Refining temperature measures in thermal/optical carbon analysis

Abstract. Thermal/optical methods have been widely used for quantifying total carbon (TC), organic carbon (OC), and elemental carbon (EC) in ambient and source particulate samples. Thermally defined carbon fractions have been used for source identification. Temperature precision in thermal carbon analysis is critical to the allocation of carbon fractions. The sample temperature is determined by a thermocouple, which is usually located in the oven near the sample. Sample and thermocouple temperature may differ owing to different thermal properties between the sample filter punch and the thermocouple, or inhomogeneities in the heating zone. Quick-drying temperature-indicating liquids (Tempil Inc., South Plainfield, NJ) of different liquefying points are used as temperature calibration standards. These consist of chemicals that change their appearance at specific temperatures and can be optically monitored to determine the sample temperature. Temperature measures were evaluated for three different models of carbon analyzers. Sample temperatures were found to differ from sensor temperatures by 10 to 50°C. Temperature biases of 14 to 22°C during thermal analysis were found to change carbon fraction measurements. The temperature indicators allow calibration curves to be constructed that relate the sample temperature to the temperature measured by a thermocouple.

[1]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  Characterization of airborne carbonate over a site near Asian dust source regions during spring 2002 and its climatic and environmental significance , 2005 .

[2]  J. Chow,et al.  Air Quality Measurements from the Fresno Supersite , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[3]  L. Chen,et al.  Modeling reflectance and transmittance of quartz-fiber filter samples containing elemental carbon particles: Implications for thermal/optical analysis , 2004 .

[4]  R. Cary,et al.  Elemental Carbon-Based Method for Monitoring Occupational Exposures to Particulate Diesel Exhaust , 1996 .

[5]  P. Hopke,et al.  Improving source identification of fine particles in a rural northeastern U.S. area utilizing temperature‐resolved carbon fractions , 2004 .

[6]  Jian Zhen Yu,et al.  Uncertainties in charring correction in the analysis of elemental and organic carbon in atmospheric particles by thermal/optical methods. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  J. Watson.  Visibility: Science and Regulation , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[8]  John Lucas,et al.  Thermal study of decomposition of selected biomass samples , 2003 .

[9]  M. Poore.  Levoglucosan in PM2.5 at the Fresno Supersite , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[10]  Hélène Cachier,et al.  Determination of atmospheric soot carbon with a simple thermal method , 1989 .

[11]  J. Brook,et al.  Identification of the major sources contributing to PM2.5 observed in Toronto. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Philip K Hopke,et al.  Source Apportionment of Fine Particles in Washington, DC, Utilizing Temperature-Resolved Carbon Fractions , 2004, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[13]  P. Hopke,et al.  Source apportionment for ambient particles in the San Gorgonio wilderness , 2004 .

[14]  J. Lewtas,et al.  Source apportionment of PM2.5 at an urban IMPROVE site in Seattle, Washington. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  N. Mihalopoulos,et al.  Characterization of carbonaceous aerosols during the MINOS campaign in Crete, July–August 2001: a multi-analytical approach , 2003 .

[16]  J. Chow,et al.  Particle Size Relationships at the Fresno Supersite , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[17]  Judith C Chow,et al.  Comparison of PM2.5 carbon measurement methods in Hong Kong, China. , 2005, Environmental pollution.

[18]  J. A. Bain.  Differential Thermal Analysis , 1972, Mineralogical Magazine.

[19]  H. Cachier,et al.  Thermal Separation of Soot Carbon , 1989 .

[20]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  The dri thermal/optical reflectance carbon analysis system: description, evaluation and applications in U.S. Air quality studies , 1993 .

[21]  P. Groblicki,et al.  An Evaluation of Methods for the Determination of Organic and Elemental Carbon in Particulate Samples , 1982 .

[22]  Howard C. Blue,et al.  Chapter 7. , 2007 .

[23]  J. Chow,et al.  A wintertime PM2.5 episode at the Fresno, CA, supersite , 2002 .

[24]  Sverre Vedal,et al.  Ambient particles and health: lines that divide. , 1997, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[25]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  PM2.5 carbonate concentrations at regionally representative Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environment sites , 2002 .

[26]  Hans Moosmüller,et al.  Equivalence of elemental carbon by thermal/optical reflectance and transmittance with different temperature protocols. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  J. Shah,et al.  Analysis of Organic and Elemental Carbon in Ambient Aerosols by a Thermal-Optical Method , 1982 .

[28]  J. Schauer,et al.  Source Apportionment of Wintertime Gas-Phase and Particle-Phase Air Pollutants Using Organic Compounds as Tracers , 2000 .

[29]  Susan M. Larson,et al.  Intercomparison of measurement methods for black carbon aerosols , 1999 .

[30]  S. Arrhenius.  Über die Reaktionsgeschwindigkeit bei der Inversion von Rohrzucker durch Säuren , 1889 .

[31]  L. A. Currie,et al.  A critical evaluation of inter-laboratory data on total, elemental and isotopic carbon in the carbonaceous particle reference material , 2002 .

[32]  Hampden Kuhns,et al.  Source profiles for industrial, mobile, and area sources in the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational study. , 2004, Chemosphere.

[33]  Philip K. Hopke,et al.  Improving source identification of Atlanta aerosol using temperature resolved carbon fractions in positive matrix factorization , 2004 .

[34]  L. Chen,et al.  Summary of Organic and Elemental Carbon/Black Carbon Analysis Methods and Intercomparisons , 2005 .

[35]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  Comparison of IMPROVE and NIOSH Carbon Measurements , 2001 .

[36]  M. Jacobson,et al.  Strong radiative heating due to the mixing state of black carbon in atmospheric aerosols , 2022 .

[37]  Barbara J. Turpin,et al.  Investigation of organic aerosol sampling artifacts in the los angeles basin , 1994 .

[38]  D. Roy.  New bookDifferential thermal analysis: Vol. 1, fundamental aspects: Edited by R. C. Mackenzie. 1970. Academic Press., Inc. New York. xv + 775 pp., illus. $33 , 1971 .

[39]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of in situ and filter carbon measurements at the Fresno Supersite , 2002 .

[40]  L. A. Currie,et al.  A Critical Evaluation of Interlaboratory Data on Total, Elemental, and Isotopic Carbon in the Carbonaceous Particle Reference Material, NIST SRM 1649a , 2002, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[41]  T. Novakov.  SOOT IN THE ATMOSPHERE , 1982 .

[42]  Philip K. Hopke,et al.  Comparison between Conditional Probability Function and Nonparametric Regression for Fine Particle Source Directions , 2004 .

[43]  J. Chow,et al.  Results of the "Carbon Conference" International Aerosol Carbon Round Robin Test Stage I , 2001 .