Fostering Reading Comprehension in Fifth Grade by Explicit Instruction in Reading Strategies and Peer Tutoring.

Background: Research reveals that explicit reading strategies instruction and engaging students in interaction about texts promote students' reading comprehension ability. The present intervention study combines both aspects. Aims: The study examines the educational benefits of explicit reading strategies instruction, followed by practice in (a) teacher-led whole-class activities (STRAT), (b) reciprocal same-age (STRAT + SA), or (c) cross-age peer tutoring activities (STRAT + CA) on fifth graders' reading comprehension achievement. Sample: Twenty-two fifth-grade teachers and their 454 students from 19 different schools throughout Flanders (Belgium) participated. Method: A quasi-experimental pretest post-test retention test design was used with three experimental (STRAT, STRAT + SA, and STRAT + CA) and a matched control group. The experimental interventions were implemented during an entire school year. Results: Multilevel analysis revealed that the STRAT and STRAT + CA condition made a significantly larger pretest to retention test progress than the control group. The significant major progress was especially situated from pretest to post-test, during which the intervention took place. Concerning the STRAT + SA condition no significant differences with regard to the control group were detected. Pairwise comparisons of the experimental conditions indicated that the STRAT + CA condition's progress from pretest to retention test also exceeded the STRAT + SA condition's advancement significantly. Conclusion: The study corroborated the efficacy of the STRAT and STRAT + CA conditions' interventions as feasible tools to enhance fifth graders' reading comprehension achievement.

[1]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Reading Comprehension Strategies for Students with Learning Disabilities Who Use English as a Second Language , 1996, The Elementary School Journal.

[2]  Janice F. Almasi.  The Nature of Fourth Graders' Sociocognitive Conflicts in Peer-Led and Teacher-Led Discussions of Literature. IRA Outstanding Dissertation Award for 1993-94. , 1994 .

[3]  Joop J. Hox,et al.  Applied Multilevel Analysis. , 1995 .

[4]  The classwide peer tutoring program: implementation factors moderating students' achievement. , 1992, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[5]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .

[6]  Erik De Corte,et al.  Marrying theory building and the improvement of school practice: a permanent challenge for instructional psychology , 2000 .

[7]  E. Corte,et al.  Improving text comprehension strategies in upper primary school children: a design experiment. , 2001, The British journal of educational psychology.

[8]  Karen Linn Bierman,et al.  Effects of Role and Assignment Rationale on Attitudes Formed During Peer Tutoring. , 1981, Journal of educational psychology.

[9]  Scott G. Paris,et al.  Children's reading strategies, metacognition, and motivation , 1986 .

[10]  Achievement, placement, and services: Middle school benefits of Classwide Peer Tutoring used at the elementary school. , 1993 .

[11]  M. Pressley.  What should reading instructional research be the research of , 1999 .

[12]  Charles R. Greenwood,et al.  The use of peer tutoring strategies in classroom management and educational instruction. , 1988 .

[13]  Noreen M. Webb,et al.  Developing productive group interaction in middle school mathematics , 1999 .

[14]  H. Walberg,et al.  Can Comprehension Be Taught? , 1988 .

[15]  Donald F. Dansereau,et al.  Manipulating cooperative scripts for teaching and learning. , 1987 .

[16]  P. V. Meter,et al.  A Quasi-experimental Validation of Transactional Strategies Instruction with Low-Achieving Second-Grade Readers. , 1996 .

[17]  W. Schneider,et al.  Reading achievement, metacognition, reading self-concept and interest: A study of German students in grades 3 and 4 , 1999 .

[18]  P. David Pearson,et al.  Moving From the Old to the New: Research on Reading Comprehension Instruction , 1991 .

[19]  Marie-France Ehrlich,et al.  Cognitive and Motivational Determinants of Reading Comprehension in Good and Poor Readers , 1993 .

[20]  H. Goldstein.  Multilevel Statistical Models , 2006 .

[21]  M. Horvat,et al.  Effects of Collaborative Peer Tutoring on Urban Seventh Graders , 1995 .

[22]  Cor Aarnoutse,et al.  Development of Poor and Better Readers During the Elementary School , 2000 .

[23]  Annette F. Gourgey.  Metacognition in basic skills instruction , 1998 .

[24]  B. Rosenshine,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching: A Review of the Research , 1994 .

