Using Peer Teams to Lead Online Discussions

Abstract: This study investigated an online course in which groups of four students were used to lead online discussions. The teams were examined for their ability to bring instructional design, discourse facilitation, and direct instruction to the discussions. The setting was a graduate-level communications networks course delivered asynchronously to a cohort group of 17 adults enrolled for professional development education. Interviews, questionnaires, and content analyses of the discussion transcripts indicate that the peer teams fulfilled each of the three roles and valued the experience. Students preferred the peer teams to the instructor as discussion leaders and reported that the discussions were helpful in achieving higher order learning objectives but could have been more challenging and critical. Editors: Xiufeng Liu (U. Prince Edward Island, CA) Reviewers: Martha Gabriel (U. Prince Edward Island, Canada), William Hunter (U. Calgary, Canada), Gilly Salmon (Open U., UK)

[1]  Dwayne Harapnuik,et al.  Costs of Developing and Delivering a Web-based Instruction Course , 1998, WebNet.

[2]  Leslie R. Beach,et al.  Self-directed student groups and college learning , 1974 .

[3]  Diane E. Beals,et al.  Computer-mediated communication among beginning teachers , 1991 .

[4]  Robert K. Logan,et al.  The Fifth Language: Learning a Living in the Computer Age , 1995 .

[5]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course , 2000 .

[6]  Charles A. Fewson,et al.  Learning through discussion , 1979 .

[7]  Russel S. Hathaway,et al.  Computer Conferencing, Critical Reflection, and Teacher Development , 1994 .

[8]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Avoiding the Industrialization of Research Universities: Big and Little Distance Education. , 1999 .

[9]  Daniel C. A. Hillman,et al.  A New Method for Analyzing Patterns of Interaction , 1999 .

[10]  Herbert J. Walberg.  Teaching and Learning Through Discussion: The Theory, Research, and Practice of the Discussion Method. , 1991 .

[11]  T. Anderson,et al.  Online Social Interchange, Discord, and Knowledge Construction , 1998 .

[12]  J. Kremer,et al.  Cutting the cord: student‐led discussion groups in higher education , 1998 .

[13]  John S. Lochrie.  Perry revisited—A fresh look at Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years , 1989 .

[14]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .

[15]  D. Newman,et al.  A Content Analysis Method to Measure Critical Thinking in Face-to-Face and Computer Supported Group Learning , 1995 .

[16]  J. Darling.  Education, Democracy and Discussion. , 1980 .

[17]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[18]  B. H. Arbes,et al.  Faculty Consultation: A Study in Support of Education Through Student Interaction. , 1974 .

[19]  M. Berkowitz,et al.  Measuring the developmental features of moral discussion. , 1983 .

[20]  R. Burchfield.  Oxford English dictionary , 1982 .

[21]  Allan C. Tagg.  Leadership from Within: Student Moderation of Computer Conferences. , 1994 .

[22]  K. Kitchener,et al.  Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series and Jossey-Bass Social and Behavioral Science Series. , 2009 .

[23]  M. Bullen.  PARTICIPATION AND CRITICAL THINKING IN ONLINE UNIVERSITY DISTANCE EDUCATION , 1998 .

[24]  J. T. Dillon.  Using discussion in classrooms , 1994 .

[25]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Development of Thought: Equilibration of Cognitive Structures , 1977 .

[26]  L. Resnick,et al.  Knowing, Learning, and Instruction , 2018 .

[27]  Lauren Cifuentes,et al.  Students assume the mantle of moderating computer conferences: A case study , 1996 .

[28]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Guided, Cooperative Learning and Individual Knowledge Acquisition , 2018, Knowing, Learning, and Instruction.

[29]  R. Mason,et al.  Mindweave : communication, computers and distance education , 1989 .

[30]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[31]  W. James Potter,et al.  Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis , 1999 .

[32]  Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont,et al.  The social construction of meaning and cognitive activity in elementary school children , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[33]  Wim Gijselaers,et al.  Peer teaching: Academic achievement of teacher-led versus student-led discussion groups , 1985 .

[34]  Karen A. Maitland,et al.  Moral Judgment as a Function of Peer Group Interaction. , 1974 .

[35]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[36]  Colin Seymour-Ure,et al.  Content Analysis in Communication Research. , 1972 .

[37]  R. Clark.  Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media , 1983 .

[38]  Marcia B. Baxter Magolda.  Knowing and Reasoning in College: Gender-Related Patterns in Students' Intellectual Development , 1992 .

[39]  Douglas H. Clements,et al.  Social and Cognitive Interactions in Educational Computer Environments , 1988 .