Model Risk in Copula Based Default Pricing Models

This project identifies and quantifies two potential sources of model risk in the valuation of basket credit derivatives. The framework employed is that of a latent variable model with factor structure which enjoys a great popularity in the financial industry as well as in academia. Preliminary results indicate the prime importance of specifying the factor dependence structure beyond just estimating linear correlations for a Gaussian copula. Model risk is found to be substantial due to two reasons. Firstly, it is well known that the distribution functions of risk factors have lower tail-dependence. Derivatives prices are computed for models that are consistent with this fact. Their prices are shown to differ considerably, relative to the standard Gaussian model, for some products and dramatically for others. Secondly, the lack of convergence (even for very large numbers of simulation runs) for certain estimates that are functions of low probability events is another source of model risk. An efficient route to the solution of this second kind of model risk is the use of variance reduction techniques. Methods for variance reduction in copula based simulations are introduced and their efficiency is demonstrated. Moreover closed form solutions for the last-to default within a given portfolio are derived and worst case model risk which is often impossible to obtain by Monte Carlo simulation is calculated by means of these closed forms. ∗Financial support by the National Centre of Competence in Research ”Financial Valuation and Risk Management” (NCCR FINRISK) is acknowledged. NCCR FINRISK is a research programme of the Swiss National Science Foundation.

[1]  Bill Ravens,et al.  An Introduction to Copulas , 2000, Technometrics.

[2]  Philipp J. Schönbucher,et al.  Term structure modelling of defaultable bonds , 1998 .

[3]  D. Siegmund Importance Sampling in the Monte Carlo Study of Sequential Tests , 1976 .

[4]  R. Jarrow,et al.  Pricing Derivatives on Financial Securities Subject to Credit Risk , 1995 .

[5]  Ing Rj Ser Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics , 1980 .

[6]  Gurdip Bakshi,et al.  Understanding the Role of Recovery in Default Risk Models: Empirical Comparisons and Implied Recovery Rates , 2006 .

[7]  L. Devroye Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation , 1986 .

[8]  Richard M Cantor,et al.  Testing for Rating Consistency in Annual Default Rates , 2001 .

[9]  D. Madan,et al.  Pricing the risks of default , 1998 .

[10]  Stephen Kealhofer,et al.  Uses and Abuses of Bond Default Rates , 2000 .

[11]  Stephen D. Roberts,et al.  A time-varying Poisson arrival process generator , 1984 .

[12]  Paul Glasserman,et al.  Efficient Monte Carlo methods for value-at-risk , 2001 .

[13]  Modelling Dependence for Credit Derivatives with Copulas , 2001 .

[14]  Philipp J. Sch Onbucher Factor models for portfolio credit risk , 2000 .

[15]  S. Asmussen,et al.  Simulation of Ruin Probabilities for Subexponential Claims , 1997, ASTIN Bulletin.

[16]  Mark H. A. Davis,et al.  Modelling default correlation in bond portfolios , 1999 .

[17]  Paul Glasserman,et al.  1 Importance Sampling and Stratification for Value-at-Risk , 1999 .

[18]  Klemens Sebastian Binswanger Rare events and insurance , 1997 .

[19]  Philip Heidelberger,et al.  Fast simulation of rare events in queueing and reliability models , 1993, TOMC.

[20]  Paul Glasserman,et al.  Variance reduction techniques for value-at-risk with heavy-tailed risk factors , 2000, 2000 Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37165).

[21]  HeidelbergerPhilip Fast simulation of rare events in queueing and reliability models , 1995 .

[22]  P. Schönbucher,et al.  Copula-Dependent Defaults in Intensity Models , 2001 .

[23]  M. Davis,et al.  Infectious defaults , 2001 .

[24]  Abe Sklar,et al.  Random variables, joint distribution functions, and copulas , 1973, Kybernetika.

[25]  H. Joe Multivariate models and dependence concepts , 1998 .

[26]  David C. Hoaglin,et al.  The Reporting of Computation-Based Results in Statistics , 1975 .

[27]  D. Duffie,et al.  Term Structures of Credit Spreads with Incomplete Accounting Information , 2001, World Scientific Reference on Contingent Claims Analysis in Corporate Finance.

[28]  Brian D. Ripley,et al.  Stochastic Simulation , 2005 .

[29]  K. Singleton,et al.  Simulating Correlated Defaults , 1999 .

[30]  Frank C. Kaminsky,et al.  Simulating nonstationary Poisson processes: a comparison of alternatives including the correct approach , 1977 .

[31]  Paul Glasserman,et al.  Portfolio Value‐at‐Risk with Heavy‐Tailed Risk Factors , 2002 .

[32]  M. Crouhy,et al.  Evaluating Credit Risk: An Option Pricing Approach , 1999 .

[33]  Intensity-Based Valuation of Basket Credit Derivatives , 2001 .

[34]  Roger M. Stein,et al.  LossCalc TM : Moody's Model for Predicting Loss Given Default (LGD) , 2002 .

[35]  D. Duffie,et al.  Modeling term structures of defaultable bonds , 1999 .

[36]  R. C. Merton,et al.  On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates , 1974, World Scientific Reference on Contingent Claims Analysis in Corporate Finance.

[37]  David X. Li On Default Correlation: A Copula Function Approach , 1999 .

[38]  Alexander J. McNeil,et al.  Modelling dependent defaults , 2001 .

[39]  M. Guzmán Moody ’ s Model for Predicting Loss Given Default ( LGD ) , 2002 .

[40]  P. Embrechts,et al.  Risk Management: Correlation and Dependence in Risk Management: Properties and Pitfalls , 2002 .