Universities as local knowledge hubs under different technology regimes â New evidence from academic patenting

It is often claimed that universities act as local knowledge factories. Although this function is largely analyzed in previous research, there still is a knowledge gap regarding the role of a technological match between the profiles of partners in university-industry interactions. In addition, the effects of different knowledge dynamics in technological regimes remain under-researched. In this paper, we thus draw special attention to the question how geographical distance and the specific role of a technological fit between the knowledge provided by the university and the technological needs of the local industry affects interactions between universities and firms. Thereby, we differentiate between six technological regimes constituted by different knowledge dynamics. Our analyses are based on a unique dataset containing all German universities’ academic patenting and publication activities. As these are further enriched by secondary data, they enable us to show that the technological fit between a university and its surrounding region (in terms of local industry needs) indeed has a significant influence on a university’s innovation-related research interactions, especially with small firms. We further show that this effect additionally depends on the underlying knowledge base in heterogeneous technological regimes.

[1]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there) , 2003 .

[2]  Sidonia von Proff,et al.  Inventor collaboration over distance: a comparison of academic and corporate patents , 2013, Scientometrics.

[3]  B. Lundvall,et al.  Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation , 2007 .

[4]  Universities and Regional Development , 2009 .

[5]  A. Neely,et al.  Gaining from interactions with universities: multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity , 2008 .

[6]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Collaborative Networks as Determinants of Knowledge Diffusion Patterns , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[7]  M. Feldman,et al.  Entpreprenerial Universities and Technology Transfer: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Knowledge-Based Economic Development , 2006 .

[8]  Ulrich Schmoch,et al.  Identification of university-based patents: A new large-scale approach , 2013 .

[9]  A. Salter,et al.  Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration , 2009 .

[10]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technological Paradigms and Trajectories , 2007 .

[11]  Jesper Manniche,et al.  Combinatorial Knowledge Dynamics: On the Usefulness of the Differentiated Knowledge Bases Model , 2012 .

[12]  R. Tijssen,et al.  Relational arenas in a regional Higher Education system: Insights from an empirical analysis , 2012 .

[13]  L. Vaccarezza.  The new production of knowledge. The dinamics of science and research in contemporary societies, Michael Gibbons, Camille Limoges, Hega Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott y Martin Trow, Londres, SAGE Publications, 1994, 179 páginas. , 1995 .

[14]  F. Narin,et al.  Science and Technology as Predictors of Stock Performance , 1999 .

[15]  Tom Broekel,et al.  The Regional Dimension of Knowledge Transfers—A Behavioral Approach , 2007 .

[16]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Academic patents as an indicator of useful research? A new approach to measure academic inventiveness , 2003 .

[17]  Alice Lam.  Knowledge Networks and Careers: Academic Scientists in Industry-University Links , 2007 .

[18]  Christian Zeller,et al.  Project Teams as Means of Restructuring Research and Development in the Pharmaceutical Industry , 2002 .

[19]  R. Boschma.  Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2005 .

[20]  Bj⊘rn Asheim,et al.  Face-to-Face, Buzz, and Knowledge Bases: Sociospatial Implications for Learning, Innovation, and Innovation Policy , 2007 .

[21]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Science, Social Networks and Spillovers , 2006 .

[22]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Gone but not Forgotten: Knowledge Flows, Labor Mobility, and Enduring Social Relationships , 2006 .

[23]  M. Perkmann,et al.  The Two Faces of Collaboration: Impacts of University-Industry Relations on Public Research , 2009 .

[24]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories , 1993 .

[25]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[26]  A. Torre.  On the Role Played by Temporary Geographical Proximity in Knowledge Transmission , 2008 .

[27]  S. Breschi,et al.  Mobility of Skilled Workers and Co-Invention Networks: An Anatomy of Localized Knowledge Flows , 2009 .

[28]  Maria Theresa Larsen.  The implications of academic enterprise for public science: An overview of the empirical evidence , 2011 .

[29]  F. Malerba,et al.  Technological Regimes and Firm Bebavior , 1993 .

[30]  Alexander Kaufmann,et al.  Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions , 2008 .

[31]  S. Bagchi‐Sen,et al.  The research university, entrepreneurship and regional development: Research propositions and current evidence , 2012 .

[32]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Complexity, Networks and Knowledge Flow , 2002 .

[33]  R. Ponds,et al.  The limits to internationalization of scientific research collaboration , 2009 .

[34]  Rossi Federica,et al.  Changes to university IPR regulations in Europe and the impact on academic patenting , 2010 .

[35]  M. Feldman,et al.  The commercialization of academic patents: black boxes, pipelines, and Rubik’s cubes , 2010 .

[36]  Patrick Llerena,et al.  Academic patenting in Europe: new evidence from the KEINS database , 2008 .

[37]  F. V. Vught.  Mapping the Higher Education Landscape , 2009 .

[38]  Brigitte Günterberg,et al.  SMEs in Germany: Facts and figures 2004 , 2004 .

[39]  B. Asheim.  DIFFERENTIATED KNOWLEDGE BASES AND VARIETIES OF REGIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS , 2007 .

[40]  F. Vught.  Mapping the Higher Education Landscape; Towards a European Classification of Higher Education , 2009 .

[41]  Jannika Mattes,et al.  Dimensions of Proximity and Knowledge Bases: Innovation between Spatial and Non-spatial Factors , 2012 .

[42]  Bj⊘rn Asheim,et al.  Explaining Spatial Patterns of Innovation: Analytical and Synthetic Modes of Knowledge Creation in the Medicon Valley Life-Science Cluster , 2008 .

[43]  Harvey Goldstein,et al.  Assessing the Regional Economic Development Impacts of Universities: A Review of Current Approaches , 2007 .

[44]  Bj⊘rn Asheim,et al.  Knowledge bases and Regional Innovation Systems: Comparing Nordic Clusters. , 2005 .

[45]  A. Malmberg,et al.  (How) Do (Firms in) Clusters Create Knowledge? , 2005 .

[46]  Richard Williams,et al.  Using the Margins Command to Estimate and Interpret Adjusted Predictions and Marginal Effects , 2012 .

[47]  Francisco Lima,et al.  Cooperation in innovation activities: The importance of partners , 2010 .

[48]  Christian Richter Østergaard,et al.  Knowledge flows through social networks in a cluster: Comparing university and industry links , 2009 .

[49]  S. Breschi,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers And Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey , 2001 .

[50]  Keld Laursen,et al.  Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialization , 2015 .

[51]  R. Merton.  Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. , 1957 .

[52]  Elvira Uyarra,et al.  Conceptualizing the Regional Roles of Universities, Implications and Contradictions , 2010 .

[53]  Ulrich Schmoch,et al.  Opening the Black Box , 2004 .

[54]  M. Feldman,et al.  Fishing upstream: Firm innovation strategy and university research alliances , 2007 .

[55]  J. Youtie,et al.  Building an innovation hub: A case study of the transformation of university roles in regional technological and economic development , 2008 .