Listeners' knowledge of phonological universals: evidence from nasal clusters*

Abstract Optimality Theory explains typological markedness implications by proposing that all speakers possess universal constraints penalising marked structures, irrespective of the evidence provided by their language (Prince & Smolensky 2004). The account of phonological perception sketched here entails that markedness constraints reveal their presence by inducing perceptual ‘repairs’ to structures ungrammatical in the hearer's language. As onset clusters of falling sonority are typologically marked relative to those of rising sonority (Greenberg 1978), we examine English speakers' perception of nasal-initial clusters, which are lacking in English. We find greater accuracy for rising-sonority clusters, evidencing knowledge of markedness constraints favouring such onset clusters. The misperception of sonority falls cannot be accounted for by stimulus artefacts (the materials are perceived accurately by speakers of Russian, a language allowing nasal-initial clusters) nor by phonetic failure (English speakers misperceive falls even with printed materials) nor by putative relations of such onsets to the statistics of the English lexicon.

[1]  F. D. Saussure Cours de linguistique générale , 1924 .

[2]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[3]  T. Bever,et al.  Sensitivity to Phonological Universals in Children and Adolescents. , 1975 .

[4]  J. Hooper An introduction to natural generative phonology , 1976 .

[5]  Edith A. Moravcsik,et al.  Universals of human language , 1978 .

[6]  S. Pinker,et al.  Speakers' sensitivity to rules of frozen word order , 1979 .

[7]  Robert L. Solso,et al.  Positional frequency and versatility of bigrams for two- through nine-letter English words , 1980 .

[8]  John J. McCarthy,et al.  Formal Problems in Semitic Phonology and Morphology , 2018 .

[9]  D. Steriade Greek prosodies and the nature of syllabification , 1982 .

[10]  D. Massaro,et al.  Phonological context in speech perception , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  R. Treiman On the status of final consonant clusters in english syllables , 1984 .

[12]  R. Treiman,et al.  The internal structure of word-initial consonant clusters☆ , 1986 .

[13]  R. Treiman,et al.  Syllabification of intervocalic consonants , 1988 .

[14]  D. Steriade Reduplication and syllable transfer in Sanskrit and elsewhere , 1988, Phonology.

[15]  Bruce F. Pennington,et al.  Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. , 1990, Psychological review.

[16]  A. Healy,et al.  Syllable-internal structure and the sonority hierarchy: Differential evidence from lexical decision, naming, and reading , 1991, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[17]  Daniel Finer,et al.  Parameter setting in second language phonology and syntax , 1991 .

[18]  Dani Byrd Perception of Assimilation in Consonants Clusters:A Gestural Model , 1992 .

[19]  H. Kawasaki-Fukumori,et al.  An Acoustical Basis for Universal Phonotactic Constraints , 1992, Language and speech.

[20]  Heinz J. Giegerich,et al.  English Phonology: An Introduction , 1992 .

[21]  Daniel H.S. Silverman,et al.  Multiple scansions in loanword phonology: evidence from Cantonese , 1992, Phonology.

[22]  R. Treiman,et al.  The Structure of English Syllables and Polysyllables , 1993 .

[23]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  Michael Hammond,et al.  On the status of onglides in , 1995 .

[25]  C. Perfetti,et al.  A rose is a REEZ: The two-cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English , 1995 .

[26]  Michael Hammond,et al.  On the status of onglides in American English , 1995, Phonology.

[27]  Bruce Tesar,et al.  An Iterative Strategy for Learning Metrical Stress in Optimality Theory , 1996 .

[28]  Padraic Monaghan,et al.  Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the cognitive science society , 2001 .

[29]  John J. Ohala,et al.  Alternatives to the sonority hierarchy for explaining segmental sequential constraints , 1997 .

[30]  J. Grainger,et al.  Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: cross-task comparisons. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  U. Frauenfelder,et al.  Processing of illegal consonant clusters : A case of perceptual assimilation ? , 1998 .

[32]  P. Luce,et al.  When Words Compete: Levels of Processing in Perception of Spoken Words , 1998 .

[33]  Bruce Tesar,et al.  Robust Interpretive Parsing in Metrical Stress Theory , 1998 .

[34]  M. Pitt,et al.  Phonological processes and the perception of phonotactically illegal consonant clusters , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al.  The processing of illegal consonant clusters: A case of perceptual assimilation? , 1998 .

[36]  Bruce Tesar,et al.  An iterative strategy for language learning , 1998 .

[37]  Ellen Broselow,et al.  THE EMERGENCE OF THE UNMARKED IN SECOND LANGUAGE PHONOLOGY , 1998, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[38]  A M Surprenant,et al.  The perception of speech gestures. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  C. Romani,et al.  Syllabic Constraints in the Phonological Errors of an Aphasic Patient , 1998, Brain and Language.

