Lead users and technology transfer to less-developed countries: analysis with an application to Haiti.

Abstract This paper discusses the role that cross-cultural factors play in the process of technology transfer. The specific focus is an investigation of implementation mechanisms that facilitate technology transfer in an environment in which cultural factors exert a significant influence. The frameworks of Niehoff and Anderson and of Wicklein are discussed in describing such issues as cultural distance (as described by Hofstede), negotiation and people-to-people relationships, the learning ability of a society, abstractive versus associative cultures, and appropriate technology choices. It is argued that these traditional frameworks are not sufficient to overcome the inherent problems of cultural distance and “sticky” information regarding the associated costs of transferring information to a specified site in a form that will be usable by a given information seeker. The Lead User methodology developed by von Hippel is discussed as a new approach for facilitating technology transfer to less-developed countries. The discussion of the Lead User methodology is linked to analysis of a particular technology transfer project undertaken by a team of faculty researchers from Fairfield University in the rural community of Fondwa located in Haiti. The team's implementation of a solar cooker project is discussed in detail, particularly as it reflects an attempt to utilize the Lead User framework.

[1]  C. Scheraga,et al.  Transferring technology: costs and benefits , 1998 .

[2]  Lawrence M. Wein,et al.  Economics of Product Development by Users: the Impact of Sticky Local Information , 1998 .

[3]  C. G. Glenn,et al.  Man and Mankind: Conflict and Communication Between Cultures , 1981 .

[4]  E. Hippel Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[5]  B. D. Paul,et al.  Health, Culture, and Community , 1956 .

[6]  Narayan S. Umanath,et al.  Differential Diffusion of Information Systems Technology in Multinational Enterprises: A Research Model , 1994 .

[7]  G. Foster,et al.  Traditional Cultures: and the Impact of Technological Change , 1962 .

[8]  M. V. Glinow,et al.  United States-China Technology Transfer , 1990 .

[9]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[10]  Robert C. Wicklein Designing for appropriate technology in developing countries , 1998 .

[11]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  International Technology Adoption , 1994 .

[12]  Ben L. Kedia,et al.  Cultural Constraints on Transfer of Technology Across Nations: Implications for Research in International and Comparative Management , 1988 .

[13]  The Design of Micro-Projects and Macro-Policies: Examples From Three Appropriate Technology Proj ects in Africa , 1992 .

[14]  Pradip K. Ghosh,et al.  Appropriate Technology in Third World Development , 1984 .

[15]  M. V. Glinow,et al.  Technology transfer in international business , 1991 .

[16]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[17]  M. Polanyi,et al.  Personal Knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy , 1959 .

[18]  M. Bond,et al.  The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth , 1988 .

[19]  Carlos Alberto de Medina,et al.  Human Problems in Technological Change , 1967 .