Randomized clinical trials. Perspectives on some recent ideas.

In spite of the controversy over the role of randomized clinical trials in medical research, the rationale underlying such trials remains persuasive as compared to recent suggestions for alternative non-randomized studies such as those relying on the use of historical controls and adjustment technics. Others have suggested that recent statistical innovations for improving clinical trials, including adaptive allocation of treatment to patients and sequential stopping procedures, are underutilized. These innovations, though theoretically interesting, are not easily adapted to large-scale, complex medical trials in which there may be multiple end points and delayed response times. Ethical considerations suggest that randomized trials are more suitable than uncontrolled experimentation in protecting the interests of patients. Randomized clinical trials remain the most reliable method for evaluating the efficacy of therapies.

[1]  H Robbins,et al.  A SEQUENTIAL DECISION PROBLEM WITH A FINITE MEMORY. , 1956, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  J. Isbell.  On a Problem of Robbins , 1959 .

[3]  M. Schneiderman.  Looking backward: is it worth the crick in the neck? or: pitfalls in using retrospective data. , 1966, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[4]  T. Chalmers,et al.  The present status of shunts for portal hypertension in cirrhosis. , 1966, Gastroenterology.

[5]  M A Schneiderman,et al.  The role of hypothesis testing in clinical trials. Biometrics seminar. , 1966, Journal of chronic diseases.

[6]  Measurement in medicine. The interpretation of numerical data. , 1972 .

[7]  James E. Grizzle,et al.  A Cooperative Double-Blind Evaluation of Gastric Freezing in the Treatment of Duodenal Ulcer , 1969 .

[8]  J Cornfield,et al.  The Bayesian outlook and its application. , 1969, Biometrics.

[9]  Day Ne.  Two-stage designs for clinical trials. , 1969 .

[10]  T C Chalmers,et al.  ETHICS IN COOPERATIVE CLINICAL TRIALS , 1970, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[11]  J B Block,et al.  Controlled studies in clinical cancer research. , 1972, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  K. S. Hurst,et al.  An analysis of the effects of changes from the assigned treatment in a clinical trial of treatment for prostatic cancer. , 1973, Journal of chronic diseases.

[13]  M. Gail.  Value systems for comparing two independent multinomial trials , 1974 .

[14]  P Armitage,et al.  Statistical methods for the identification and use of prognostic factors , 1974, International journal of cancer.

[15]  E. Gehan,et al.  Non-randomized controls in cancer clinical trials. , 1974, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  M C Weinstein,et al.  Allocation of subjects in medical experiments. , 1974, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  S. Pocock,et al.  Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. , 1975, Biometrics.

[18]  P. Meier,et al.  Statistics and medical experimentation. , 1975, Biometrics.

[19]  G. Weiss,et al.  Sequential analysis of binomial clinical trials , 1975 .

[20]  P. Armitage.  Sequential Medical Trials , 1961, Biomedicine / [publiee pour l'A.A.I.C.I.G.].