Patient-directed intervention versus clinician reminders alone to improve aspirin use in diabetes: a cluster randomized trial.

BACKGROUND Physician-directed approaches have not eliminated the underuse of effective preventive therapies. METHODS In a cluster-randomized design, 19 physicians caring for 334 eligible patients at least 40 years of age were randomized. All clinicians received computerized reminders at office visits. Intervention physicians received e-mails asking whether aspirin was indicated for each patient. If so, patients received a mailing and nurse telephone call addressing aspirin. The primary outcome was self-reported regular aspirin use. RESULTS Outcome assessment telephone interviews were completed for 242 (72.5%) patients. At follow-up, aspirin use was reported by 60 (46%) of the 130 intervention patients and 44 (39%) of the 112 reminder-only patients, a nonsignificant 7.2% difference (95% confidence interval: -3.9 to 18 percentage points, p = .20). In the subgroup reporting no aspirin use at baseline and no contraindications, 33 (43%) of the 76 intervention and 22 (30%) of the 74 reminder-only patients used aspirin, a 10% difference accounting for clustering (95% CI: 2.2 to 18 percentage points, p = .013). DISCUSSION A patient-directed intervention modestly increased aspirin use among diabetes patients beyond that achieved using computerized clinician reminders for ideal candidates. Obstacles included difficulty contacting patients, real or perceived contraindications, and failure to follow the nurse's advice.

[1]  Sander Greenland,et al.  Model-based estimation of relative risks and other epidemiologic measures in studies of common outcomes and in case-control studies. , 2004, American journal of epidemiology.

[2]  U. P. S. T. Force,et al.  Measuring Quality: Are We Ready To Compare the Quality of Care among Physician Groups? , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  M K Campbell,et al.  Cluster trials in implementation research: estimation of intracluster correlation coefficients and sample size. , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[5]  J. Colwell.  Aspirin Therapy in Diabetes , 1997, Diabetes Care.

[6]  E. Balas,et al.  Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  David M Nathan,et al.  A controlled trial of web-based diabetes disease management: the MGH diabetes primary care improvement project. , 2003, Diabetes care.

[8]  P. Lapuerta,et al.  Physician-related barriers to the effective management of uncontrolled hypertension. , 2002, Archives of internal medicine.

[9]  Alessandro Filippi,et al.  Effects of an automated electronic reminder in changing the antiplatelet drug-prescribing behavior among Italian general practitioners in diabetic patients: an intervention trial. , 2003, Diabetes care.

[10]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerised evidence based guidelines in primary care , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  James F Sallis,et al.  AHA Guidelines for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke: 2002 Update: Consensus Panel Guide to Comprehensive Risk Reduction for Adult Patients Without Coronary or Other Atherosclerotic Vascular Diseases. American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee. , 2002, Circulation.

[12]  William M. Tierney,et al.  Physicians’ reasons for failing to comply with computerized preventive care guidelines , 1996, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[13]  Emily S. Patterson,et al.  Research Paper: Human Factors Barriers to the Effective Use of Ten HIV Clinical Reminders , 2004, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[14]  K Y Liang,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. , 1986, Biometrics.

[15]  M. Hogan,et al.  Aspirin use and counseling about aspirin among patients with diabetes. , 2002, Diabetes care.

[16]  M. Roncaglioni,et al.  Primary prevention of cardiovascular events with low-dose aspirin and vitamin E in type 2 diabetic patients: results of the Primary Prevention Project (PPP) trial. , 2003, Diabetes care.

[17]  R. Dittus,et al.  A randomized trial of a primary care-based disease management program to improve cardiovascular risk factors and glycated hemoglobin levels in patients with diabetes. , 2005, The American journal of medicine.

[18]  Stephen D. Persell,et al.  Aspirin use among adults with diabetes: recent trends and emerging sex disparities. , 2004, Archives of internal medicine.

[19]  E. Balas,et al.  Computerized Knowledge Management in Diabetes Care , 2004, Medical care.

[20]  Julie M. Fiskio,et al.  Technology Evaluation: A Randomized Trial of Electronic Clinical Reminders to Improve Quality of Care for Diabetes and Coronary Artery Disease , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[21]  Emily S. Patterson,et al.  Identifying barriers to the effective use of clinical reminders: Bootstrapping multiple methods , 2005, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[22]  R. Glasgow,et al.  A practical randomized trial to improve diabetes care , 2004, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[23]  David Parkin,et al.  Effect of computerised evidence based guidelines on management of asthma and angina in adults in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 1998, JAMA.

[25]  Emily S. Patterson,et al.  Exploring barriers and facilitators to the use of computerized clinical reminders. , 2005, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[26]  C. McDonald,et al.  Effects of computerized guidelines for managing heart disease in primary care , 2003, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[27]  J. Colwell.  Aspirin therapy in diabetes is underutilized. , 2001, Diabetes care.

[28]  W G Henderson,et al.  Improving residents' compliance with standards of ambulatory care: results from the VA Cooperative Study on Computerized Reminders. , 2000, JAMA.

[29]  M. Rosenthal,et al.  Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice. , 2005, JAMA.

[30]  Bradley N Doebbeling,et al.  Variation in implementation and use of computerized clinical reminders in an integrated healthcare system. , 2004, The American journal of managed care.

[31]  Tom Fahey,et al.  Evaluation of computer based clinical decision support system and risk chart for management of hypertension in primary care: randomised controlled trial , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[32]  S. Asch,et al.  Sins of omission , 2005, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[33]  Donna Spiegelman,et al.  Easy SAS calculations for risk or prevalence ratios and differences. , 2005, American journal of epidemiology.

[34]  W. Assendelft,et al.  Interventions to improve the management of diabetes in primary care, outpatient, and community settings: a systematic review. , 2001, Diabetes care.