Deciphering Interactions in Moving Animal Groups

Collective motion phenomena in large groups of social organisms have long fascinated the observer, especially in cases, such as bird flocks or fish schools, where large-scale highly coordinated actions emerge in the absence of obvious leaders. However, the mechanisms involved in this self-organized behavior are still poorly understood, because the individual-level interactions underlying them remain elusive. Here, we demonstrate the power of a bottom-up methodology to build models for animal group motion from data gathered at the individual scale. Using video tracks of fish shoal in a tank, we show how a careful, incremental analysis at the local scale allows for the determination of the stimulus/response function governing an individual's moving decisions. We find in particular that both positional and orientational effects are present, act upon the fish turning speed, and depend on the swimming speed, yielding a novel schooling model whose parameters are all estimated from data. Our approach also leads to identify a density-dependent effect that results in a behavioral change for the largest groups considered. This suggests that, in confined environment, the behavioral state of fish and their reaction patterns change with group size. We debate the applicability, beyond the particular case studied here, of this novel framework for deciphering interactions in moving animal groups.

[1]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[2]  Yutaka Sumino,et al.  Large-scale vortex lattice emerging from collectively moving microtubules , 2012, Nature.

[3]  W. Bialek,et al.  Statistical mechanics for natural flocks of birds , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  D. Sumpter,et al.  Inferring the rules of interaction of shoaling fish , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  I. Couzin,et al.  Inferring the structure and dynamics of interactions in schooling fish , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  How simple rules determine pedestrian behavior and crowd disasters , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Qi Zhao,et al.  Automated 3D trajectory measuring of large numbers of moving particles. , 2011, Optics express.

[8]  T. Ihle Kinetic theory of flocking: derivation of hydrodynamic equations. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  D. Sumpter Collective Animal Behavior , 2010 .

[10]  Erwin Frey,et al.  Polar patterns of driven filaments , 2010, Nature.

[11]  Michael H. Dickinson,et al.  Multi-camera real-time three-dimensional tracking of multiple flying animals , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[12]  H. Chaté,et al.  Relevance of metric-free interactions in flocking phenomena. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[13]  Leah Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Inferring individual rules from collective behavior , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  S. Ramaswamy The Mechanics and Statistics of Active Matter , 2010, 1004.1933.

[15]  Hugues Chaté,et al.  Collective motion of vibrated polar disks. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[16]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks , 2010, Nature.

[17]  H. Swinney,et al.  Collective motion and density fluctuations in bacterial colonies , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Markus Bär,et al.  Large-scale collective properties of self-propelled rods. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[19]  Martin Nilsson Jacobi,et al.  Determining interaction rules in animal swarms , 2010 .

[20]  James J. Anderson,et al.  Collective motion in animal groups from a neurobiological perspective: the adaptive benefits of dynamic sensory loads and selective attention. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  Michel Droz,et al.  Hydrodynamic equations for self-propelled particles: microscopic derivation and stability analysis , 2009, 0907.4688.

[22]  G. Theraulaz,et al.  Analyzing fish movement as a persistent turning walker , 2009, Journal of mathematical biology.

[23]  Stephen J. Simpson,et al.  Serotonin Mediates Behavioral Gregarization Underlying Swarm Formation in Desert Locusts , 2009, Science.

[24]  H. Chaté,et al.  Collective motion of self-propelled particles interacting without cohesion. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[25]  G. Parisi,et al.  Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  M Cristina Marchetti,et al.  Hydrodynamics of self-propelled hard rods. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[27]  Vijay Narayan,et al.  Long-Lived Giant Number Fluctuations in a Swarming Granular Nematic , 2007, Science.

[28]  J. Toner,et al.  Hydrodynamics and phases of flocks , 2005 .

[29]  Julia K. Parrish,et al.  Self-Organisation and Evolution of Social Systems: Traffic rules of fish schools: a review of agent-based approaches , 2005 .

[30]  S. Levin,et al.  Dynamics of fish shoals: identifying key decision rules , 2004 .

[31]  Y. Tu,et al.  Moving and staying together without a leader , 2003, cond-mat/0401257.

[32]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Self-Organization in Biological Systems , 2001, Princeton studies in complexity.

[33]  I. Couzin,et al.  Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[34]  Iain D. Couzin,et al.  Self‐Organization in Biological Systems.Princeton Studies in Complexity. ByScott Camazine,, Jean‐Louis Deneubourg,, Nigel R Franks,, James Sneyd,, Guy Theraulaz, and, Eric Bonabeau; original line drawings by, William Ristineand, Mary Ellen Didion; StarLogo programming by, William Thies. Princeton (N , 2002 .

[35]  Yoshinobu Inada,et al.  Order and flexibility in the motion of fish schools. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[36]  Neha Bhooshan,et al.  The Simulation of the Movement of Fish Schools , 2001 .

[37]  J. Steffensen,et al.  The effect of progressive hypoxia on swimming activity and schooling in Atlantic herring , 2000 .

[38]  Herbert Levine,et al.  Cooperative self-organization of microorganisms , 2000 .

[39]  L. Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Complexity, pattern, and evolutionary trade-offs in animal aggregation. , 1999, Science.

[40]  J. Hutchinson Animal groups in three dimensions , 1999 .

[41]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[42]  A. Magurran,et al.  The adaptive significance of schooling as an anti-predator defense in fish , 1990 .

[43]  A. Armario,et al.  Effect of crowding on some physiological and behavioral variables in adult male rats , 1984, Physiology & Behavior.

[44]  I. Aoki A simulation study on the schooling mechanism in fish. , 1982 .

[45]  C. Hemmings,et al.  OLFACTION AND VISION IN FISH SCHOOLING , 1966 .

[46]  E. Shaw,et al.  The optomotor reaction of schooling carangid fishes. , 1965, Animal behaviour.

[47]  Charles M. Breder,et al.  Studies on social groupings in fishes. Bulletin of the AMNH ; v. 117, article 6 , 1959 .

[48]  Charles M. Breder Studies on the structure of the fish school. Bulletin of the AMNH ; v. 98, article 1 , 1951 .