Numerical Simulation of Local Pharmacokinetics of a Drug after Intravascular Delivery with an Eluting Stent

We use mathematical modelling to delineate the influence of two important factors on local pharmacokinetics of a drug delivered via an eluting stent, namely: (1) diffusional resistance of a stent coating, and (2) reversible binding of a drug to the vascular tissue. A system of differential equations that describes diffusion of the drug out of the polymeric coating of the stent into the vascular tissue and into the bloodstream, as well as reversible binding of the drug within the vascular tissue, was solved numerically and the spatial profiles of the concentration of the drug at various points of time were produced and analysed. Also, kinetic curves of the spatial average concentration of the drug within the wall were constructed, and the areas under those curves (AUC) were calculated. The simulations showed that AUC might be enhanced, if the stent is coated with a continuous layer of a drug-releasing medium with a high diffusional resistance. Both the residence time and the average concentration of the drug within the vascular wall increase in this case mainly because the coating imposes a diffusional barrier between the vascular tissue and the bloodstream, thereby reducing the wash-out. If the drug reversibly binds to the tissue, the residence time increases greatly, but the AUC for the free (unbound) drug remains unchanged, implying that the presence of the drug in the vessel is prolonged at the expense of a proportional reduction in concentration of a free drug within the tissue. These findings justify the design of eluting stents with continuous coatings with enhanced diffusional resistance and the engineering of drugs with enhanced affinity to the vascular matrix. Reversible binding to tissue may be beneficial for prolonging the presence of the drug in the target tissue, and for avoiding potential toxic peak effects of high concentrations of the free (unbound) drug.

[1]  M. Slepian Polymeric endoluminal gel paving: therapeutic hydrogel barriers and sustained drug delivery depots for local arterial wall biomanipulation. , 1996, Seminars in interventional cardiology : SIIC.

[2]  D. L. Fry,et al.  Mathematical models of arterial transmural transport. , 1985, The American journal of physiology.

[3]  W. Edwards,et al.  Fibrin-film stenting in a porcine coronary injury model: efficacy and safety compared with uncoated stents. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  J. Lasala,et al.  Comparison of methods for local delivery of tissue factor pathway inhibitor to balloon-injured arteries in rabbits. , 1999, Coronary artery disease.

[5]  E. Edelman,et al.  Tissue average binding and equilibrium distribution: an example with heparin in arterial tissues. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[6]  A. Yeung,et al.  Effect of local delivery of L-arginine on in-stent restenosis in humans. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  H. Nygren,et al.  Kinetics of antigen-antibody reactions at solid-liquid interfaces. , 1988, Journal of immunological methods.

[8]  D. Rijken,et al.  Polylysine as a Vehicle for Extracellular Matrix-Targeted Local Drug Delivery, Providing High Accumulation and Long-Term Retention Within the Vascular Wall , 2001, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[9]  D. Mason,et al.  The kinetics of antibody binding to membrane antigens in solution and at the cell surface. , 1980, The Biochemical journal.

[10]  A. Gershlick,et al.  In vitro evaluation of c7E3-Fab (ReoPro) eluting polymer-coated coronary stents. , 2000, Cardiovascular research.

[11]  R. Wilensky,et al.  Increased Intramural Retention After Local Delivery of Molecules with Increased Binding Properties: Implications for Regional Delivery of Pharmacologic Agents , 1999, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics.

[12]  E. Edelman,et al.  Arterial paclitaxel distribution and deposition. , 2000, Circulation research.

[13]  E. Edelman,et al.  Measurement of drug distribution in vascular tissue using quantitative fluorescence microscopy. , 1999, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[14]  E J Topol,et al.  Sustained local delivery of dexamethasone by a novel intravascular eluting stent to prevent restenosis in the porcine coronary injury model. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  E. Edelman,et al.  Computational simulations of local vascular heparin deposition and distribution. , 1996, The American journal of physiology.

[16]  J. Hubbell,et al.  Intraarterial protein delivery via intimally-adherent bilayer hydrogels. , 2000, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[17]  W. J. van der Giessen,et al.  Mechanisms of drug loading and release kinetics. , 1998, Seminars in interventional cardiology : SIIC.

[18]  J. Tarbell,et al.  Numerical simulation of mass transfer in porous media of blood vessel walls. , 1997, The American journal of physiology.

[19]  R. Busse,et al.  Vascular Gene Transfer of Phosphomimetic Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (S1177D) Using Ultrasound-Enhanced Destruction of Plasmid-Loaded Microbubbles Improves Vasoreactivity , 2002, Circulation.

[20]  R. Schwartz,et al.  Novel stents for the prevention of restenosis. , 1997, Trends in cardiovascular medicine.

[21]  E. Edelman,et al.  Physiological Transport Forces Govern Drug Distribution for Stent-Based Delivery , 2001, Circulation.

[22]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  Novel Drug-Delivery Stent: Intravascular Ultrasound Observations From the First Human Experience With the QP2-Eluting Polymer Stent System , 2001, Circulation.

[23]  E. Edelman,et al.  Coated stents: local pharmacology. , 1998, Seminars in interventional cardiology : SIIC.

[24]  P. Serruys,et al.  Recent Developments in Coated Stents. , 2001, Current interventional cardiology reports.