US/UK Mental Models of Planning: The Relationship Between Plan Detail and Plan Quality

This paper presents the results of a research study applying a new cultural analysis method to capture commonalities and differences between US and UK mental models of operational planning. The results demonstrate the existence of fundamental differences between the way US and UK planners think about what it means to have a high quality plan. Specifically, the present study captures differences in how US and UK planners conceptualize plan quality. Explicit models of cultural differences in conceptions of plan quality are useful for establishing performance metrics for multinational planning teams. This paper discusses the prospects of enabling automatic evaluation of multinational team performance by combining recent advances in cultural modelling with enhanced ontology languages.

[1]  Michael W. Morris,et al.  Reasons as Carriers of Culture: Dynamic vs. Dispositional Models of Cultural Influence on Decision Making. Рассуждения как носители культуры: динамическая и диспозитная модели культурного влияния на принятие решений , 2000 .

[2]  Christopher R. Paparone US Army Decisionmaking: Past, Present and Future , 2001 .

[3]  Gina Kingston,et al.  Network-Centric Operations Case Study: The Stryker Brigade Combat Team , 2005 .

[4]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  Linda Pierce,et al.  Improving Multicultural Teamwork to Combat Terrorism , 2006 .

[6]  E. Salas,et al.  Shared mental models in expert team decision making. , 1993 .

[7]  C. Earley,et al.  Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. , 2000 .

[8]  K. Kraiger,et al.  Conceptual Development and Empirical Evaluation of Measures of Shared Mental Models as Indicators of Team Effectiveness , 1997 .

[9]  David S Alberts,et al.  Planning: Complex Endeavors , 2007 .

[10]  D. Nicholson,et al.  Cultural Network Analysis: Method and Application , 2010 .

[11]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[12]  D. Sperber,et al.  Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach , 1998 .

[13]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. , 2001, Psychological review.

[14]  N. M. Morris,et al.  On Looking into the Black Box: Prospects and Limits in the Search for Mental Models , 1986 .

[15]  Lester W. Grau COUNTERINSURGENCY LESSONS FROM MALAYA AND VIETNAM: Learning to Eat Soup with a Knife , 2004 .

[16]  D. Hantula Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions , 2001 .

[17]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[18]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor? , 1994 .

[19]  G. Hofstede Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations , 2001 .

[20]  James Hendler,et al.  Progress on the Collaborative Planning Model , 2008 .

[21]  L. Garro,et al.  Remembering What One Knows and the Construction of the Past: A Comparison of Cultural Consensus Theory and Cultural Schema Theory , 2000 .

[22]  D. Medin,et al.  The cultural mind: environmental decision making and cultural modeling within and across populations. , 2005, Psychological review.

[23]  Charles C. Snow,et al.  When Groups Consist of Multiple Nationalities: Towards a New Understanding of the Implications , 1998 .

[24]  Alun D. Preece,et al.  The International Technology Alliance in Network and Information Sciences , 2007, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[25]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  OWL Web ontology language overview , 2004 .

[26]  James A. Hendler,et al.  The Semantic Web" in Scientific American , 2001 .

[27]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  Web Ontology Language: OWL , 2004, Handbook on Ontologies.

[28]  Allan Bird,et al.  Beyond sophisticated stereotyping: Cultural sensemaking in context , 2000 .

[29]  D. Wegner Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .