Operating value optimisation using simulation and mixed integer programming

Mining operations around the world will increasingly need to operate at greater depths. This significantly influences the complexity of ore extraction and ore transportation to the surface. The increase in mine depth leads to increases in haulage distance from mine areas to the mine surface. This results in an increase in energy costs to haul material further. Due to the increasing cost of future operations, the choice of the haulage method becomes an important factor in the optimisation of the mine plan. The haulage process is one of the most energy intensive activities in a mining operation, and thus, one of the main contributors to energy cost. This paper presents the comparison of the operating values of the mine plans at depth levels of 1000, 2000 and 3000 m for diesel and electric trucks, shaft and belt conveyor haulage systems for the current and a predicted future energy price scenario. The aim is to analyse the impact of energy requirements associated with each haulage method, as well as the use of alternative sequencing techniques as mine depth increases. This study is carried out using a combination of discrete event simulation and mixed integer programming (MIP) as a tool to improve decision-making in the process of generating and optimising the mine plans. Results show that energy cost increases across each haulage method at both current and future energy prices, with increasing depth. This study thus provides a broad and up to date analysis of the impact on operating values that may be experienced with the use of the main haulage systems available at present. Also, the study shows how the combination of discrete event simulation and MIP generates a good tool for decision support.

[1]  W. Matthew Carlyle,et al.  Underground Planning at Stillwater Mining Company , 2001, Interfaces.

[2]  Zhongxue Li,et al.  New developments in simulation technology and applications in the minerals industry , 1997 .

[3]  John R. Sturgul Discrete mine system simulation in the United States , 1999 .

[4]  Erkan Topal,et al.  Integrated short and medium term underground mine production scheduling , 2012 .

[5]  Erkan Topal,et al.  Dynamic short term production scheduling and machine allocation in underground mining using mathematical programming , 2010 .

[6]  R. Faure,et al.  Introduction to operations research , 1968 .

[7]  Doreen A. Thomas,et al.  Network optimization for the design of underground mines , 2007 .

[8]  Erkan Topal,et al.  Early start and late start algorithms to improve the solution time for long-term underground mine production scheduling , 2008 .

[9]  Dingena L. Schott,et al.  A Methodology to Predict Power Savings of Troughed Belt Conveyors by Speed Control , 2011 .

[10]  C. Alford,et al.  Optimisation in underground mine design , 1996 .

[11]  Dragan Komljenovic,et al.  Haul truck fuel consumption and CO 2 emission under various engine load conditions , 2010 .

[12]  Frederick S. Hillier,et al.  Introduction of Operations Research , 1967 .

[13]  F. E. Scott Diesels underground: overcoming a bad image , 1982 .

[14]  Eric R. Zieyel Operations research : applications and algorithms , 1988 .

[15]  George N. Panagiotou Discrete mine system simulation in Europe , 1999 .

[16]  T. Novak,et al.  Comparative performance study of diesel and electric face-haulage vehicles , 1987 .

[17]  Thomas J. Schriber Perspectives on Simulation using GPSS , 1988, Winter Simulation Conference.

[18]  Erkan Topal,et al.  A new mathematical programming model for production schedule optimization in underground mining operations , 2010 .