Performance Analysis of Traditional and Improved Transformer Differential Protective Relays

This paper describes a new approach for transformer differential protection that ensures security for external faults, inrush, and overexcitation conditions and provides dependability for internal faults. This approach combines harmonic restraint and blocking methods with a wave shape recognition technique. First, we review the concept of transformer differential protection. We then analyze magnetizing inrush, overexcitation, and current transformer (CT) saturation phenomena as possible causes of relay misoperation. After summarizing the existing methods for discriminating internal faults from inrush and overexcitation conditions, we propose a new approach for transformer differential protection and describe the relay that is based on this approach. Finally, we compare the behavior of some of these methods for real cases of magnetizing inrush conditions. INTRODUCTION Three characteristics generally provide means for detecting transformer internal faults [1]. These characteristics include an increase in phase currents, an increase in the differential current, and gas formation caused by the fault arc [2], [3]. When transformer internal faults occur, immediate disconnection of the faulted transformer is necessary to avoid extensive damage and/or preserve power system stability and power quality. Three types of protection are normally used to detect these faults: overcurrent protection for phase currents, differential protection for differential currents, and gas accumulator or rate-of-pressure-rise protection for arcing faults. Overcurrent protection with fuses or relays provided the first type of transformer fault protection [4]; it continues to be applied in small capacity transformers. Connecting an inverse-time overcurrent relay in the paralleled secondaries of the current transformers introduced the differential principle to transformer protection [4]. The percentage differential principle [5], which was immediately applied to transformer protection [4], [6], [7], provided excellent results in improving the security of differential protection for external faults with CT saturation. This analysis will focus primarily on differential protection. Differential relays are prone to misoperation in the presence of transformer inrush currents, which result from transients in transformer magnetic flux. The first solution to this problem was to introduce an intentional time delay in the differential relay [4], [6]. Another proposal was to desensitize the relay for a given time, to override the inrush condition [6], [7]. Others suggested adding a voltage signal to restrain [4] or to supervise the differential relay [8]. Researchers quickly recognized that the harmonic content of the differential current provided information that helped differentiate faults from inrush conditions. Kennedy and Hayward proposed a differential relay with only harmonic restraint for bus protection [9]. Hayward [10]

[1]  Grigoriĭ Iosifovich Atabekov The relay protection of high voltage networks , 1960 .

[2]  C. A. Mathews An improved transformer differential relay , 1954, Electrical Engineering.

[3]  T. R. Specht,et al.  Transformer magnetizing inrush currents , 1951, Electrical Engineering.

[4]  R. L. Bean,et al.  A Sudden Gas Pressure Relay for Transformer Protection [includes discussion] , 1953, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. Part III: Power Apparatus and Systems.

[5]  M. Hegazy New principle for using full-wave rectifiers in differential protection of transformers , 1969 .

[6]  W. K. Sonnemann,et al.  Current transformers and relays for high-speed differential protection, with particular reference to offset transient currents , 1940, Electrical Engineering.

[7]  E. C. Wentz,et al.  Detection of faults in power transformers , 1957, Electrical Engineering.

[8]  C. D. Hayward Harmonic-Current-Restrained Relays for Transformer Differential Protection , 1941, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers.

[9]  G. D. Rockefeller,et al.  Magnetizing Inrush Phenomena in Transformer Banks , 1958, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. Part III: Power Apparatus and Systems.

[10]  F. L. Hamilton,et al.  The application of transductors as relays to protective gear , 1952 .

[11]  L. F. Kennedy,et al.  Harmonic-Current-Restrained Relays for Differential Protection , 1938, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers.

[12]  S. E. Zocholl,et al.  Transformer modeling as applied to differential protection , 1996, Proceedings of 1996 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering.

[13]  W. E. Glassburn,et al.  A Transformer Differential Relay with Second-Harmonic Restraint , 1958, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. Part III: Power Apparatus and Systems.

[14]  E. L. Michelson Rectifier relay for transformer protection , 1945, Electrical Engineering.

[15]  J. T. Madill Typical Transformer Faults and Gas Detector Relay Protection , 1947, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers.

[16]  C. Concordia,et al.  Transient Characteristics of Current Transformers During Faults , 1942, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers.

[17]  E. L. Harder,et al.  Principles and Practices of Relaying in the United States , 1948, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers.

[18]  I. T. Monseth,et al.  Relay systems : theory and application , 1935 .

[19]  M. Suzuki,et al.  Digital protection method for power transformers based on an equivalent circuit composed of inverse inductance , 1988 .

[20]  G. D. Rockefeller,et al.  Fault Protection with a Digital Computer , 1969 .

[21]  J. Thorp,et al.  A New Computer-Based Flux-Restrained Current-Differential Relay for Power Transformer Protection , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[22]  C. A. Mathews An Improved Transformer Differential Relay [includes discussion] , 1954, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. Part III: Power Apparatus and Systems.

[23]  R. E. Cordray,et al.  Percentage-differential transformer protection , 1931, Electrical Engineering.

[24]  D. E. Marshall,et al.  Current Transformer Excitation Under Transit Conditions , 1929, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers.

[25]  W. R. Brownlee Transformer magnetizing inrush currents and influence on system operation , 1944, Electrical Engineering.

[26]  Report on Transformer Magnetizing Current and Its Effect on Relaying and Air Switch Operation , 1951, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers.

[27]  C. D. Hayward Prolonged inrush currents with parallel transformers affect differential relaying , 1941, Electrical Engineering.

[28]  C.-H. Einvall,et al.  A three-phase differential relay for transformer protection , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[29]  A.G. Phadke,et al.  A Microprocessor Based Three-Phase Transformer Differential Relay , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[30]  T. R. Specht,et al.  Transformer magnetizing inrush currents , 1951, Electrical Engineering.

[31]  A. G. Phadke,et al.  A New Computer-Based Flux-Restrained Current-Differential Relay for Power Transformer Protection , 1983, IEEE Power Engineering Review.