[25]  Janice F. Almasi,et al.  Beyond Direct Explanation: Transactional Instruction of Reading Comprehension Strategies , 1992, The Elementary School Journal.

[26]  P. David Pearson.  Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[27]  R. Weisberg.  1980s: A Change in Focus of Reading Comprehension Research: A Review of Reading/Learning Disabilities Research Based on an Interactive Model of Reading , 1988 .

[28]  Charles R. Greenwood,et al.  Classwide Peer Tutoring , 1986 .

[29]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  The Nature of Student Interactions During Peer Tutoring With and Without Prior Training and Experience , 1994 .

[30]  Karen K. Wixson,et al.  Becoming a strategic reader , 1983 .

[31]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Examining the Context of Strategy Instruction , 1991 .

[32]  C. Fitz-Gibbon.  Peer Tutoring as a Teaching Strategy , 1988 .

[33]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Improving Peers' Helping Behavior to Students with Learning Disabilities during Mathematics Peer Tutoring , 1996 .

[34]  Ita G. G. Kreft,et al.  Multilevel Analysis Methods , 1994 .

[35]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Enhancing Students' Helping Behavior during Peer-Mediated Instruction with Conceptual Mathematical Explanations , 1997, The Elementary School Journal.

[36]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies: Making Classrooms More Responsive to Diversity , 1997 .

[37]  M. Wittrock.  Handbook of research on teaching , 1986 .

[38]  Lev Vygotsky.  Mind in society , 1978 .

[39]  Marissa Echevarria,et al.  Literacy Instruction in 10 Fourth-Grade Classrooms in Upstate New York , 1998 .

[40]  Charles R. Greenwood,et al.  ClassWide Peer Tutoring and the Prevention of School Failure , 1995 .

[41]  C. Teddlie,et al.  The International Handbook of School Effectiveness Research , 1999 .

[42]  Paul van den Broek,et al.  Reading for Meaning: Fostering Comprehension in the Middle Grades. Language and Literacy Series. , 1999 .

[43]  D P MacKinnon,et al.  Multilevel Mediation Modeling in Group-Based Intervention Studies , 1999, Evaluation review.

[44]  Vincent Yzerbyt,et al.  From Social Cognition to Metacognition , 1998 .

[45]  Hope J. Hartman.  Developing Students’ Metacognitive Knowledge and Skills , 2001 .

[46]  Deborah C. Simmons.  Importance of Instructional Complexity and Role Reciprocity to Classwide Peer Tutoring. , 1994 .

[47]  C. Juel.  Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. , 1988 .

[48]  K. Topping.  The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature , 1996 .

[49]  E. Tanenbaum,et al.  Research Strategies in the Social Sciences , 1998 .

[50]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  The Efficacy of Peer Tutoring in Reading for Students with Disabilities: A Best-Evidence Synthesis. , 1991 .

[51]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  Becoming a skilled reader , 1988 .

[52]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Educational Outcomes of Tutoring: A Meta-analysis of Findings , 1982 .

[53]  Gerald G. Duffy,et al.  Effects of Explaining the Reasoning Associated with Using Reading Strategies. , 1987 .

[54]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[55]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Effects of Explicit Teaching and Peer Tutoring on the Reading Achievement of Learning-Disabled and Low-Performing Students in Regular Classrooms , 1995, The Elementary School Journal.

[56]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Strategies That Improve Children's Memory and Comprehension of Text , 1989, The Elementary School Journal.

[57]  Angela M. O'Donnell,et al.  Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning , 1999 .

[58]  Lauren R. Heller,et al.  Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment: A component analysis. , 1992 .

[59]  Hope J. Hartman.  Metacognition in Learning and Instruction , 2001 .

[60]  J. Fantuzzo,et al.  Effects of Parent Involvement in Isolation or in Combination with Peer Tutoring on Student Self-Concept and Mathematics Achievement. , 1995 .

[61]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Collaborative Strategic Reading during Social Studies in Heterogeneous Fourth-Grade Classrooms , 1998, The Elementary School Journal.

[62]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  Improving Text Comprehension Strategies in Reading and Listening Settings. , 1998 .

[63]  John W. Fantuzzo,et al.  An evaluation of reciprocal peer tutoring across elementary school settings , 1990 .

[64]  J. Fantuzzo,et al.  Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on academic achievement and psychological adjustment: A component analysis. , 1989 .