Citizen Science in the Age of Neogeography: Utilizing Volunteered Geographic Information for Environmental Monitoring

The interface between neogeography and citizen science has great potential for environmental monitoring, but this nexus has been explored less often than each subject individually. In this article we review the emerging role of volunteered geographic information in citizen science and present a case study of an integrated tool set that engages multiple types of users (from targeted citizen-based observation networks, expert-driven focused monitoring, and opportunistic crowdsourcing efforts) in monitoring a forest disease in the western United States. We first introduce the overall challenge of data collection in environmental monitoring projects and then discuss the literature surrounding an emergent integration of citizen science and volunteered geographical information. We next explore how these methods characterize and underpin knowledge discovery and how multimodal interaction is supported so that a large spectrum of contributors can be included. These concepts are summarized in a conceptual model that articulates the important gradients of Web-based environmental monitoring: the users, the interaction between users and data, and the types of information generated. Using this model, we critically examine OakMapper.org, a Web site created by the authors to collect and distribute spatial information related to the spread of a forest disease, and discuss many of the core issues and new challenges presented by the intersection of citizen science and volunteered geographic information in the context of environmental monitoring. We argue that environmental monitoring can benefit from this synergy: The increased emphasis on a diversity of participants in knowledge production might help to reduce the gaps that have in the past divided the public, researchers, and policymakers in such efforts.

[1]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1986 .

[2]  W A Wulf,et al.  The collaboratory opportunity. , 1993, Science.

[3]  N. Peluso WHOSE WOODS ARE THESE? COUNTER‐MAPPING FOREST TERRITORIES IN KALIMANTAN, INDONESIA , 1995 .

[4]  A. Irwin Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development , 1995 .

[5]  Ensuring sustainability of natural resources: focus on institutional arrangements , 1996 .

[6]  Claire Beesley,et al.  Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems , 1996 .

[7]  James D. Myers,et al.  Collaboratories: Doing Science on the Internet , 1996, Computer.

[8]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Towards a geography of geographic information in a digital world , 1997 .

[9]  Trevor M. Harris,et al.  Empowerment, Marginalization, and "Community-integrated" GIS , 1998 .

[10]  Nancy J. Obermeyer,et al.  The Evolution of Public Participation GIS , 1998 .

[11]  M. Curry Digital Places: Living with Geographic Information Technologies , 1998 .

[12]  Daniel Weiner,et al.  Community-integrated GIS for Land Reform in South Africa , 1999 .

[13]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing trust into online experiences , 2000, CACM.

[14]  Zhong-Ren Peng,et al.  Internet GIS for Public Participation , 2001 .

[15]  Piotr Jankowski,et al.  GIS-Supported Collaborative Decision Making: Results of an Experiment , 2001 .

[16]  Sulin Ba,et al.  Establishing Online Trust Through a Community Responsibility System , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[17]  David P. Anderson,et al.  SETI@home: an experiment in public-resource computing , 2002, CACM.

[18]  Christian Payne,et al.  On the security of open source software , 2002, Inf. Syst. J..

[19]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects , 2003 .

[20]  David M. Rizzo,et al.  Sudden oak death: endangering California and Oregon forest ecosystems , 2003 .

[21]  Faith R. Kearns,et al.  Everything happens somewhere: using webGIS as a tool for sustainable natural resource management , 2003 .

[22]  Renee Sieber,et al.  Public participation geographic information systems across borders , 2003 .

[23]  Sara Irina Fabrikant,et al.  Spatialization Methods: A Cartographic Research Agenda for Non-geographic Information Visualization , 2003 .

[24]  N. M. Kelly,et al.  "WebGIS for monitoring "sudden oak death" in coastal California": [Computers, Environment and Urban Systems (this issue)] , 2003, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[25]  N. M. Kelly,et al.  WebGIS for Monitoring "Sudden Oak Death" in coastal California , 2003, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[26]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Community, Joining, and Specialization in Open Source Software Innovation: A Case Study , 2003 .

[27]  Brice X Semmens,et al.  Conservation and management applications of the REEF volunteer fish monitoring program. , 2003, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[28]  Geoffrey Anderson,et al.  Building Web‐Based Spatial Information Solutions around Open Specifications and Open Source Software , 2003, Trans. GIS.

[29]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Community, Joining, and Specialization in Open Source Software Innovation: A Case Study , 2003 .

[30]  Stephen Marsh,et al.  The role of trust in information science and technology , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[31]  S. Taylor Jarnagin,et al.  A Modeling Approach for Estimating Watershed Impervious Surface Area from National Land Cover Data 92 , 2004 .

[32]  Q. Guo,et al.  A comparison of standard and hybrid classifier methods for mapping hardwood mortality in areas affected by sudden oak death , 2004 .

[33]  Mark Gahegan,et al.  Geovisualization for knowledge construction and decision support , 2004, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[34]  Faith R. Kearns,et al.  Geospatial Informatics for Management of a New Forest Disease: Sudden Oak Death , 2004 .

[35]  N. M. Kelly,et al.  Sudden oak death in California: Disease progression in oaks and tanoaks , 2005 .

