Efficacy of Genetic Algorithm to Investigate Small Scale Aquitard Leakage

The movement of water from a shallow aquifer to a semiconfined aquifer through a localized area of leakage in an aquitard, designated as an aquitard window, is an area of concern in certain gulf coastal plain aquifer settings. Locating these windows, or areas of leakage, has been historically arduous. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of a genetic algorithm (GA) technique as an inverse technique for locating highly probable areas of leakage based upon aquifer head data near the suspected area of leakage. The GA technique has previously been tested on synthetic data alone, and this research offers insight into the capabilities of the technique with actual field data from a site with a known aquitard window. Research sites with historical and ongoing data collection efforts are rare and offer the best opportunity for robust evaluation of new methodologies. Based upon the GA technique, the steady-state accretion flux to the Memphis aquifer at the Shelby Farms study site was determined to be 12,346 m³/day with a standard deviation of 821 m³/day and compared well with the range from 510 to 9,911 m³/day previously determined for the site.

[1]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in Fortran 90: the art of parallel scientific computing, 2nd Edition , 1996, Fortran numerical recipes.

[2]  Henk M. Haitjema,et al.  Comparing a three-dimensional and a Dupuit-Forchheimer solution for a circular recharge area in a confined aquifer , 1987 .

[3]  Charles V. Camp,et al.  Use of GA to determine areas of accretion to semiconfined aquifer , 2001 .

[4]  W. Yeh Review of Parameter Identification Procedures in Groundwater Hydrology: The Inverse Problem , 1986 .

[5]  W. S. Parks Hydrogeology and preliminary assessment of the potential for contamination of the Memphis aquifer in the Memphis area, Tennessee , 1990 .

[6]  W. S. Parks,et al.  Hydrogeology, ground-water quality, and source of ground water causing water-quality changes in the Davis well field at Memphis, Tennessee , 1995 .

[7]  Henk M. Haitjema,et al.  Analytic Element Modeling of Groundwater Flow , 1995 .

[8]  J. W. Castle,et al.  Recognition and Hydrologic Significance of Passive-Margin Updip Sequences: An Example from Eocene Coastal-Plain Deposits, U.S.A. , 2000 .

[9]  Godfrey A. Walters,et al.  Groundwater optimization and parameter estimation by genetic algorithm and dual reciprocity boundary element method , 1996 .

[10]  D. D. Graham,et al.  Potential for leakage among principal aquifers in the Memphis area, Tennessee , 1986 .

[11]  W. Yeh,et al.  Identification of Parameter Structure in Groundwater Inverse Problem , 1985 .

[12]  J. Cherry,et al.  Hydrogeology and hydrochemistry of an aquifer-aquitard system within glacial deposits, Saskatchewan, Canada , 1991 .

[13]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes: FORTRAN , 1988 .

[14]  N. Sun Inverse problems in groundwater modeling , 1994 .

[15]  J. Miller,et al.  Hydrogeologic framework of the Floridan aquifer system in Florida and in parts of Georgia, South Carolina, and Alabama , 1986 .

[16]  J. Bear Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media , 1975 .

[17]  J. Joseph,et al.  The hydrogeology of the Lee Valley and some effects of artificial recharge , 1983, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[18]  W. S. Parks,et al.  Hydrogeology, ground-water quality, and potential for water-supply contamination near the Shelby County landfill in Memphis, Tennessee. Water resources investigation , 1992 .