The DEEP Groth Strip Galaxy Redshift Survey. III. Redshift Catalog and Properties of Galaxies

The Deep Extragalactic Evolutionary Probe (DEEP) is a series of spectroscopic surveys of faint galaxies, targeted at understanding the properties and clustering of galaxies at redshifts z ~ 1. We present the redshift catalog of the DEEP1 Groth Strip pilot phase of this project, a Keck LRIS survey of faint galaxies in the Groth Survey Strip imaged with HST WFPC2. The redshift catalog and data, including reduced spectra, are made publicly available through a Web-accessible database. The catalog contains 658 secure galaxy redshifts with a median z = 0.65. The distribution of these galaxies shows large-scale structure walls to z ~ 1. We find a bimodal distribution in the galaxy color-magnitude diagram that persists to the same distance. A similar color division has been seen locally by the SDSS and to z ~ 1 by the COMBO-17 survey. The HST imaging allows us to measure structural properties of the galaxies, and we find that the color division corresponds generally to a structural division. Most red galaxies, ~75%, are centrally concentrated, with a red bulge or spheroidal stellar component, while blue galaxies usually have exponential profiles. However, there are two subclasses of red galaxies that are not bulge dominated: edge-on disks and a second category that we term diffuse red galaxies (DIFRGs). Comparison to a local sample drawn from the RC3 suggests that distant edge-on disks are similar in appearance and frequency to those at low redshift, but analogs of DIFRGs are rare among local red galaxies. DIFRGs have significant emission lines, indicating that they are reddened mainly by dust rather than age. The DIFRGs in our sample are all at z > 0.64, suggesting that DIFRGs are more prevalent at high redshifts; they may be related to the dusty or irregular extremely red objects beyond z > 1.2 that have been found in deep K-selected surveys. We measure the color evolution of both red and blue galaxies by comparing our U - B colors to those from the RC3. For red galaxies, we find a reddening of only 0.11 mag from z ~ 0.8 to now, about half the color evolution measured by COMBO-17. Larger, more carefully defined samples with better colors are needed to improve this measurement. Reconciling evolution in color, luminosity, mass, morphology, and star formation rates will be an active topic of future research.

[1]  P. P. van der Werf,et al.  Stellar Populations and Kinematics of Red Galaxies at z > 2: Implications for the Formation of Massive Galaxies , 2004, astro-ph/0404471.

[2]  Patrick J. McCarthy,et al.  The Gemini Deep Deep Survey: I. Introduction to the Survey, Catalogs and Composite Spectra , 2004, astro-ph/0402436.

[3]  H. Rix,et al.  GEMS: Galaxy Evolution from Morphologies and SEDs , 2004, astro-ph/0401427.

[4]  M. Pettini,et al.  A Survey of Star-forming Galaxies in the 1.4 ≲ z ≲ 2.5 Redshift Desert: Overview , 2004, astro-ph/0401439.

[5]  Stefano Casertano,et al.  Morphologies and Spectral Energy Distributions of Extremely Red Galaxies in the GOODS-South Field , 2003, astro-ph/0309187.

[6]  J. Binney.  On the origin of the galaxy luminosity function , 2003, astro-ph/0308172.

[7]  G. Granato,et al.  A Physical Model for the Coevolution of QSOs and Their Spheroidal Hosts , 2003, astro-ph/0307202.

[8]  Heidelberg,et al.  Nearly 5000 Distant Early-Type Galaxies in COMBO-17: A Red Sequence and Its Evolution since z ~ 1 , 2003, astro-ph/0303394.

[9]  A. Cimatti,et al.  The manifold spectra and morphologies of EROs , 2003, astro-ph/0310742.

[10]  N. Vogt,et al.  The DEEP Groth Strip Survey. IX. Evolution of the Fundamental Plane of Field Galaxies , 2003, astro-ph/0307242.

[11]  Puragra Guhathakurta,et al.  The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: Spectral Classification of Galaxies at z ∼ 1 , 2003, astro-ph/0305587.

[12]  D. Madgwick,et al.  The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: Clustering of Galaxies in Early Data , 2003, astro-ph/0305586.

[13]  Bhasker K. Moorthy,et al.  The First Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2003, astro-ph/0305492.

[14]  E. Bell,et al.  The Optical and Near-Infrared Properties of Galaxies. I. Luminosity and Stellar Mass Functions , 2003, astro-ph/0302543.

