Factors affecting bony impingement in hip arthroplasty.

Computer modeling of 10 patients' computed tomographic scans was used to study the variables affecting hip arthroplasty range of motion before bony impingement (ROMBI) including acetabular offset and height, femoral offset, height and anteversion, and osteophyte removal. The ROMBI was compared with the ROM before component impingement and the native hip ROM. The ROMBI decreased with decreased total offset and limb shortening. Acetabular offset and height had a greater effect on ROMBI than femoral offset and height. The ROMBI lost with decreased acetabular offset was not fully recoverable with an increase in femoral offset or osteophyte removal. Bony impingement increased and component impingement decreased with decreased acetabular offset and increased head diameter.

[1]  Richard D. Gill,et al.  Multivariate Survival Analysis , 1993 .

[2]  K. An,et al.  Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  F. Kummer,et al.  The effect of acetabular cup orientations on limiting hip rotation. , 1999, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  Fumihiro Yoshimine,et al.  A mathematical formula to calculate the theoretical range of motion for total hip replacement. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Fumihiro Yoshimine,et al.  The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Frank Langlotz,et al.  Noninvasive three‐dimensional assessment of femoroacetabular impingement , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[7]  A. McCaskie,et al.  Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  N. Zacharakis,et al.  A 12- to 18-year radiographic follow-up study of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. The role of the center of rotation. , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  I C Clarke,et al.  Prosthetic hip range of motion and impingement. The effects of head and neck geometry. , 1982, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  W H Harris,et al.  Range of motion in contemporary total hip arthroplasty. The impact of modular head-neck components. , 1991, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  John J Callaghan,et al.  Kinematics, kinetics, and finite element analysis of commonplace maneuvers at risk for total hip dislocation. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  S. Kelley.  High hip center in revision arthroplasty. , 1994, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[13]  J. Charnley,et al.  Total hip replacement by low-friction arthroplasty. , 1970, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  P. Sharkey,et al.  Effect of Femoral Component Offset on Polyethylene Wear in Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  Johnston Rc,et al.  Hip motion measurements for selected activities of daily living. , 1970 .

[16]  W. Hutton,et al.  Impingement after total hip arthroplasty related to prosthetic component selection and range of motion. , 1997, Journal of the Southern Orthopaedic Association.

[17]  D. D’Lima,et al.  The Effect of the Orientation of the Acetabular and Femoral Components on the Range of Motion of the Hip at Different Head-Neck Ratios* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  W. Harris,et al.  Total hip replacement for developmental dysplasia of the hip. , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  O. Mahoney,et al.  Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[20]  S. Delp,et al.  How Superior Placement of the Joint Center in Hip Arthroplasty Affects the Abductor Muscles , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  M. Seki,et al.  Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer‐aided design simulation , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[22]  R. Robinson,et al.  Joint motion and surface contact area related to component position in total hip arthroplasty. , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[23]  B. Zurfluh,et al.  Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[24]  T. Kallos,et al.  Low-friction arthroplasty. , 1972, JAMA.

[25]  D. D’Lima,et al.  Optimizing Acetabular Component Position to Minimize Impingement and Reduce Contact Stress , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  M. Maynard,et al.  Modern technique of cemented total hip arthroplasty , 1991 .

[27]  J. Moreland,et al.  Wear Is a Function of Use, Not Time , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[28]  R. Johnston,et al.  Coxarthrosis after congenital dysplasia. Treatment by total hip arthroplasty without acetabular bone-grafting. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[29]  F. Pauwels.  Die Bedeutung der Bauprinzipien des Sttz-und Bewegungsapparates fr die Beanspruchung der Rhrenknochen: Erster Beitrag zur funktionellen Anatomie und kausalen Morphologie des Sttzapparates , 1948 .

[30]  R. Brand,et al.  Total hip acetabular component position affects component loosening rates. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[31]  F. J. Shelley,et al.  Effect of superior and superolateral relocations of the hip center on hip joint forces. An experimental and analytical analysis. , 1996, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[32]  S B Sepic,et al.  Roentgenographic measurements after Müller total hip replacement. Correlations among roentgenographic measurements and hip strength and mobility. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[33]  K. Widmer,et al.  The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[34]  W. Harris,et al.  Proximal placement of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. A long-term follow-up study. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[35]  P. D. Wilson,et al.  Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. A two to five-year follow-up. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[36]  B. Jaramaz,et al.  Computer Assisted Measurement of Cup Placement in Total Hip Replacement , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[37]  K. Takaoka,et al.  Factors Affecting Aseptic Failure of Fixation after Primary Charnley Total Hip Arthroplasty. Multivariate Survival Analysis* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[38]  R. Crowninshield,et al.  Reconstruction of the hip. A mathematical approach to determine optimum geometric relationships. , 1979, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[39]  F. Linde,et al.  Charnley arthroplasty in osteoarthritis secondary to congenital dislocation or subluxation of the hip. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[40]  J. Feagin,et al.  Low-friction arthroplasty in congenital subluxation of the hip. , 1973, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[41]  C. Ranawat,et al.  Total hip arthroplasty in protrusio acetabuli of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[42]  B. Wroblewski,et al.  Wear of the cup in the Charnley LFA in the young patient. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[43]  L. Dorr,et al.  Medial protrusio technique for placement of a porous-coated, hemispherical acetabular component without cement in a total hip arthroplasty in patients who have acetabular dysplasia. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[44]  T. Akiyama,et al.  :A long term follow-up study , 1982 .

[45]  Shantanu Patil,et al.  Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject‐specific approach , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[46]  V. T. Inman.  Functional aspects of the abductor muscles of the hip. , 1947, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[47]  Philip C. Noble,et al.  The Effect of Femoral Component Head Size on Posterior Dislocation of the Artificial Hip Joint* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[48]  B. Jolles,et al.  Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[49]  W H Harris,et al.  High placement of an acetabular component inserted without cement in a revision total hip arthroplasty. Results after a mean of ten years. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[50]  T. Kubo,et al.  Effect of Acetabular Cup Position and Orientation in Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[51]  D J Schurman,et al.  Range of motion studies for total hip replacements. A comparative study with a new experimental apparatus. , 1975, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[52]  W. Harris,et al.  Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[53]  A. Hanssen,et al.  The Effect of Superior Placement of the Acetabular Component on the Rate of Loosening after Total Hip Arthroplasty. Long-Term Results in Patients Who Have Crowe Type-II Congenital Dysplasia of the Hip* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[54]  S B Murphy,et al.  Acetabular dysplasia in the adolescent and young adult. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.