Propensity score matching in SPSS

Propensity score matching is a tool for causal inference in non-randomized studies that allows for conditioning on large sets of covariates. The use of propensity scores in the social sciences is currently experiencing a tremendous increase; however it is far from a commonly used tool. One impediment towards a more wide-spread use of propensity score methods is the reliance on specialized software, because many social scientists still use SPSS as their main analysis tool. The current paper presents an implementation of various propensity score matching methods in SPSS. Specifically the presented SPSS custom dialog allows researchers to specify propensity score methods using the familiar point-and-click interface. The software allows estimation of the propensity score using logistic regression and specifying nearest-neighbor matching with many options, e.g., calipers, region of common support, matching with and without replacement, and matching one to many units. Detailed balance statistics and graphs are produced by the program.

[1]  Jens Hainmueller,et al.  Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies , 2012, Political Analysis.

[2]  Gary King,et al.  Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference , 2007, Political Analysis.

[3]  Jake Bowers,et al.  Covariate balance in simple stratified and clustered comparative studies , 2008, 0808.3857.

[4]  Jasjeet S. Sekhon,et al.  Multivariate and Propensity Score Matching Software with Automated Balance Optimization: The Matching Package for R , 2008 .

[5]  Donald Rubin,et al.  Estimating Causal Effects from Large Data Sets Using Propensity Scores , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[6]  P. Rosenbaum,et al.  Substantial Gains in Bias Reduction from Matching with a Variable Number of Controls , 2000, Biometrics.

[7]  P. Rosenbaum.  A Characterization of Optimal Designs for Observational Studies , 1991 .

[8]  P. Austin.  Comparing paired vs non-paired statistical methods of analyses when making inferences about absolute risk reductions in propensity-score matched samples , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[10]  Stephen W. Raudenbush,et al.  Effects of Kindergarten Retention Policy on Children’s Cognitive Growth in Reading and Mathematics , 2005 .

[11]  Peter M. Steiner,et al.  Can Nonrandomized Experiments Yield Accurate Answers? A Randomized Experiment Comparing Random and Nonrandom Assignments , 2008 .

[12]  D. McCaffrey,et al.  Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies. , 2004, Psychological methods.

[13]  Stefano M. Iacus,et al.  CEM: Coarsened Exact Matching Software , 2009 .

[14]  Elizabeth A Stuart,et al.  Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. , 2010, Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics.

[15]  F. Thoemmes,et al.  A Systematic Review of Propensity Score Methods in the Social Sciences , 2011, Multivariate behavioral research.

[16]  G. King,et al.  Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching , 2012, Political Analysis.

[17]  J. Pearl.  Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .