Ubiquitous Love or Not? Animal Welfare and Animal-Informed Consent in Giant Panda Tourism

Simple Summary Understanding the relationship that tourists have with the giant panda can be taken-for-granted given this species’ iconic status and cuteness. Based on a self-reporting questionnaire, we found that Chinese “fans” of giant pandas generally paid greater attention to the welfare of the captive pandas in comparison to “non-fans”. Additionally, fans tend to perceive the welfare of captive pandas more positively, who tend to believe that giant pandas offer more prominent consent to being used as tourist attractions. This study provides new insight into an understanding of the human–panda connection. The ubiquitous love we have for pandas can translate into a better life for these animals down the road. Abstract Scholars argue that the ubiquity of the “virtual panda”—the panda people meet in zoos and consume as souvenirs, online memes, or videos—exists in a state of hybridity between wild and domesticated. The species has garnered a significant amount of attention because of their iconic status and because of how cute they are to an adoring crowd. However, given the degree of regard tourists have for the panda, there is a dearth of research on different types of visitors to captive panda venues. In filling this gap, we investigated (1) how deeply Chinese “fans” and “non-fans” consider the welfare of captive giant pandas, and (2) if these groups differ in their assessment of whether giant pandas consent to being used as tourist attractions. In both aims, we apply a recent model on animal welfare and animal consent to giant pandas of the Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding.

[1]  Marina Dias Neto Milestones of 2022. , 2023, Portuguese journal of cardiac thoracic and vascular surgery.

[2]  Gareth Davey Animal Welfare in China: Culture, Politics and Crisis , 2022, Anthrozoös.

[3]  Peter J. Li Animal Welfare in China , 2021, Journal of Animal Ethics.

[4]  D. Fennell Animal-informed consent: sled dog tours as asymmetric agential events , 2022, Tourism Management.

[5]  M. Mendl,et al.  Thinking outside the lab: can studies of pet rats inform pet and laboratory rat welfare? , 2021, Applied Animal Behaviour Science.

[6]  J. Dawson,et al.  Last chance tourism: a decade review of a case study on Churchill, Manitoba’s polar bear viewing industry , 2021, Journal of Sustainable Tourism.

[7]  Rio Katayama Idols, celebrities, and fans at the time of post-catastrophe , 2021 .

[8]  Xingyang Lv,et al.  Does a cute artificial intelligence assistant soften the blow? The impact of cuteness on customer tolerance of assistant service failure , 2021 .

[9]  Exploring non-human work in tourism , 2021 .

[10]  Yulei Guo 13 “Cute, but get up and work!”: The biophilia hypothesis in tourists’ linguistic interactions with pandas , 2021, Exploring non-human work in tourism.

[11]  Jill Bueddefeld,et al.  12 The greening of polar bears: Lively commodities in a climate change economy , 2021, Exploring non-human work in tourism.

[12]  José-Carlos García-Rosell,et al.  7 Animals as tourism stakeholders: Huskies, reindeer, and horses working in Lapland , 2021, Exploring non-human work in tourism.

[13]  V. Penteriani,et al.  Does artificial feeding affect large carnivore behaviours? The case study of brown bears in a hunted and tourist exploited subpopulation , 2021, Biological Conservation.

[14]  Nadia Hanin Nazlan,et al.  “A cute surprise”: Examining the influence of meeting giveaways on word-of-mouth intention , 2020 .

[15]  Hoffer Lee,et al.  Selling cute destinations to East Asia , 2020 .

[16]  D. Mellor,et al.  The 2020 Five Domains Model: Including Human–Animal Interactions in Assessments of Animal Welfare , 2020, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[17]  Caroline Winter A review of research into animal ethics in tourism: Launching the annals of tourism research curated collection on animal ethics in tourism , 2020 .

[18]  Hilde Nikoline Hambro Dybsand In the absence of a main attraction – Perspectives from polar bear watching tourism participants , 2020 .

[19]  Qinghua Shi,et al.  Sustainable Development of Rural Household Economy , 2020 .

[20]  D. Fennell,et al.  Tourism, animals and the scales of justice , 2020, Journal of Sustainable Tourism.

[21]  M. Dinis,et al.  Comparing Psychopathological Symptoms in Portuguese Football Fans and Non-fans , 2020, Behavioral sciences.

[22]  Tien-Tien Liao,et al.  An exploration of celebrity business ventures and their appeal to fans and non-fans , 2020 .

[23]  M. Songer,et al.  Giant Panda National Park, a step towards streamlining protected areas and cohesive conservation management in China , 2020 .

[24]  Y. Li,et al.  Gut microbiota in reintroduction of giant panda , 2020, Ecology and evolution.

[25]  M. Barua,et al.  Affective economies, pandas, and the atmospheric politics of lively capital , 2020 .

[26]  M. Äijälä Knowing through interspecies relationality in tourism? Animal agency in human-sled dog encounters , 2019, Matkailututkimus.

[27]  Sarah Kenehan The Moral Status of Animal Research Subjects in Industry: A Stakeholder Analysis , 2019, Animal Experimentation: Working Towards a Paradigm Change.

[28]  K. Jayne,et al.  Animal Experimentation: Working Towards a Paradigm Change , 2019 .

[29]  Joerg Koenigstorfer,et al.  Components and Outcomes of Fan Engagement in Team Sports: The Perspective of Managers and Fans , 2019, Journal of Global Sport Management.

[30]  W. Thompson,et al.  Implicit violent imagery processing among fans and non-fans of music with violent themes , 2019, Royal Society Open Science.

[31]  J. Serpell How happy is your pet? The Problem of subjectivity in the assessment of companion animal welfare , 2019, Animal Welfare.

