Maize Leaves Turn Away from Neighbors1

In commercial crops, maize (Zea mays) plants are typically grown at a larger distance between rows (70 cm) than within the same row (16–23 cm). This rectangular arrangement creates a heterogeneous environment in which the plants receive higher red light (R) to far-red light (FR) ratios from the interrow spaces. In field crops, the hybrid Dekalb 696 (DK696) showed an increased proportion of leaves toward interrow spaces, whereas the experimental hybrid 980 (Exp980) retained random leaf orientation. Mirrors reflecting FR were placed close to isolated plants to simulate the presence of neighbors in the field. In addition, localized FR was applied to target leaves in a growth chamber. During their expansion, the leaves of DK696 turned away from the low R to FR ratio signals, whereas Exp980 leaves remained unaffected. On the contrary, tillering was reduced and plant height was increased by low R to FR ratios in Exp980 but not in DK696. Isolated plants preconditioned with low R/FR-simulating neighbors in a North-South row showed reduced mutual shading among leaves when the plants were actually grouped in North-South rows. These observations contradict the current view that phytochrome-mediated responses to low R/FR are a relic from wild conditions, detrimental for crop yield.

[1]  Claudio M. Ghersa,et al.  Early detection of neighbour plants by phytochrome perception of spectral changes in reflected sunlight , 1987 .

[2]  P. Girardin,et al.  Leaf azimuth in maize canopies , 1992 .

[3]  Harry Smith,et al.  Reflection signals and the perception by phytochrome of the proximity of neighbouring vegetation , 1990 .

[4]  B. Andrieu,et al.  Simulation of light interception from a maize canopy model constructed by stereo plotting , 1995 .

[5]  P. Quail,et al.  Heterologous expression of Arabidopsis phytochrome B in transgenic potato influences photosynthetic performance and tuber development. , 1999, Plant physiology.

[6]  J. Casal,et al.  Tillering Responses of Lolium multiflorum Plants to Changes of Red/Far-Red Ratio Typical of Sparse Canopies , 1987 .

[7]  M. Trlica,et al.  Tillering responses to enrichment of red light beneath the canopy in a humid natural grassland , 1985 .

[8]  R. Sharrock,et al.  Phytochrome D acts in the shade-avoidance syndrome in Arabidopsis by controlling elongation growth and flowering time. , 1999, Plant physiology.

[9]  W. A. Brun,et al.  Light and Shade Effects on Abscission and C-Photoassimilate Partitioning among Reproductive Structures in Soybean. , 1983, Plant physiology.

[10]  I. Sartorato,et al.  Light quality beneath field‐grown maize, soybean and wheat canopies – red:far red variations , 1994 .

[11]  R. Satter,et al.  Photomorphogenesis in Sinningia speciosa, cv. Queen Victoria II. Stem Elongation: Interaction of a Phytochrome Controlled Process and a Red-requiring, Energy Dependent Reaction. , 1968, Plant physiology.

[12]  J. Casal,et al.  Effects of Light Quality on Tiller Production in Lolium spp. , 1983, Plant physiology.

[13]  S. Simmons,et al.  Modulation of leaf elongation, tiller appearance and tiller senescence in spring barley by far‐red light , 1993 .

[14]  Harry Smith,et al.  Establishment of far‐red high irradiance responses in wheat through transgenic expression of an oat phytochrome A gene , 2001 .

[15]  R. W. Willey,et al.  The Quantitative Relationships Between Plant Population And Crop Yield , 1969 .

[16]  L. M. Dwyer,et al.  Mathematical characterization of maize canopies , 1993 .

[17]  Joe E. Toler,et al.  Corn Leaf Orientation Effects on Light Interception, Intraspecific Competition, and Grain Yields , 1999 .

[18]  Harry Smith,et al.  Light Quality, Photoperception, and Plant Strategy , 1982 .

[19]  M. Yanovsky,et al.  Phytochrome A, phytochrome B and HY4 are involved in hypocotyl growth responses to natural radiation in Arabidopsis: weak de‐etiolation of the phyA mutant under dense canopies , 1995 .

[20]  P. Quail,et al.  Structure and expression of a maize phytochrome-encoding gene. , 1989, Gene.

[21]  M. Otegui,et al.  Plant population density, row spacing and hybrid effects on maize canopy architecture and light attenuation , 2001 .

[22]  G. Whitelam,et al.  Phytochrome E Influences Internode Elongation and Flowering Time in Arabidopsis , 1998, Plant Cell.

[23]  Matthijs Tollenaar,et al.  Effects of intraspecific interference on maize leaf azimuth , 1994 .

[24]  J C Watson,et al.  The Phototropin Family of Photoreceptors , 2001, Plant Cell.

[25]  Pratt,et al.  A photoperiod-insensitive barley line contains a light-labile phytochrome B , 1999, Plant physiology.

[26]  C. Ballaré,et al.  Light signals perceived by crop and weed plants. , 2000 .

[27]  Mutations in the gene for the red/far-red light receptor phytochrome B alter cell elongation and physiological responses throughout Arabidopsis development. , 1993, The Plant cell.

[28]  J. Mullet,et al.  The Sorghum Photoperiod Sensitivity Gene, Ma3, Encodes a Phytochrome B , 1997, Plant physiology.

[29]  J. Casal,et al.  Low Red to Far‐Red Ratios Reaching the Stem Reduce Grain Yield in Sunflower , 2002 .

[30]  Harry Smith,et al.  Genetic engineering of harvest index in tobacco through overexpression of a phytochrome gene , 1996, Nature Biotechnology.

[31]  Ana L. Scopel,et al.  Far-Red Radiation Reflected from Adjacent Leaves: An Early Signal of Competition in Plant Canopies , 1990, Science.

[32]  J. Casal,et al.  The effect of plant density on tillering: The involvement of R/FR ratio and the proportion of radiation intercepted per plant , 1986 .

[33]  J. Casal.  Environmental cues affecting development. , 2002, Current opinion in plant biology.

[34]  Masaki Furuya,et al.  Isolation and Characterization of Rice Phytochrome A Mutants , 2001, Plant Cell.

[35]  Joe T. Ritchie,et al.  Temperature and Crop Development , 1991 .

[36]  K. Thimann.  PHOTOTROPISM * , 1964 .

[37]  J. Casal.  Light quality effects on the appearance of tillers of different order in wheat (Triticum aestivum) , 1988 .

[38]  R. Vierstra,et al.  High-irradiance responses induced by far-red light in grass seedlings of the wild type or overexpressing phytochrome A , 1996, Planta.

[39]  K. Shimamoto,et al.  Phytochromes confer the photoperiodic control of flowering in rice (a short-day plant). , 1999, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[40]  F. P. Gardner,et al.  Responses of Maize to Plant Population Density. I. Canopy Development, Light Relationships, and Vegetative Growth , 1988 .

[41]  M. L. Roush,et al.  How plants find light in patchy canopies. A comparison between wild-type and phytochrome-B-deficient mutant plants of cucumber , 1995 .

[42]  M. Haidar,et al.  Smallseed Dodder (Cuscuta planiflora) Phototropism toward Far-red When in White Light , 1996, Weed Science.

[43]  B. Andrieu,et al.  Light interception of contrasting azimuth canopies under square and rectangular plant spatial distributions: simulations and crop measurements , 2001 .

[44]  Harry Smith.  Evidence that Pfr is not the active form of phytochrome in light-grown maize , 1981, Nature.

[45]  D. Karlen,et al.  Plant Spacing and Reflected Far‐Red Light Effects on Phytochrome‐Regulated Photosynthate Allocation in Corn Seedlings , 1994 .

[46]  S. Mathews,et al.  Phytochrome gene diversity , 1997 .

[47]  D. Karlen,et al.  Light-mediated bioregulation of tillering and photosynthate partitioning in wheat , 1986 .

[48]  V. Sadras,et al.  Effects of End-of-Day Red/Far-Red Ratio on Growth and Orientation of Sunflower Leaves , 1987, Botanical Gazette.

[49]  Harry Smith,et al.  Phytochromes and light signal perception by plants—an emerging synthesis , 2000, Nature.

[50]  J. Casal,et al.  The significance of changes in the red/far-red ratio, associated with either neighbour plants or twilight, for tillering in Lolium multiflorum Lam. , 1990 .