Insights into design concept similarity judgements

Similarity has been shown to influence various measures of outcome creativity in combinatorial design tasks, but the role of similarity during the combination of design concepts is unknown. As an initial step towards understanding design concept similarity we review prominent models of similarity processing, highlight challenges with adoption in a design context, and carry out an exploratory experimental investigation of design concept similarity perception. Similarity may be the result of structural alignment processing and similarity ratings appear to vary with the number of commonalities.

[1]  M. J. Wilkenfeld,et al.  Similarity and emergence in conceptual combination , 2001 .

[2]  D. Medin,et al.  Birds of a Feather Flock Together: Similarity Judgments with Semantically Rich Stimuli , 1997 .

[3]  Georges M. Fadel,et al.  Affordance-Based Methods for Design , 2003 .

[4]  T. Taura,et al.  Concept blending and dissimilarity: factors for creative concept generation process , 2009 .

[6]  Alex H. B. Duffy,et al.  Towards a shared ontology: A generic classification of cognitive processes in conceptual design , 2017, Design Science.

[7]  Zachary Estes,et al.  Thematic relations affect similarity via commonalities. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[9]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  The Meaning of “Near” and “Far”: The Impact of Structuring Design Databases and the Effect of Distance of Analogy on Design Output , 2012 .

[10]  Yang Maria,et al.  Interplay Of Sketching & Prototyping In Early Stage Product Design , 2016 .

[11]  Laura Hay Creative design engineering: introduction to an interdisciplinary approach , 2016 .

[12]  Miriam Bassok,et al.  What Makes a Man Similar to a Tie? Stimulus Compatibility with Comparison and Integration , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  David W. Rosen,et al.  The effects of biological examples in idea generation , 2010 .

[14]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  A Quantitative Similarity Metric for Design-by-Analogy , 2002 .

[15]  G. Murphy,et al.  Thematic relations in adults' concepts. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Similarity is like analogy: Structural alignment in comparison , 1995 .

[17]  D. Gentner,et al.  Splitting the Differences: A Structural Alignment View of Similarity , 1993 .

[18]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design : Ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples , 2011 .

[19]  A. Markman,et al.  Similar and Different : The Differentiation of Basic-Level Categories , 1997 .

[20]  Z. Estes,et al.  Thematic thinking : the apprehension and consequences of thematic relations , 2011 .

[21]  D. Gentner,et al.  Commonalities and differences in similarity comparisons , 1996, Memory & cognition.