Accurate, fully-automated registration of coronary arteries for volumetric CT digital subtraction angiography

Diagnosis of coronary artery disease with Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) is complicated by the presence of signi cant calci cation or stents. Volumetric CT Digital Subtraction Angiography (CTDSA) has recently been shown to be e ective at overcoming these limitations. Precise registration of structures is essential as any misalignment can produce artifacts potentially inhibiting clinical interpretation of the data. The fully-automated registration method described in this paper addresses the problem by combining a dense deformation eld with rigid-body transformations where calci cations/stents are present. The method contains non-rigid and rigid components. Non-rigid registration recovers the majority of motion artifacts and produces a dense deformation eld valid over the entire scan domain. Discrete domains are identi ed in which rigid registrations very accurately align each calci cation/stent. These rigid-body transformations are combined within the immediate area of the deformation eld using a distance transform to minimize distortion of the surrounding tissue. A recent interim analysis of a clinical feasibility study evaluated reader con dence and diagnostic accuracy in conventional CCTA and CTDSA registered using this method. Conventional invasive coronary angiography was used as the reference. The study included 27 patients scanned with a second-generation 320-row CT detector in which 41 lesions were identi ed. Compared to conventional CCTA, CTDSA improved reader con dence in 13/36 (36%) of segments with severe calci cation and 3/5 (60%) of segments with coronary stents. Also, the false positive rate of CTDSA was reduced compared to conventional CCTA from 18% (24/130) to 14% (19/130).

[1]  M. Budoff,et al.  Influence of coronary calcification on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2012, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[2]  Tom Duff,et al.  Matrix animation and polar decomposition , 1992 .

[3]  N. Paul,et al.  Perioperative β-Blockers : Use With Caution Perioperative β Blockers in Patients Having Non-Cardiac Surgery : A Meta-Analysis , 2010 .

[4]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Nonrigid registration for subtraction CT angiography applied to the carotids and cranial arteries. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[5]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Reduction of motion artifacts in three-dimensional CT-DSA using constrained adaptive multilevel free-form registration , 2001, CARS.

[6]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Information Theoretic Similarity Measures in Non-rigid Registration , 2003, IPMI.

[7]  Marco Razeto,et al.  Accurate registration of coronary arteries for volumetric CT digital subtraction angiography , 2013, International Conference on Graphic and Image Processing.

[8]  Jong Beom Ra,et al.  Digital subtraction CT angiography based on efficient 3D registration and refinement. , 2004, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[9]  H. Venema,et al.  CT angiography of the circle of Willis and intracranial internal carotid arteries: maximum intensity projection with matched mask bone elimination-feasibility study. , 2001, Radiology.

[10]  H. Venema,et al.  Removal of bone in CT angiography of the cervical arteries by piecewise matched mask bone elimination. , 2004, Medical physics.

[11]  K. Yoshioka,et al.  Subtraction Coronary CT Angiography for the Evaluation of Severely Calcified Lesions Using a 320-Detector Row Scanner , 2011 .

[12]  Yvan R. Petillot,et al.  Multi-compartment heart segmentation in CT angiography using a spatially varying gaussian classifier , 2012, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[13]  R. Morin,et al.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 expert consensus document on coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. , 2010, Circulation.

[14]  K. Yoshioka,et al.  Improved evaluation of calcified segments on coronary CT angiography: a feasibility study of coronary calcium subtraction , 2013, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[15]  Alison Q. O'Neil,et al.  Objective evaluation of the correction by non-rigid registration of abdominal organ motion in low-dose 4D dynamic contrast-enhanced CT , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  C.-C. Jay Kuo,et al.  Nonlinear registration of serial coronary CT angiography (CCTA) for assessment of changes in atherosclerotic plaque. , 2010, Medical Physics (Lancaster).

[17]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. , 2008, European heart journal.

[18]  Antoine Rosset,et al.  Subtraction CT angiography of the lower limbs: a new technique for the evaluation of acute arterial occlusion. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.