[36]  C. Lepczyk Integrating published data and citizen science to describe bird diversity across a landscape , 2005 .

[37]  Finn Danielsen,et al.  Does Monitoring Matter? A Quantitative Assessment of Management Decisions from Locally-based Monitoring of Protected Areas , 2005, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[38]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Collaborative Research Across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries , 2005 .

[39]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  Support vector machines for predicting distribution of Sudden Oak Death in California , 2005 .

[40]  Jayajit Chakraborty,et al.  Measuring the Digital Divide in the United States: Race, Income, and Personal Computer Ownership , 2005 .

[41]  Douglas Sheil,et al.  Guide to participatory tools for forest communities , 2006 .

[42]  T. Nyerges,et al.  Collaborative Water Resource Decision Support: Results of a Field Experiment , 2006 .

[43]  M. Quinn,et al.  Citizen, science, highways, and wildlife: Using a web-based GIS to engage citizens in collecting wildlife information , 2006 .

[44]  Toshimi Minoura,et al.  WebGRMS: Prototype software for web-based mapping of biological collections , 2007, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[45]  Climate-Host Mapping of Phytophthora ramorum , causal agent of sudden oak death , 2006 .

[46]  Sarah Elwood,et al.  Negotiating Knowledge Production: The Everyday Inclusions, Exclusions, and Contradictions of Participatory GIS Research* , 2006 .

[47]  I. Convery,et al.  Different public health geographies of the 2001 foot and mouth disease epidemic: 'citizen' versus 'professional' epidemiology. , 2006, Health & place.

[48]  Suzana Dragicevic,et al.  Web GIS and Knowledge Management Systems: An Integrated Design for Collaborative Community Planning , 2006 .

[49]  Brett G. Dickson,et al.  Participatory landscape analysis to guide restoration of ponderosa pine ecosystems in the American Southwest , 2006 .

[50]  Brenda Parker Constructing Community Through Maps? Power and Praxis in Community Mapping* , 2006 .

[51]  A. Turner,et al.  Introduction to neogeography , 2006 .

[52]  A. Lawrence ‘No Personal Motive?’ Volunteers, Biodiversity, and the False Dichotomies of Participation , 2006 .

[53]  Suzana Dragicevic,et al.  Collaborative Geographic Information Systems and Science: A Transdisciplinary Evolution , 2006 .

[54]  R. Sieber Public Participation Geographic Information Systems: A Literature Review and Framework , 2006 .

[55]  Christopher C. Miller,et al.  A Beast in the Field: The Google Maps Mashup as GIS/2 , 2006, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[56]  C. Ratti,et al.  Mobile Landscapes: Using Location Data from Cell Phones for Urban Analysis , 2006 .

[57]  C. Findlay,et al.  The Rauischholzhausen Agenda for Road Ecology , 2007 .

[58]  David G. Delaney,et al.  Marine invasive species: validation of citizen science and implications for national monitoring networks , 2007, Biological Invasions.

[59]  R. Bonney,et al.  Citizen Science as a Tool for Conservation in Residential Ecosystems , 2007 .

[60]  David Vieglais,et al.  Sudden oak death: geographic risk estimates and predictions of origins , 2007 .

[61]  Anita Kothari,et al.  Using participatory design to develop (public) health decision support systems through GIS , 2007, International journal of health geographics.

[62]  Brent Pedersen,et al.  Methods for facilitating web-based participatory research informatics , 2007, Ecol. Informatics.

[63]  M. Goodchild Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography , 2007 .

[64]  G. R. Johnson,et al.  Geospatial methods provide timely and comprehensive urban forest information , 2007 .

[65]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  Modeling the risk for a new invasive forest disease in the United States: An evaluation of five environmental niche models , 2007, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[66]  T. Lynam,et al.  A review of tools for incorporating community knowledge, preferences, and values into decision making in natural resources management , 2007 .

[67]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[68]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects , 2007 .

[69]  Susan M. Roberts,et al.  When Participation Meets Empowerment: The WWF and the Politics of Invitation in the Chimalapas, Mexico , 2007 .

[70]  Barry Rowlingson,et al.  Advancing insights into methods for studying environment-health relationships: a multidisciplinary approach to understanding Legionnaires' disease. , 2007, Health & place.

[71]  C. Dunn Participatory GIS — a people's GIS? , 2007 .

[72]  M. Goodchild,et al.  Sharing Geographic Information: An Assessment of the Geospatial One-Stop , 2007 .

[73]  Mor Naaman,et al.  Towards automatic extraction of event and place semantics from flickr tags , 2007, SIGIR.

[74]  Mary Hayden,et al.  The potential for the use of Open Source Software and Open Specifications in creating Web‐based cross‐border health spatial information systems , 2007, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[75]  Cristina Gouveia,et al.  New approaches to environmental monitoring: the use of ICT to explore volunteered geographic information , 2008 .

[76]  MICHAEL F. GOODCHILD,et al.  ASSERTION AND AUTHORITY : THE SCIENCE OF USER-GENERATED GEOGRAPHIC CONTENT , 2008 .

