Privacy in Transport? Exploring Perceptions of Location Privacy Through User Segmentation

Unanticipated accumulation and dissemination of accurate location information flows is the latest iteration of the privacy debate. This mixed-methods research contributes a grounded understanding of risk perceptions, enablers and barriers to privacy preserving behaviour in a cyber-physical environment. We conducted the first representative survey on internet privacy concerns, cyber and physical risk taking, privacy victimisation, usage of location sharing apps and transport choices in the UK with 466 participants. The responses segregated participants into four distinct, novel clusters (cyber risk takers, physical risk takers, transport innovators, and risk abstainers) with cross-validated prediction accuracy of 92%. In the second part of the study, we qualitatively explored these clusters through 12 homogeneous focus groups with 6 participants each. The predominant themes of the groups matched their clusters with little overlap between the groups. The differences in risk perception and behaviours varied greatly between the clusters. Future transport systems, apps and websites that rely on location data therefore need a more personalised approach to information provision surrounding location sharing. Failing to recognise these differences could lead to reduced data sharing, riskier sharing behaviour or even total avoidance of new forms of technology in transport.

[1]  Eija Kaasinen,et al.  User needs for location-aware mobile services , 2003, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[2]  Sumeet Gupta,et al.  The effects of privacy concerns and personal innovativeness on potential and experienced customers’ adoption of location-based services , 2009, Electron. Mark..

[3]  John Zimmerman,et al.  I’m the Mayor of My House: Examining Why People Use a Social-Driven Location Sharing Application , 2011 .

[4]  Elisabeth Uhlemann,et al.  Connected-Vehicles Applications Are Emerging [Connected Vehicles] , 2016, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine.

[5]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  H. Jeff Smith,et al.  Information Privacy: Measuring Individuals' Concerns About Organizational Practices , 1996, MIS Q..

[7]  Sudarson Jena,et al.  Correlation based feature selection with clustering for high dimensional data , 2018, Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology.

[8]  Syagnik Banerjee Geosurveillance, Location Privacy, and Personalization , 2019, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing.

[9]  Alfred Kobsa,et al.  FYI: communication style preferences underlie differences in location-sharing adoption and usage , 2013, UbiComp.

[10]  John Krumm,et al.  A survey of computational location privacy , 2009, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[11]  Tamara Dinev,et al.  Internet privacy concerns and their antecedents - measurement validity and a regression model , 2004, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[12]  E. Weber,et al.  A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) Scale for Adult Populations , 2006, Judgment and Decision Making.

[13]  Anthony Morton,et al.  “All my mates have got it, so it must be okay”: Constructing a Richer Understanding of Privacy Concerns—An Exploratory Focus Group Study , 2014 .

[14]  Simon Edward Parkin,et al.  Usability analysis of shared device ecosystem security: informing support for survivors of IoT-facilitated tech-abuse , 2019, NSPW.

[15]  M. Angela Sasse,et al.  Desperately seeking assurances: Segmenting users by their information-seeking preferences , 2014, 2014 Twelfth Annual International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust.

[16]  Ponnurangam Kumaraguru,et al.  Privacy Indexes: A Survey of Westin's Studies , 2005 .

[17]  Sören Preibusch,et al.  Guide to measuring privacy concern: Review of survey and observational instruments , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[18]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[19]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Trading-off location accuracy and service quality: Privacy concerns and user profiles , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Localization and GNSS (ICL-GNSS).

[20]  Spyros Kokolakis,et al.  Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon , 2017, Comput. Secur..

[21]  Bettina Grün,et al.  Required Sample Sizes for Data-Driven Market Segmentation Analyses in Tourism , 2014 .

[22]  Susan B. Barnes,et al.  A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States , 2006, First Monday.

[23]  Annie I. Antón,et al.  Examining Internet privacy policies within the context of user privacy values , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[24]  Michael Friedewald,et al.  Seven Types of Privacy , 2013, European Data Protection.

[25]  Ben Y. Zhao,et al.  Preserving Location Privacy in Geosocial Applications , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[26]  European data protection: coming of age , 2013 .