When Ignorance Can Be Bliss: Organizational Structure and Coordination in Electronic Retailing

This study examines coordination issues that occur between the marketing department and the information technology IT department in electronic retail settings. We consider a marketing department that is responsible for choosing the level of advertising to generate traffic to the firm's website and an IT department that is responsible for choosing IT capacity to provide web visitors a satisfactory experience. The focus here is to examine how duopolistic advertising competition among firms can affect the organizational structure centralized or decentralized within each firm. In essence, our interest lies in the question: How does the presence of interfirm competition affect intra-firm coordination i.e., organizational structure? As a benchmark, we develop and solve a centralized decision model wherein the levels of advertising and IT capacity are jointly chosen in each firm to maximize profit. This is compared with a decentralized decision model in which the marketing department could potentially advertise suboptimally because its assessment of IT factors the served traffic rate is inaccurate. We find that competition can lead to a decentralized equilibrium in which both firms choose not to coordinate among their internal departments. More importantly, we find that when marketing moderately underestimates IT service quality, coordination results in a prisoners' dilemma PD equilibrium for each firm whereas decentralization is socially optimal but with an off-equilibrium outcome resulting in higher profits for each firm. That is, the conventional wisdom that "more coordination is good" could push firms toward a PD equilibrium when they can both be better off by not coordinating internally in the face of competition. This result also implies that if marketing tends to underestimate the capabilities of the IT department, it may be better to encourage such firms to coordinate less rather than encouraging them to coordinate more. The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0725 .

[1]  Gerald G. Grant,et al.  Framing the Frameworks: A Review of IT Governance Research , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Haim Mendelson,et al.  Pricing computer services: queueing effects , 1985, CACM.

[3]  G. Erickson A Model of Advertising Competition , 1985 .

[4]  Harvey M. Deitel,et al.  An introduction to operating systems , 1984 .

[5]  Gert-Jan de Vreede,et al.  Modeling and Simulating Organizational Coordination , 1998 .

[6]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Research Commentary: The Organizing Logic for an Enterprise's IT Activities in the Digital Era - A Prognosis of Practice and a Call for Research , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Roy Lubit Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Management: The Keys to Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 2001 .

[8]  Hamid Tavakolian,et al.  Linking the Information Technology Structure with Organizational Competitive Strategy: A Survey , 1989, MIS Q..

[9]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Enabling information sharing within organizations , 2007, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[10]  Zhang Wu,et al.  A duopolistic model of dynamic competitive advertising , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Kenneth R. Deal Optimizing Advertising Expenditures in a Dynamic Duopoly , 1979, Oper. Res..

[12]  S. Sethi,et al.  Competitive Advertising Under Uncertainty: A Stochastic Differential Game Approach , 2004 .

[13]  Roy Lubit The keys to sustainable competitive advantage: Tacit knowledge and knowledge management: , 2001 .

[14]  Suresh P. Sethi,et al.  Building Brand Awareness in Dynamic Oligopoly Markets , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Gary M. Erickson,et al.  Advertising Competition in a Dynamic Oligopoly with Multiple Brands , 2009, Oper. Res..

[16]  Hengdong Yang,et al.  Knowledge sharing in an organization , 2008 .

[17]  Edward W. Cundiff,et al.  Patterns of Communication in Marketing Organizations , 1965 .

[18]  Peter Weill,et al.  Don't Just Lead, Govern: How Top-Performing Firms Govern IT , 2004, MIS Q. Executive.

[19]  T. Malone,et al.  Toward an interdisciplinary theory of coordination , 2003 .

[20]  S. Kalish,et al.  Closed-Loop Advertising Strategies in a Duopoly , 1997 .

[21]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Effective intra-organizational information exchange , 1997, J. Inf. Sci..

[22]  Gila E. Fruchter,et al.  The Many-Player Advertising Game , 1999 .

[23]  Senthil K. Veeraraghavan,et al.  Quality-Speed Conundrum: Trade-offs in Customer-Intensive Services , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[24]  Hani I. Mesak,et al.  A pulsing model of advertising competition: A game theoretic approach, part A -- Theoretical foundation , 1995 .

[25]  Liang-Chu Chen,et al.  Can organizational knowledge capabilities affect knowledge sharing behavior? , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..

[26]  John Leslie King,et al.  Centralized versus decentralized computing: organizational considerations and management options , 1983, CSUR.

[27]  Gerhard Sorger,et al.  Competitive dynamic advertising: A modification of the Case game , 1989 .

[28]  Grover S. Kearns,et al.  A Resource-Based View of Strategic IT Alignment: How Knowledge Sharing Creates Competitive Advantage , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[29]  Cecilia Ruth D'Oliveira An Analysis of Computer Decentralization , 1977 .

[30]  Suresh Sethi,et al.  Generic and Brand Advertising Strategies in a Dynamic Duopoly , 2005 .

[31]  F. W. Lanchester,et al.  Aircraft in Warfare: The Dawn of the Fourth Arm , 1995 .

[32]  Yong Tan,et al.  Allocating Spending Between Advertising and Information Technology in Electronic Retailing , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[33]  G. Erickson,et al.  Advertising Strategies in a Dynamic Oligopoly , 1995 .

[34]  S. Zahra,et al.  Integrating the Content and Process of Strategic MIS Planning with Competitive Strategy , 1991 .