[15]  Durham,et al.  What Shapes the Luminosity Function of Galaxies? , 2003, astro-ph/0302450.

[16]  D. York,et al.  The Overdensities of Galaxy Environments as a Function of Luminosity and Color , 2002, astro-ph/0212085.

[17]  Oxford,et al.  The COMBO-17 survey: Evolution of the galaxy luminosity function from 25,000 galaxies with 0.2 < z < 1.2 , 2002, astro-ph/0208345.

[18]  R. Nichol,et al.  The dependence of star formation history and internal structure on stellar mass for 105 low‐redshift galaxies , 2002, astro-ph/0205070.

[19]  Lin Yan,et al.  Hubble Space Telescope WFPC2 Morphologies of K-selected Extremely Red Galaxies , 2002, astro-ph/0212153.

[20]  R. Nichol,et al.  The Galaxy Luminosity Function and Luminosity Density at Redshift z = 0.1 , 2002, astro-ph/0210215.

[21]  Alexander S. Szalay,et al.  Galaxy Clustering in Early Sloan Digital Sky Survey Redshift Data , 2002 .

[22]  N. Vogt,et al.  The DEEP Groth Strip Survey. II. Hubble Space Telescope Structural Parameters of Galaxies in the Groth Strip , 2002, astro-ph/0205025.

[23]  D. Madgwick,et al.  The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: galaxy luminosity functions per spectral type , 2001, astro-ph/0107197.

[24]  A. Cimatti,et al.  The K20 survey - I. Disentangling old and dusty star-forming galaxies in the ERO population , 2001, astro-ph/0111527.

[25]  R. Abraham,et al.  The Morphological Evolution of Galaxies , 2001, Science.

[26]  V. Narayanan,et al.  Color Separation of Galaxy Types in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Imaging Data , 2001, astro-ph/0107201.

[27]  S.Cole,et al.  The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: spectra and redshifts , 2001, astro-ph/0106498.

[28]  et al,et al.  Galaxy Clustering in Early SDSS Redshift Data , 2001, astro-ph/0106476.

[29]  M. Gregg,et al.  Ultracompact Dwarf Galaxies in the Fornax Cluster , 2001, astro-ph/0106377.

[30]  P. Hall,et al.  The Galaxy Correlation Function in the CNOC2 Redshift Survey: Dependence on Color, Luminosity, and Redshift , 2001, astro-ph/0106250.

[31]  M. Pahre,et al.  Caltech Faint Galaxy Redshift Survey. VIII. Analysis of the Field J0053+1234 , 1998, astro-ph/9809067.

[32]  Walter A. Siegmund,et al.  The Luminosity Function of Galaxies in SDSS Commissioning Data , 2000, astro-ph/0012085.

[33]  A. Connolly,et al.  Star Formation in Galaxies between Redshifts of 0.7 and 1.8 , 2000 .

[34]  N. Vogt,et al.  The DEEP Groth Strip Survey. X. Number Density and Luminosity Function of Field E/S0 Galaxies at z < 1 , 2000, astro-ph/0011092.

[35]  D. Hogg,et al.  Caltech Faint Galaxy Redshift Survey. XIV. Galaxy Morphology in the Hubble Deep Field (North) and Its Flanking Fields to z = 1.2 , 2000, astro-ph/0008051.

[36]  D. Fabricant,et al.  Hubble Space Telescope Photometry and Keck Spectroscopy of the Rich Cluster MS 1054–03: Morphologies, Butcher-Oemler Effect, and the Color-Magnitude Relation at z = 0.83 , 2000, astro-ph/0002507.

[37]  D. Hogg,et al.  Caltech Faint Galaxy Redshift Survey. X. A Redshift Survey in the Region of the Hubble Deep Field North , 1999, astro-ph/9912048.

[38]  J. Rhodes,et al.  Weak Lensing Measurements: A Revisited Method and Application toHubble Space Telescope Images , 1999, astro-ph/9905090.

[39]  Huan Lin,et al.  The CNOC2 Field Galaxy Luminosity Function. I. A Description of Luminosity Function Evolution , 1999, astro-ph/9902249.

[40]  N. Vogt,et al.  The Magnitude-Size Relation of Galaxies out to z ∼ 1 , 1999, astro-ph/9902147.

[41]  W. Sargent,et al.  Galaxy Clustering and Large-Scale Structure from z = 0.2 to z = 0.5 in Two Norris Redshift Surveys , 1999, astro-ph/9901194.

