Therapeutic Vulnerability to ATR Inhibition in Concurrent NF1 and ATRX-Deficient/ALT-Positive High-Grade Solid Tumors

Simple Summary Tumors of the brain and nerves develop frequently in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. Many are benign growths, such as pilocytic astrocytomas in the brain and neurofibromas in the nerves. However, in some patients, the tumors become malignant and may cause local damage, disseminate to distant sites and result in death. We studied changes in the levels of chromatin proteins and changes in telomeres, in cells obtained from mouse gliomas that are deficient in neurofibromin as well as excess brain and nerve tumor tissue from patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 or sporadic tumors lacking neurofibromin expression. A decrease in the levels of these proteins in experimental cell lines resulted in susceptibility to a class of specific drugs knowns as ATR inhibitors, which may represent a specific vulnerability of these tumor subgroups. We expect our data to provide the required rationale for the development of more accurate animal models to study neurofibromatosis, as well as specific molecularly based drugs for treatment as alternatives to the current, often devastating approaches of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Abstract Subsets of Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1)-associated solid tumors have been shown to display high frequencies of ATRX mutations and the presence of alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT). We studied the phenotype of combined NF1 and ATRX deficiency in malignant solid tumors. Cell lines derived from NF1-deficient sporadic glioblastomas (U251, SF188), an NF1-associated ATRX mutant glioblastoma cell line (JHH-NF1-GBM1), an NF1-derived sarcoma cell line (JHH-CRC65), and two NF1-deficient MPNST cell lines (ST88-14, NF90.8) were utilized. Cancer cells were treated with ATR inhibitors, with or without a MEK inhibitor or temozolomide. In contrast to the glioma cell line SF188, combined ATRX knockout (KO) and TERC KO led to ALT-like properties and sensitized U251 glioma cells to ATR inhibition in vitro and in vivo. In addition, ATR inhibitors sensitized U251 cells to temozolomide, but not MEK inhibition, irrespective of ATRX level manipulation; whereas, the JHH-NF1-GBM1 cell line demonstrated sensitivity to ATR inhibition, but not temozolomide. Similar effects were noted using the MPNST cell line NF90.8 after combined ATRX knockdown and TERC KO; however, not in ST88-14. Taken together, our study supports the feasibility of targeting the ATR pathway in subsets of NF1-deficient and associated tumors.

[1]  A. Rehemtulla,et al.  ATRX loss in glioma results in dysregulation of cell-cycle phase transition and ATM inhibitor radio-sensitization. , 2022, Cell reports.

[2]  R. Bindra,et al.  Loss of ATRX confers DNA repair defects and PARP inhibitor sensitivity , 2021, Translational oncology.

[3]  F. Rodriguez,et al.  Conditional reprograming culture conditions facilitate growth of lower grade glioma models. , 2020, Neuro-oncology.

[4]  C. Pratilas,et al.  Combined Inhibition of SHP2 and MEK Is Effective in Models of NF1-Deficient Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors , 2020, Cancer Research.

[5]  F. Westermann,et al.  Therapeutic vulnerabilities in the DNA damage response for the treatment of ATRX mutant neuroblastoma , 2020, EBioMedicine.

[6]  L. Marchionni,et al.  Global microRNA profiling identified miR‐10b‐5p as a regulator of neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1)‐glioma migration , 2020, Neuropathology and applied neurobiology.

[7]  L. Cope,et al.  Functional Loss of ATRX and TERC Activates Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres (ALT) in LAPC4 Prostate Cancer Cells , 2019, Molecular Cancer Research.

[8]  L. Wood,et al.  Telomere alterations in neurofibromatosis type 1-associated solid tumors , 2019, Acta Neuropathologica Communications.

[9]  M. Brindisi,et al.  Raising the bar in anticancer therapy: recent advances in, and perspectives on, telomerase inhibitors. , 2019, Drug discovery today.

[10]  Kristin D. Alfaro,et al.  The molecular landscape of glioma in patients with Neurofibromatosis 1 , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[11]  F. Rodriguez,et al.  Alternative lengthening of telomeres, ATRX loss and H3‐K27M mutations in histologically defined pilocytic astrocytoma with anaplasia , 2018, Brain pathology.

[12]  A. Meeker,et al.  ATRX loss induces multiple hallmarks of the alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) phenotype in human glioma cell lines in a cell line-specific manner , 2018, PloS one.

[13]  G. Riggins,et al.  G-quadruplex DNA drives genomic instability and represents a targetable molecular abnormality in ATRX-deficient malignant glioma , 2018, Nature Communications.

[14]  Jingqin Luo,et al.  Aberrant ATRX protein expression is associated with poor overall survival in NF1-MPNST , 2018, Oncotarget.

[15]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Anaplastic astrocytoma with piloid features, a novel molecular class of IDH wildtype glioma with recurrent MAPK pathway, CDKN2A/B and ATRX alterations , 2018, Acta Neuropathologica.

[16]  J. Parvin,et al.  Differential requirements for DNA repair proteins in immortalized cell lines using alternative lengthening of telomere mechanisms , 2017, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[17]  Xin Hu,et al.  Systematic analysis of telomere length and somatic alterations in 31 cancer types , 2017, Nature Genetics.

[18]  Feng Li,et al.  Switch telomerase to ALT mechanism by inducing telomeric DNA damages and dysfunction of ATRX and DAXX , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[19]  D. Ferguson,et al.  ATRX loss promotes tumor growth and impairs nonhomologous end joining DNA repair in glioma , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.

[20]  H. Gan,et al.  Prolonged disease control with MEK inhibitor in neurofibromatosis type I‐associated glioblastoma , 2016, Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics.

[21]  Chunxiao Zhou,et al.  Knockdown of hTERT and Treatment with BIBR1532 Inhibit Cell Proliferation and Invasion in Endometrial Cancer Cells , 2015, Journal of Cancer.

[22]  L. Karnitz,et al.  Molecular Pathways: Targeting ATR in Cancer Therapy , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[23]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive, Integrative Genomic Analysis of Diffuse Lower-Grade Gliomas. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  R. Reddel,et al.  ATRX represses alternative lengthening of telomeres , 2015, Oncotarget.

[25]  R. Hills,et al.  Telomere fusion threshold identifies a poor prognostic subset of breast cancer patients , 2015, Molecular oncology.

[26]  H. Wakimoto,et al.  Alternative lengthening of telomeres renders cancer cells hypersensitive to ATR inhibitors , 2015, Science.

[27]  V. Iyer,et al.  Efficient genome modification by CRISPR-Cas9 nickase with minimal off-target effects , 2014, Nature Methods.

[28]  Stacey A. Kenfield,et al.  Prostate cancer cell telomere length variability and stromal cell telomere length as prognostic markers for metastasis and death. , 2013, Cancer discovery.

[29]  K. Shin‐ya,et al.  Atrx deficiency induces telomere dysfunction, endocrine defects, and reduced life span. , 2013, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[30]  Gary L. Gallia,et al.  TERT promoter mutations occur frequently in gliomas and a subset of tumors derived from cells with low rates of self-renewal , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  W. Hahn,et al.  Loss of ATRX, Genome Instability, and an Altered DNA Damage Response Are Hallmarks of the Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres Pathway , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[32]  E. Montgomery,et al.  Prevalence of the alternative lengthening of telomeres telomere maintenance mechanism in human cancer subtypes. , 2011, The American journal of pathology.

[33]  R. McLendon,et al.  Altered Telomeres in Tumors with ATRX and DAXX Mutations , 2011, Science.

[34]  Karlyne M. Reilly,et al.  Control of proliferation in astrocytoma cells by the receptor tyrosine kinase/PI3K/AKT signaling axis and the use of PI-103 and TCN as potential anti-astrocytoma therapies. , 2011, Neuro-oncology.

[35]  C. Eberhart,et al.  Hypoxia increases the expression of stem-cell markers and promotes clonogenicity in glioblastoma neurospheres. , 2010, The American journal of pathology.

[36]  Amy Y. M. Au,et al.  DNA C-circles are specific and quantifiable markers of alternative-lengthening-of-telomeres activity , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[37]  Jiangyang Zhang,et al.  NOTCH Pathway Blockade Depletes CD133‐Positive Glioblastoma Cells and Inhibits Growth of Tumor Neurospheres and Xenografts , 2009, Stem cells.

[38]  R. Beroukhim,et al.  Proteasomal and genetic inactivation of the NF1 tumor suppressor in gliomagenesis. , 2009, Cancer cell.

[39]  Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa,et al.  DNER, an Epigenetically Modulated Gene, Regulates Glioblastoma‐Derived Neurosphere Cell Differentiation and Tumor Propagation , 2009, Stem cells.

[40]  T. de Ravel,et al.  Mechanisms in the pathogenesis of malignant tumours in neurofibromatosis type 1. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.

[41]  Paul Workman,et al.  Molecular and Phenotypic Characterisation of Paediatric Glioma Cell Lines as Models for Preclinical Drug Development , 2009, PloS one.

[42]  B. O'neill,et al.  Gliomas in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Clinicopathologic Study of 100 Patients , 2008, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[43]  R. Mirimanoff,et al.  MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[44]  W. Gage,et al.  Telomere length assessment in human archival tissues: combined telomere fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunostaining. , 2002, The American journal of pathology.

[45]  J. Rhim,et al.  Epithelial and Mesenchymal Cell Biology ROCK Inhibitor and Feeder Cells Induce the Conditional Reprogramming of Epithelial Cells , 2012 .