[32]  N. D'cruze,et al.  The Impact of ‘Selfie’ Tourism on the Behaviour and Welfare of Brown-Throated Three-Toed Sloths , 2018, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[33]  Judith Shapiro Panda Nation: The Construction and Conservation of China’s Modern Icon. By E. Elena Songster , 2018, Environmental History.

[34]  Xiaoguang Zheng,et al.  The Value of Ecosystem Services from Giant Panda Reserves , 2018, Current Biology.

[35]  D. Broom Tourism and Animal Welfare , 2018 .

[36]  H. Mair,et al.  The Gendered Natures of Polar Bear Tourism , 2018 .

[37]  Yi Yang,et al.  Reintroduction of the giant panda into the wild: A good start suggests a bright future , 2018 .

[38]  F. Wei,et al.  Panda Downlisted but not Out of the Woods , 2018 .

[39]  Ana Catarina Vieira de Castro,et al.  Do aversive-based training methods actually compromise dog welfare?: A literature review , 2017 .

[40]  Kyong Yoon Korean Wave| Cultural Translation of K-Pop Among Asian Canadian Fans , 2017 .

[41]  K. Jerina,et al.  Consequences of brown bear viewing tourism : A review , 2017 .

[42]  Allison Page “This Baby Sloth Will Inspire You to Keep Going”: Capital, Labor, and the Affective Power of Cute Animal Videos , 2016 .

[43]  Florian Probst,et al.  More fans at any cost? Analysing the economic effects of the ratio of fans to non-fans in a customer portfolio considering electronic word of mouth , 2016, J. Decis. Syst..

[44]  O. Yudina,et al.  Situating the wildlife spectacle: ecofeminism, representation, and polar bear tourism , 2016 .

[45]  Yibo Hu,et al.  Progress in the ecology and conservation of giant pandas , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[46]  P. Cavalieri The Meaning of the Great Ape Project , 2015 .

[47]  Sharon E. Roberts,et al.  A Social Identity Perspective of Personality Differences between Fan and Non-Fan Identities , 2015 .

[48]  Matthew Hills,et al.  The expertise of digital fandom as a ‘community of practice’ , 2015 .

[49]  B. Lee Cooper,et al.  Understanding Fandom: An Introduction to the Study of Media Fan Culture , 2015 .

[50]  C. Dussault,et al.  How artificial feeding for tourism‐watching modifies black bear space use and habitat selection , 2014 .

[51]  J. Blewitt What’s new pussycat? A genealogy of animal celebrity , 2013 .

[52]  M. Duffett Understanding Fandom , 2013 .

[53]  I. Kojola,et al.  Problem brown bears Ursus arctos in Finland in relation to bear feeding for tourism purposes and the density of bears and humans , 2012 .

[54]  Patrick W. Galbraith,et al.  Idols and Celebrity in Japanese Media Culture , 2012 .

[55]  Jason G. Karlin Through a Looking Glass Darkly: Television Advertising, Idols, and the Making of Fan Audiences , 2012 .

[56]  S. Moore,et al.  Should dingoes die? Principles for engaging ecocentric ethics in wildlife tourism management , 2011 .

[57]  J. Dobson Towards a utilitarian ethic for marine wildlife tourism , 2011 .

[58]  Christopher A. Medjesky Show Sold Separately: Promos, Spoilers, and Other Media Paratexts , 2011 .

[59]  R. Duffy,et al.  Global regulations and local practices: the politics and governance of animal welfare in elephant tourism , 2011 .

[60]  J. Gray,et al.  Fan Cultures and Fan Communities , 2011 .

[61]  Jonathan Gray,et al.  Show Sold Separately: Promos, Spoilers, and Other Media Paratexts , 2010 .

[62]  M. Campbell,et al.  Public Attitudes toward Black Bears (Ursus americanus) and Cougars (Puma concolor) on Vancouver Island , 2010 .

[63]  Manuela Michelazzi,et al.  Companion animal welfare and possible implications on the human–pet relationship , 2009 .

[64]  Charlotte C. Burn,et al.  What is it like to be a rat? Rat sensory perception and its implications for experimental design and rat welfare , 2008 .

[65]  Erica Rosenfeld Halverson,et al.  Fantasy Baseball , 2008, Games Cult..

[66]  B. Lovelock An introduction to consumptive wildlife tourism , 2007 .

[67]  B. Lovelock Tourism and the consumption of wildlife : hunting, shooting and sport fishing , 2007 .

[68]  C. Diederich,et al.  The quality of the relation between handler and military dogs influences efficiency and welfare of dogs , 2007 .

[69]  P. Sillanpää The Scandinavian Sporting Tour 1830-1914 , 2007 .

[70]  R. Lemelin The Gawk, The Glance, and The Gaze: Ocular Consumption and Polar Bear Tourism in Churchill, Manitoba, Canada , 2006 .

[71]  C. Sandvoss Fans: The Mirror of Consumption , 2005 .

[72]  C. Cheung,et al.  Identity Achievement and Idol Worship among Teenagers in Hong Kong , 2003 .

[73]  M. Bloomsmith,et al.  Post‐occupancy evaluation of zoo Atlanta's Giant Panda Conservation Center: Staff and visitor reactions , 2003 .

[74]  J. Diamond,et al.  Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal domestication , 2002, Nature.

[75]  W. Brooker Using the Force: Creativity, Community and Star Wars Fans , 2002 .

[76]  C. Sanders,et al.  The Impact of Guide Dogs on the Identity of People with Visual Impairments , 2000 .

[77]  R. Freeman,et al.  A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation , 1998 .

[78]  G. Schaller The Last Panda , 1993 .

[79]  J. Kennedy The new anthropomorphism , 1992 .