[42]  K. I. O. Astronomy,et al.  The star formation history of the Hubble sequence: spatially resolved colour distributions of intermediate-redshift galaxies in the Hubble Deep Field , 1998, astro-ph/9807140.

[43]  D. Schlegel,et al.  Maps of Dust Infrared Emission for Use in Estimation of Reddening and Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Foregrounds , 1998 .

[44]  Karl Glazebrook,et al.  Hubble Space Telescope Imaging of the CFRS and LDSS Redshift Surveys. I. Morphological Properties , 1998 .

[45]  M. Bershady,et al.  Optical Structure and Colors of Faint Compact Narrow Emission Line Galaxies , 1998 .

[46]  J. Brinchmann,et al.  HST imaging of CFRS and LDSS galaxies - I: Morphological Properties , 1997, astro-ph/9712060.

[47]  N. Vogt,et al.  The Nature of Compact Galaxies in the Hubble Deep Field. I. Global Properties , 1997 .

[48]  D. Schlegel,et al.  Maps of Dust IR Emission for Use in Estimation of Reddening and CMBR Foregrounds , 1997, astro-ph/9710327.

[49]  S. Shectman,et al.  LARGE-SCALE STRUCTURE IN THE LAS CAMPANAS REDSHIFT SURVEY , 1996 .

[50]  D. Hogg,et al.  Redshift Clustering in the Hubble Deep Field , 1996, astro-ph/9608121.

[51]  A. Kinney,et al.  Template ultraviolet to near-infrared spectra of star-forming galaxies and their application to K-corrections , 1996 .

[52]  O. Fèvre,et al.  The Canada France Redshift Survey VIII: Evolution of the clustering of galaxies from z~1 , 1995, astro-ph/9510090.

[53]  Takashi Ichikawa,et al.  GALAXY COLORS IN VARIOUS PHOTOMETRIC BAND SYSTEMS , 1995 .

[54]  R. Kron,et al.  Photoelectric Photometry of Zwicky Galaxies , 1995 .

[55]  O. Fèvre,et al.  The Canada-France Redshift Survey. VI. Evolution of the Galaxy Luminosity Function to Z approximately 1 , 1995, astro-ph/9507079.

[56]  O. Fèvre,et al.  The Canada-France Redshift Survey. V. Global Properties of the Sample , 1995, astro-ph/9507014.

[57]  O. Fèvre,et al.  The Canada-France Redshift Survey. III. ``Single Emission-Line'' Objects, Analysis of Repeat Observations, and Spectroscopic Identifications in the 1415+52 and 2215+00 Fields , 1995, astro-ph/9507012.

[58]  D. Kelson,et al.  The Evolution of Early-Type Galaxies in Distant Clusters. II. Internal Kinematics of 55 Galaxies in the z=0.33 Cluster Cl 1358+62 , 1995, astro-ph/9908257.

[59]  Harland W. Epps,et al.  THE KECK LOW-RESOLUTION IMAGING SPECTROMETER , 1995 .

[60]  Michael J. Kurtz,et al.  A Medium-deep Redshift Survey of a Minislice at the North Galactic Pole. II. The Data: Erratum , 1994 .

[61]  Francisco Valdes,et al.  The Morphologies of Distant Galaxies. I. an Automated Classification System , 1994 .

[62]  A. Kinney,et al.  Dust extinction of the stellar continua in starburst galaxies: The Ultraviolet and optical extinction law , 1994 .

[63]  O. Fèvre,et al.  A Large Structure of Galaxies at a Redshift Z = 0.985 , 1994 .

[64]  G. Gilmore,et al.  The distribution of low-mass stars in the Galactic disc , 1993 .

[65]  Patrick Seitzer,et al.  Correlations between UBV colors and fine structure in E and S0 galaxies: A First attempt at dating ancient merger events , 1992 .

[66]  R. Ellis,et al.  Precision photometry of early-type galaxies in the Coma and Virgo clusters: a test of the universality of the colour–magnitude relation – II. Analysis , 1992 .

[67]  T. Beers,et al.  Measures of location and scale for velocities in clusters of galaxies. A robust approach , 1990 .

[68]  A. S. Szalay,et al.  Large-scale distribution of galaxies at the Galactic poles , 1990, Nature.

[69]  D. Weedman,et al.  Colors and magnitudes predicted for high redshift galaxies , 1980 .