[40]  J. Gierut Syllable onsets: clusters and adjuncts in acquisition. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[41]  P. Luce,et al.  Probabilistic Phonotactics and Neighborhood Activation in Spoken Word Recognition , 1999 .

[42]  Frida Morelli,et al.  The Phonotactics and Phonology of Obstruent Clusters in Optimality Theory , 1999 .

[43]  J. Mehler,et al.  Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion? , 1999, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[44]  Lisa Davidson Experimentally Uncovering Hidden Strata in English Phonology , 2000 .

[45]  K. Crosswhite,et al.  Vowel Reduction in Optimality Theory , 2001 .

[46]  J. Mehler,et al.  New evidence for prelexical phonological processing in word recognition , 2001 .

[47]  J. Barlow The structure of /s/-sequences: evidence from a disordered system , 2001, Journal of Child Language.

[48]  Carole Paradis,et al.  Addressing and disconfirming some predictions of phonetic approximation for loanword adaptation , 2002 .

[49]  A. Alonzo,et al.  Sonority Constraints on Onset–Rime Cohesion: Evidence from Native and Bilingual Filipino Readers of English , 2002, Brain and Language.

[50]  Stephen G Parker,et al.  Quantifying the sonority hierarchy , 2002 .

[51]  E. Moreton Structural constraints in the perception of English stop-sonorant clusters , 2002, Cognition.

[52]  Maria Gouskova,et al.  Falling sonority onsets, loanwords, and Syllable Contact , 2002 .

[53]  R. Treiman,et al.  Segmentation of spoken words into syllables by English-speaking children as compared to adults. , 2002, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[54]  Frances Conlin,et al.  Proceedings of the 27th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development , 2003 .

[55]  Sharon Peperkamp,et al.  Reinterpreting loanword adaptations: the role of perception , 2003 .

[56]  Zheng Xu,et al.  DIFFERENTIAL DIFFICULTY IN THE ACQUISITION OF SECOND LANGUAGE PHONOLOGY , 2004 .

[57]  Maria Gouskova,et al.  Relational hierarchies in Optimality Theory: the case of syllable contact , 2004, Phonology.

[58]  R. Wright Phonetically Based Phonology: A review of perceptual cues and cue robustness , 2004 .

[59]  Michael S Vitevitch,et al.  A Web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[60]  Joe Pater,et al.  Bridging the Gap Between Receptive and Productive Development with Minimally Violable Constraints , 2004 .

[61]  Paul John Thibault,et al.  Saussure, Ferdinand de , 2004 .

[62]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[63]  Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.  The Self-Organization of Speech Sounds , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[64]  Adam Buchwald Representing Sound Structure: Evidence from Aphasia , 2005 .

[65]  J. Barlow Sonority Effects in the Production of Consonant Clusters by Spanish-Speaking Children , 2005 .

[66]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Syllable structure and sonority in language inventory and aphasic neologisms , 2005, Brain and Language.

[67]  David Bamman,et al.  Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development , 2006 .

[68]  Lisa Davidson,et al.  Phonotactics and Articulatory Coordination Interact in Phonology: Evidence from Nonnative Production , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[69]  Moira Yip,et al.  The symbiosis between perception and grammar in loanword phonology , 2006 .

[70]  S. Peperkamp Do we have innate knowledge about phonological markedness? Comments on Berent, Steriade, Lennertz, and Vaknin , 2007, Cognition.

[71]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Some listener-oriented accounts of h-aspiré in French , 2007 .

[72]  Adam Albright,et al.  Natural classes are not enough: Biased generalization in novel onset clusters , 2007 .

[73]  P. Lacy The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology: The interaction of tone, sonority, and prosodic structure , 2007 .

[74]  D. Steriade,et al.  What we know about what we have never heard: Evidence from perceptual illusions , 2007, Cognition.

[75]  Bruce Hayes,et al.  A Maximum Entropy Model of Phonotactics and Phonotactic Learning , 2008, Linguistic Inquiry.

[76]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[77]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Language universals in human brains , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[78]  Robert Kirchner,et al.  Phonetically Based Phonology , 2008 .

[79]  Sharon Peperkamp,et al.  On the perceptual origin of loanword adaptations: experimental evidence from Japanese* , 2008, Phonology.

[80]  J. Goldsmith The Syllable , 2009 .

[81]  Phonology in perception , 2009 .

[82]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Loanword adaptation as first-language phonological perception , 2009 .

[83]  Joe Pater The harmonic mind : from neural computation to optimality-theoretic grammar , 2009 .

[84]  Wim Zonneveld,et al.  Constraints in Phonological Acquisition , 2009 .

[85]  I. Berent,et al.  Universal constraints on the sound structure of language: phonological or acoustic? , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.