Media Selection as a Strategic Component of Communication

Why do people select the media they choose for a particular type of communication? The media choice literature has considered myriad contextual factors that influence media choice, from proximity of the communication partners, to the urgency of the situation, to time pressure, and so on. From this body of work, a contingency-based theory of media choice has emerged. An alternative approach is to investigate how communication strategies and media characteristics affect choice. We identified two approaches for investigating these issues: Te'eni's (2001) model of organizational communication and Dennis et al.'s (2008) media synchronicity theory. Using a scenario-based methodology, we asked respondents which medium they would use for a deceptive communication task and why they made that choice. We analyzed the data from the perspective of both the Te'eni and MST frameworks, enabling us to compare the extent to which each was able to explain our respondents' media choices. Both frameworks, at differing levels of communication granularity, suggest that the intent of the communication drives a strategy that ultimately informs media choice. The results suggest that the prior contingency-based explanations of media choice could be improved by not only understanding the intent of the communication, but also the strategy used by an individual to execute this communication. Additionally, we found that the more finely grained view of communication contained in MST explained more of the outcomes and was more parsimonious as well.

[1]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  Deception Detection and Relationship Development: The Other Side of Trust , 1986 .

[2]  S. Grover,et al.  The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth: The causes and management of workplace lying , 2005 .

[3]  Alton Yeow-Kuan Chua,et al.  Choosing communication portfolios to accomplish tasks: The effects of individual differences , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[4]  J. Burgoon,et al.  The Dynamic Nature of Deceptive Verbal Communication , 2006 .

[5]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Media Appropriateness in the Conduct and Discovery of Deceptive Communication: The Relative Influence of Richness and Synchronicity , 2004 .

[6]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Introducing chat into business organizations: toward an instant messaging maturity model , 2003, GROUP '03.

[7]  James J. Lindsay,et al.  Cues to deception. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Lying in everyday life. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Jane S. Webster,et al.  Rational and social theories as complementary explanations of communication media choices: two polic , 1995 .

[10]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  An Investigation of Media Selection Among Directors and Managers: From "Self" to "Other" Orientation , 1998, MIS Q..

[11]  Aldert Vrij,et al.  Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities, 2nd ed. , 2008 .

[12]  Alistair Ross,et al.  Making Connections , 1991, Health devices.

[13]  Fred Niederman,et al.  IT Project Managers' Perceptions and Use of Virtual Team Technologies , 2004, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[14]  S. Murray,et al.  Knowledge Type and Communication Media Choice in the Knowledge Transfer Process , 2007 .

[15]  Andrew F. Simon.  Computer-Mediated Communication: Task Performance and Satisfaction , 2006, The Journal of social psychology.

[16]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Impression Management 2.0 , 2008, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..

[17]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[18]  France Bélanger,et al.  Communication Media Repertoires: Dealing with the Multiplicity of Media Choices , 2007, MIS Q..

[19]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Deception in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2004 .

[20]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity , 2008, MIS Q..

[21]  M. Markus.  Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .

[22]  J. George,et al.  Deception and Computer-Mediated Communication in Daily Life , 2008 .

[23]  C. Steinfield,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Technology use , 1990 .

[24]  Rieko Maruta Richardson,et al.  The influence of high/low-context culture and power distance on choice of communication media: Students’ media choice to communicate with Professors in Japan and America , 2007 .

[25]  J. Webster,et al.  Making Connections: Complementary Influences on Communication Media Choices, Attitudes, and Use , 2000 .

[26]  Eric Seemann,et al.  Cognitive mechanisms underlying lying to questions: response time as a cue to deception , 2003 .

[27]  Timothy R. Levine,et al.  How people really detect lies , 2002 .

[28]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Opportunities for Strategic Information Manipulation through New Information Technology , 1990 .

[29]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Managerial Work: Analysis from Observation , 1971 .

[30]  Ruth C. King,et al.  Media Appropriateness: Effects of Experience on Communication Media Choice , 1997 .

[31]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Note—Mintzberg was Right!: A Replication and Extension of The Nature of Managerial Work , 1983 .

[32]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[33]  P. Ekman,et al.  Nonverbal Leakage and Clues to Deception †. , 1969, Psychiatry.

[34]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Accuracy of Deception Judgments , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[35]  T. Levine,et al.  When lovers become leery: The relationship between suspicion and accuracy in detecting deception , 1990 .

[36]  R. Daft,et al.  Understanding Managers' Media Choices: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective , 1990 .

[37]  D. Straub,et al.  Knowledge Worker Communications and Recipient Availability: Toward a Task Closure Explanation of Media Choice , 1998 .

[38]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Deception and design: the impact of communication technology on lying behavior , 2004, CHI.

[39]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[40]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions , 1999 .

[41]  Vivian C. Sheer,et al.  Improving Media Richness Theory , 2004 .

[42]  Dov Te'eni,et al.  Review: A Cognitive-Affective Model of Organizational Communication for Designing IT , 2001, MIS Q..

[43]  Zoonky Lee,et al.  Cultural Implications of Electronic Communication Usage: A Theory-Based Empirical Analysis , 2003, ICIS.

[44]  L. Anolli,et al.  Linguistic Styles in Deceptive Communication: Dubitative Ambiguity and Elliptic Eluding in Packaged Lies , 2003 .

[45]  Harry Bouwman,et al.  Content and context: an exploration of the basic characteristics of information needs , 2002, New Media Soc..

[46]  K. Eisenhardt.  Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[47]  Joanne Arciuli,et al.  “Um, I can tell you're lying”: Linguistic markers of deception versus truth-telling in speech , 2010, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[48]  R. Daft,et al.  Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations , 1987 .

[49]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Interpersonal Deception Theory , 1996 .