Aircraft structures experience various kinds of loads over their entire lifetime, leading to fatigue and ultimately structural failure. In order to avoid structural failures during operation, the maximum number of flight cycles and flight hours is regulated by laws ensuring continued airworthiness. However, since every flight impacts the aircraft differently, not all airframes have been equally stressed at the time of decommissioning. Therefore, a new retirement criterion based on the fatigue damage index (FDI) is proposed. The criterion takes into account that aircraft are differently operated and thus enables an individual decommissioning of aircraft without compromising its safety. Based on aircraft sample data covering 95% of the Airbus A320 fleet over two years, the enhanced decommissioning criterion is estimated to significantly extend the average aircraft service life. The impact varies within the fleet, depending on the experienced seat load factors, cruise altitudes, and taxi times considered for the individual aircraft during operation. While seat load factors and flight altitudes significantly affect the defined FDI, the influence of taxi times is only minor. Based on the estimated increase in aircraft service life, the paper at hand motivates that for service life extensions, the FDI shall be considered as the limit of validity in the regulatory framework governing the decommissioning of aircraft.
[1]
E. W. C. Wilkins,et al.
Cumulative damage in fatigue
,
1956
.
[2]
Michael W. Tretheway,et al.
The aviation value chain: Economic returns and policy issues
,
2014
.
[3]
Wieslaw J. Staszewski,et al.
Health Monitoring Of Aerospace Structures: Smart Sensor Technologies And Signal Processing
,
2017
.
[4]
S. R. Hunt,et al.
Validation of the Eurofighter Typhoon structural health and usage monitoring system
,
2001
.
[5]
R A Collins.
Ensuring the continued structural airworthiness of the Airbus A300 commercial transport aircraft
,
1999
.
[6]
V. Ladda,et al.
The Operational Loads Monitoring System, OLMS,
,
1991
.
[7]
R. Eastin,et al.
'WFD' ― What is it and what's 'LOV' got to do with it?
,
2009
.
[8]
Christian Boller,et al.
Ways and options for aircraft structural health management
,
2001
.
[9]
P. Amabile,et al.
Proposal for the New Fatigue Management System for the AMX
,
1991
.