Extreme Behavioral Adjustments by an Orb-Web Spider to Restricted Spaces

Adaptive flexibility in response to environmental variation is often advantageous and occurs in many types of traits in many species. Although the basic designs of the orb webs of a given species are relatively uniform, spiders can adjust their webs to some types of environmental variation. This study of adult female Leucauge argyra tests the extremes to which they can adjust with respect to reduced area in which to build, and documents probably the most pronounced flexibility in orb design ever recorded. These adjustments revealed several behavioral rules that guide orb construction behavior. Spiders adjusted at least seven probably independent aspects of orb design when confined in tiny spaces that spanned about 7% of the maximum distance normally spanned by webs in the field and that had diameters that were only about three times the length of the spider itself. Webs in intermediate sized containers had intermediate designs, and many of the adjustments appear to result from extensions of the behavioral rules guiding orb construction in less severely restricted spaces in the field.

[1]  Samuel Zschokke,et al.  Prey-capture strategies in sympatric web-building spiders , 2006 .

[2]  M. O. Gonzaga,et al.  Parasitoid-induced mortality of Araneus omnicolor (Araneae, Araneidae) by Hymenoepimecis sp. (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) in southeastern Brazil , 2007, Naturwissenschaften.

[3]  Fritz Vollrath,et al.  Analysis and interpretation of orb spider exploration and web-building behavior , 1992 .

[4]  P. Witt,et al.  Do We Live in the Best of All Worlds?: Spider Webs Suggest an Answer , 2015, Perspectives in biology and medicine.

[5]  G. Wagner,et al.  NOVELTY IN EVOLUTION: RESTRUCTURING THE CONCEPT , 1991 .

[6]  C. Krebs,et al.  Measuring the ghost of competition: Insights from density-dependent habitat selection on the co-existence and dynamics of lemmings , 2000 .

[7]  W. Eberhard Recovery of spiders from the effects of parasitic wasps: implications for fine-tuned mechanisms of manipulation , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  D. Hochuli,et al.  Habitat selection and web plasticity by the orb spider Argiope keyserlingi (Argiopidae): Do they compromise foraging success for predator avoidance? , 2007 .

[9]  G. Uetz,et al.  Spacing in Colonial Spiders: Effects of Environment and Experience , 2010 .

[10]  W. Eberhard The Natural History and Behavior of Hymenoepimecis argyraphaga (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) a Parasitoid of Plesiometa argyra (Araneae: Tetragnathidae) , 2000 .

[11]  W. Eberhard UNDER THE INFLUENCE: WEBS AND BUILDING BEHAVIOR OF PLESIOMETA ARGYRA (ARANEAE, TETRAGNATHIDAE) WHEN PARASITIZED BY HYMENOEPIMECIS ARGYRAPHAGA (HYMENOPTERA, ICHNEUMONIDAE) , 2001 .

[12]  T. Krink,et al.  Optimal Area Use in Orb Webs of the Spider Araneus diadematus , 2000, Naturwissenschaften.

[13]  R. Hingston A naturalist in Himalaya, by R. W. G. Hingston. , 2022 .

[14]  R. Matsumoto,et al.  Life histories of two ichneumonid parasitoids of Cyclosa octotuberculata (Araneae): Reclinervellus tuberculatus (Uchida) and its new sympatric congener (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Pimplinae) , 2007 .

[15]  L. Higgins Developmental changes in barrier web structure under different levels of predation risk inNephila clavipes (Araneae: Tetragnathidae) , 1992, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[16]  M. Elgar,et al.  Foraging strategies and feeding regimes: Web and decoration investment in Argiope keyserlingi Karsch (Araneae: Araneidae) , 2000 .

[17]  J. Coddington The Monophyletic Origin of the Orb Web , 1986 .

[18]  S. Gould,et al.  The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[19]  Thomas Hesselberg,et al.  Ontogenetic Changes in Web Design in Two Orb‐Web Spiders , 2010 .

[20]  M. Herberstein,et al.  Spider webs: Evolution, diversity and plasticity , 2011 .

[21]  H. Japyassú,et al.  From Complete Orb to Semi-Orb Webs: Developmental Transitions in the Web of Nephilengys Cruentata (Araneae: Tetragnathidae) , 1998 .

[22]  P N Witt,et al.  Experience and the orb web. , 1970, Developmental psychobiology.

[23]  Marie E. Herberstein,et al.  Interpretations of orb-web variability: A review of past and current ideas , 2000 .

[24]  William G. Eberhard,et al.  The web of Uloborus diversus (Araneae: Uloboridae) , 2009 .

[25]  William G. Eberhard,et al.  Function and Phylogeny of Spider Webs , 1990 .

[26]  A. Pasquet,et al.  Influences of aggregative behaviour on space occupation in the spider Zygiella x-notata (Clerck) , 1987, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[27]  R. Gillespie The role of prey availability in aggregative behaviour of the orb weaving spider Tetragnatha elongata , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  A. Aisenberg,et al.  Sexual behavior, cannibalism, and mating plugs as sticky traps in the orb weaver spider Leucauge argyra (Tetragnathidae) , 2011, Naturwissenschaften.

[29]  William G. Eberhard,et al.  Early stages of orb construction by Philoponella vicina, Leucauge mariana, and Nephila clavipes (Araneae, Uloboridae and Tetragnathidae), and their phylogenetic implications , 1990 .

[30]  R. Buskirk,et al.  A trap-building predator exhibits different tactics for different aspects of foraging behaviour , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  W. Eberhard,et al.  Modification of Nephila clavipes (Araneae Nephilidae) webs induced by the parasitoids Hymenoepimecis bicolor and H. robertsae (Hymenoptera Ichneumonidae) , 2010 .

[32]  Peter N. Witt,et al.  A Spider’s Web , 1968, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[33]  M. Herberstein,et al.  Asymmetry in spider orb webs: a result of physical constraints? , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  M. Herberstein,et al.  Taking it to extremes: what drives extreme web elongation in Australian ladder web spiders (Araneidae: Telaprocera maudae)? , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[35]  J. Coddington,et al.  Phylogeny of extant nephilid orb‐weaving spiders (Araneae, Nephilidae): testing morphological and ethological homologies , 2008 .

[36]  W. Eberhard BEHAVIORAL FLEXIBILITY IN ORB WEB CONSTRUCTION: EFFECTS OF SUPPLIES IN DIFFERENT SILK GLANDS AND SPIDER SIZE AND WEIGHT , 1988 .

[37]  William G. Eberhard,et al.  Memory of distances and directions moved as cues during temporary spiral construction in the spiderLeucauge mariana (Araneae: Araneidae) , 2005, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[38]  C. P. Sandoval,et al.  Plasticity in web design in the spider Parawixia bistriata : a response to variable prey type , 1994 .

[39]  William G. Eberhard,et al.  Cues Guiding Placement of the First Loop of the Sticky Spiral in Orbs of Micrathena Duodecimspinosa (Araneidae) and Leucauge mariana (Tetragnathidae) , 2012 .

[40]  Linden E. Higgins,et al.  Variation in foraging investment during the intermolt interval and before egg-laying in the spiderNephila clavipes (Araneae: Araneidae) , 1990, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[41]  C. Rica.,et al.  Miniaturized orb-weaving spiders: behavioural precision is not limited by small size , 2007 .

[42]  M. West-Eberhard Developmental plasticity and evolution , 2003 .