Contact Angle Hysteresis. III. Study of an Idealized Heterogeneous Surface , 1964 .

[7]  Daniel Y. Kwok,et al.  The effect of liquid properties to contact angle hysteresis , 2001 .

[8]  S. G. Mason,et al.  Liquid spreading on rough metal surfaces , 1980 .

[9]  J. Youngblood,et al.  Ultrahydrophobic polymer surfaces prepared by simultaneous ablation of polypropylene and sputtering of poly(tetrafluoroethylene) using radio frequency plasma , 1999 .

[10]  J. Israelachvili,et al.  Direct measurement of structural forces between two surfaces in a nonpolar liquid , 1981 .

[11]  A. Amirfazli,et al.  Measurements of Line Tension for Solid−Liquid−Vapor Systems Using Drop Size Dependence of Contact Angles and Its Correlation with Solid−Liquid Interfacial Tension , 2000 .

[12]  Wei Chen,et al.  Layer-by-layer deposition : A tool for polymer surface modification , 1997 .

[13]  Daniel Y. Kwok,et al.  Contact angle measurement and contact angle interpretation , 1999 .

[14]  Brandon,et al.  Simulation of Contact Angle Hysteresis on Chemically Heterogeneous Surfaces , 1996, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[15]  Dongqing Li,et al.  EQUATION OF STATE FOR INTERFACIAL TENSIONS OF SOLID-LIQUID SYSTEMS , 1992 .

[16]  D. Kwok,et al.  Contact angle measurements by axisymmetric drop shape analysis and an automated polynomial fit program , 1998 .

[17]  J. K. Spelt,et al.  THE EQUATION OF STATE APPROACH TO INTERFACIAL TENSIONS , 1992 .

[18]  F. E. Bartell,et al.  The Effect of Surface Roughness on Apparent Contact Angles and on Contact Angle Hysteresis. I. The system Paraffin–Water–Air , 1953 .

[19]  Dongqing Li,et al.  Contact angles on hydrophobic solid surfaces and their interpretation , 1992 .

[20]  W. Zisman,et al.  Contact angle, wettability, and adhesion , 1964 .

[21]  Rossen Sedev,et al.  Dynamic contact angles at low velocities , 1993 .

[22]  S. Garoff,et al.  Contact Line Structure and Dynamics on Surfaces with Contact Angle Hysteresis , 1997 .

[23]  D. Kwok,et al.  Measuring and interpreting contact angles: a complex issue , 1998 .

[24]  Dongqing Li,et al.  Dynamic Cycling Contact Angle Measurements: Study of Advancing and Receding Contact Angles , 2001 .

[25]  M. Chaudhury,et al.  Interfacial Lifshitz-van der Waals and polar interactions in macroscopic systems , 1988 .

[26]  R. Good,et al.  A Thermodynamic Derivation of Wenzel's Modification of Young's Equation for Contact Angles; Together with a Theory of Hysteresis1 , 1952 .

[27]  W. Zisman,et al.  The effect of liquid structure on contact angle hysteresis , 1966 .

[28]  Egon Matijević,et al.  Surface and Colloid Science , 1971 .

[29]  H. Jacobasch,et al.  Contact angle measurements and contact angle interpretation : 1. Contact angle measurements by axisymmetric drop shape analysis and a goniometer sessile drop technique , 1997 .

[30]  R. Sedev,et al.  Effect of Swelling of a Polymer Surface on Advancing and Receding Contact Angles , 1996 .

[31]  K. Birdi,et al.  Wettability and Contact Angles , 1984 .

[32]  D. Kwok,et al.  Low-rate Dynamic Contact Angles on Poly(methyl methacrylate/n-butyl methacrylate) and the Determination of Solid Surface Tensions , 1998 .

[33]  A. Neumann,et al.  An equation-of-state approach to determine surface tensions of low-energy solids from contact angles , 1974 .

[34]  Dongqing Li,et al.  Automation of axisymmetric drop shape analysis for measurements of interfacial tensions and contact angles , 1990 .

[35]  A. Neumann,et al.  Correlation of Line Tension and Solid-Liquid Interfacial Tension from the Measurement of Drop Size Dependence of Contact Angles , 1995 .

[36]  Alexander Y. Fadeev,et al.  Binary Monolayer Mixtures: Modification of Nanopores in Silicon-Supported Tris(trimethylsiloxy)silyl Monolayers , 1999 .

[37]  S. Garoff,et al.  Using Vibrational Noise To Probe Energy Barriers Producing Contact Angle Hysteresis , 1996 .

[38]  R. Good,et al.  Thermodynamics of contact angles. I. Heterogeneous solid surfaces , 1972 .