[77]  David L. Tulloch Is VGI participation? From vernal pools to video games , 2008 .

[78]  Jeff Howe,et al.  Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business , 2008, Human Resource Management International Digest.

[79]  M. Goodchild Commentary: whither VGI? , 2008 .

[80]  Christopher J. Seeger,et al.  The role of facilitated volunteered geographic information in the landscape planning and site design process , 2008 .

[81]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  Design Considerations for Collaborative Visual Analytics , 2008, Inf. Vis..

[82]  Claus Rinner,et al.  The use of Web 2.0 concepts to support deliberation in spatial decision-making , 2008, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[83]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  The credibility of volunteered geographic information , 2008 .

[84]  Bertram C. Bruce,et al.  Reconceptualizing the role of the user of spatial data infrastructure , 2008 .

[85]  Sarah Elwood Grassroots groups as stakeholders in spatial data infrastructures: challenges and opportunities for local data development and sharing , 2008, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[86]  H. Levrel,et al.  Enhancing citizen contributions to biodiversity science and public policy , 2008 .

[87]  Maria E. Fernandez-Gimenez,et al.  Adaptive Management and Social Learning in Collaborative and Community-Based Monitoring: a Study of Five Community-Based Forestry Organizations in the western USA , 2008 .

[88]  S. Cook THE CONTRIBUTION REVOLUTION : Letting Volunteers Build Your Business , 2008 .

[89]  Alex Singleton,et al.  Web mapping 2.0: The neogeography of the GeoWeb , 2008 .

[90]  B. Morehouse,et al.  Facilitating Public Involvement in Strategic Planning for Wildland Fire Management , 2008 .

[91]  G. Hertel,et al.  Voluntary Engagement in an Open Web-Based Encyclopedia: Wikipedians and Why They Do It , 2009 .

[92]  Ana Simão,et al.  Web-based Gis for Collaborative Planning and Public Participation: an Application to the Strategic Planning of Wind Farm Sites Keywords: Spatial Planning Collaborative Planning Wind Energy Multi-criteria Spatial Decision Support System (mc-sdss) Argumentation Map Learning Environment World Wide Web , 2022 .

[93]  David M. Aanensen,et al.  EpiCollect: Linking Smartphones to Web Applications for Epidemiology, Ecology and Community Data Collection , 2009, PloS one.

[94]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Mapping the world's photos , 2009, WWW '09.

[95]  Fikret Berkes,et al.  Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[96]  John P. Wilson,et al.  Design and implementation of a web-based platform to support interactive environmental planning , 2009, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[97]  Brian L. Sullivan,et al.  eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences , 2009 .

[98]  Natalie C Ban,et al.  Comparing and Integrating Community‐Based and Science‐Based Approaches to Prioritizing Marine Areas for Protection , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[99]  Matthew Zook,et al.  Placemarks and waterlines: Racialized cyberscapes in post-Katrina Google Earth , 2009 .

[100]  R. W. Carter,et al.  Toward More Reflexive Use of Adaptive Management , 2009 .

[101]  Suzana Dragicevic,et al.  Collaborative GIS for spatial decision support and visualization. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[102]  Dan Watt,et al.  Quality Assessment , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[103]  Erwan Bocher,et al.  An overview on current free and open source desktop GIS developments , 2009, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[104]  David Coleman,et al.  Volunteered Geographic Information: the nature and motivation of produsers , 2009, Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastructures Res..

[105]  Daniel Z. Sui,et al.  From GIS to neogeography: ontological implications and theories of truth , 2010, Ann. GIS.

[106]  Jeremy Morley,et al.  Web 2.0 geotagged photos: Assessing the spatial dimension of the phenomenon , 2010 .

[107]  H. R. Miller,et al.  The Data Avalanche is Here: Shouldn’t We Be Digging? , 2010 .

[108]  Melinda Laituri,et al.  User-friendly web mapping: lessons from a citizen science website , 2010, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[109]  M. Haklay How Good is Volunteered Geographical Information? A Comparative Study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey Datasets , 2010 .

[110]  S. Gorman,et al.  Volunteered Geographic Information and Crowdsourcing Disaster Relief: A Case Study of the Haitian Earthquake , 2010 .

[111]  G. Brent Hall,et al.  Community-based production of geographic information using open source software and Web 2.0 , 2010, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[112]  G. Eysenbach,et al.  Pandemics in the Age of Twitter: Content Analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 Outbreak , 2010, PloS one.

[113]  Guillaume Touya,et al.  Quality Assessment of the French OpenStreetMap Dataset , 2010, Trans. GIS.

[114]  De Groeve Tom,et al.  Citizens as Sensors for Natural Hazards: A VGI integration Workflow , 2010 .

[115]  S. Elwood Geographic information science: emerging research on the societal implications of the geospatial web , 2010 .

[116]  Vyron Antoniou,et al.  How Many Volunteers Does it Take to Map an Area Well? The Validity of Linus’ Law to Volunteered Geographic Information , 2010 .

[117]  Jaeyoung Choi,et al.  Semantic Computing and Privacy: a Case Study Using Inferred Geo-Location , 2011, Int. J. Semantic Comput..