Ontology-based scenario modeling and analysis for bank stress testing

Abstract The 2008 banking crisis demonstrated that there is a lack of effective methods for modeling and analyzing “exceptional but plausible” risk scenarios in bank stress testing. Existing stress testing practices mainly focus on modeling probability-based risk factors and events in banking systems using historical data. Rare (low probability) risk events that can cause financial crises in banking systems, such as the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers, are largely ignored due to the lack of appropriate modeling and analysis methods. To address this problem, we propose an approach called Banking Event-driven Scenario-oriented Stress Testing (or simply, BESST) which has two main components: 1) an ontology-based event-driven scenario model (OESM), and 2) two analysis methods based on OESM for scenario recommendation and plausibility checking. The proposed BESST approach provides bank stress testing stakeholders an effective method for modeling and analyzing financial crisis scenarios that are rare but often have significant consequences.

[1]  Martin Scheicher,et al.  Macroeconomic Stress Testing: Preliminary Evidence for Austria , 2002 .

[2]  Huaiqing Wang,et al.  Knowledge level modeling for systemic risk management in financial institutions , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[3]  Philippe Jorion Value at risk: the new benchmark for controlling market risk , 1996 .

[4]  E. Tansley,et al.  Using ontology to validate conceptual models , 2003, CACM.

[5]  Yair Wand,et al.  Theoretical foundations for conceptual modelling in information systems development , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[6]  Eric S. K. Yu,et al.  Modeling organizations for information systems requirements engineering , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering.

[7]  Constantin Zopounidis,et al.  A multicriteria decision support system for bank rating , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[8]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  AI Models for Business Process Reengineering , 1996, IEEE Expert.

[9]  F. Longin,et al.  From value at risk to stress testing : The extreme value approach Franc ß ois , 2000 .

[10]  Michael Gruninger,et al.  Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Ontologies , 1995, IJCAI 1995.

[11]  J. Leon Zhao,et al.  Network-Based Modeling and Analysis of Systemic Risk in Banking Systems , 2012, MIS Q..

[12]  Julio Cesar Sampaio do Prado Leite,et al.  On Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering , 2009, Conceptual Modeling: Foundations and Applications.

[13]  Paola Velardi,et al.  Evaluation of OntoLearn, a Methodology for Automatic Learning of Domain Ontologies , 2005 .

[14]  Ajay S. Vinze,et al.  A business process context for Knowledge Management , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[15]  August-Wilhelm Scheer,et al.  ARIS - Business Process Modeling , 1998 .

[16]  Alexander M. Millkey The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable , 2009 .

[17]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  From object-oriented to goal-oriented requirements analysis , 1999, CACM.

[18]  Mario Quagliariello,et al.  Stress Testing the Banking System: Methodologies and Applications , 2009 .

[19]  J. Leon Zhao,et al.  Ranking Systemic Risks in Bank Networks , 2010, ICIS.

[20]  M. Hoeberichts,et al.  Modelling Scenario Analysis and Macro Stress-testing , 2006 .

[21]  Marco Sorge,et al.  Stress-Testing Financial Systems: An Overview of Current Methodologies , 2004 .

[22]  Helmut Elsinger,et al.  Risk Assessment for Banking Systems , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[23]  Huaiqing Wang,et al.  Ontologies for crisis contagion management in financial institutions , 2009, J. Inf. Sci..

[24]  Chengqi Zhang,et al.  Building an Ontology for Financial Investment , 2000, IDEAL.

[25]  Eric Yu,et al.  Modeling Strategic Relationships for Process Reengineering , 1995, Social Modeling for Requirements Engineering.

[26]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  Goal-oriented requirements analysis and reasoning in the Tropos methodology , 2005, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[27]  Sergio de Cesare,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Enterprise Information Systems a Literature Review on Business Process Modelling: New Frontiers of Reusability a Literature Review on Business Process Modelling: New Frontiers of Reusability , 2022 .

[28]  Nassim Nicholas Taleb,et al.  The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable , 2007 .

[29]  Ron Weber,et al.  Conceptual Modelling and Ontology: Possibilities and Pitfalls , 2002, ER.

[30]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  Ontologies for Knowledge Management: An Information Systems Perspective , 2004, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[31]  David Harel,et al.  Statecharts: A Visual Formalism for Complex Systems , 1987, Sci. Comput. Program..

[32]  Constantin Zopounidis,et al.  On the use of knowledge-based decision support systems in financial management: A survey , 1997, Decis. Support Syst..

[33]  Marco Sorge,et al.  A comparative analysis of macro stress-testing methodologies with application to Finland , 2006 .

[34]  Klaus Rheinberger,et al.  How to Find Plausible, Severe and Useful Stress Scenarios , 2012 .