Validation of exposure assessment and assessment of recruitment methods for a prospective cohort study of mobile phone users (COSMOS) in Finland: a pilot study

BackgroundThe aim of the study was to evaluate the agreement between self-reported and operator-derived estimates of call time based on a three-month monitoring period, as well as the consistency of mobile phone use over time. Alternative approaches to improve participation in a cohort study of mobile phone users were also compared.MethodsA total of 5,400 subjects were identified from network operators' subscriber databases for recruitment to the pilot study. Operator and questionnaire data were used to quantify mobile phone use. Operator data were available for a subset of the subjects for a three-month period in three consecutive years. We also evaluated the effect of the length of the questionnaire and one- or two-phase recruitment on participation.ResultsThe average response rate for both questionnaires and recruitment procedures was 12%. The response rate was not affected by the length of the questionnaire or the recruitment method.Operator data were available for 83% of the participants for 2007, the first study year. The agreement between self-reported and operator-derived call times decreased with the level of use among intermediate and heavy mobile phone users. During 2007-2009, mobile phone use increased fairly constantly over time.ConclusionsThe agreement between self-reported mobile phone use and operator databases was moderate and overestimation of the call time by participants was common. A prospective cohort study would be feasible in Finland, although the potentially low participation rate would increase the resources required for recruitment.

[1]  Muhammad Mujahid Khan,et al.  Adverse effects of excessive mobile phone use. , 2008, International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health.

[2]  Consultations in primary care for symptoms attributed to electromagnetic fields – a survey among general practitioners , 2006, BMC public health.

[3]  O. Gandhi,et al.  Identification of Research Needs Relating to Potential Biological or Adverse Health Effects of Wireless Communication , 2008 .

[4]  Mona Shum,et al.  Factors that Influence the Radiofrequency Power Output of GSM Mobile Phones , 2007, Radiation research.

[5]  Leeka Kheifets,et al.  Epidemiologic Evidence on Mobile Phones and Tumor Risk: A Review , 2009, Epidemiology.

[6]  Kari Tokola,et al.  Reducing overestimation in reported mobile phone use associated with epidemiological studies , 2008, Bioelectromagnetics.

[7]  J. Morrissey Radio frequency exposure in mobile phone users: implications for exposure assessment in epidemiological studies. , 2007, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[8]  F. Farahat,et al.  Neurobehavioral effects among inhabitants around mobile phone base stations. , 2007, Neurotoxicology.

[9]  M. Dewhirst,et al.  Summary, conclusions and recommendations: adverse temperature levels in the human body , 2003, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[10]  M. Sandström,et al.  Mobile phone use and subjective symptoms. Comparison of symptoms experienced by users of analogue and digital mobile phones. , 2001, Occupational medicine.

[11]  Peter Kan,et al.  Cellular phone use and brain tumor: a meta-analysis , 2007, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[12]  Kari Tokola,et al.  Meta-analysis of mobile phone use and intracranial tumors. , 2006, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[13]  M. Clarke,et al.  Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  Maria Blettner,et al.  Assessment of radiofrequency exposure from cellular telephone daily use in an epidemiological study: German Validation study of the international case–control study of cancers of the brain—INTERPHONE-Study , 2005, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[15]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  An international prospective cohort study of mobile phone users and health (Cosmos): design considerations and enrolment. , 2011, Cancer epidemiology.

[16]  Paul Elliott,et al.  Call-related factors influencing output power from mobile phones , 2006, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[17]  John D Boice,et al.  Cellular telephone use and cancer risk: update of a nationwide Danish cohort. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  M. Vrijheid,et al.  Quantifying the impact of selection bias caused by nonparticipation in a case-control study of mobile phone use. , 2009, Annals of epidemiology.

[19]  K J Rothman,et al.  Cause-specific mortality in cellular telephone users. , 1999, JAMA.

[20]  Maria Blettner,et al.  Validation of self-reported cellular phone use , 2004, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[21]  C. Vionnet [Environmental health]. , 1983, Krankenpflege. Soins infirmiers.

[22]  Anssi Auvinen,et al.  Brain Tumors and Salivary Gland Cancers Among Cellular Telephone Users , 2002, Epidemiology.

[23]  M. Röösli Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and non-specific symptoms of ill health: a systematic review. , 2008, Environmental research.

[24]  N. Dreyer,et al.  Utility of telephone company records for epidemiologic studies of cellular telephones. , 1996, Epidemiology.

[25]  M Feychting,et al.  Output power levels from mobile phones in different geographical areas; implications for exposure assessment , 2004, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[26]  Daniel Krewski,et al.  The effects of recall errors and of selection bias in epidemiologic studies of mobile phone use and cancer risk , 2006, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[27]  E Cardis,et al.  Validation of short term recall of mobile phone use for the Interphone study , 2006, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[28]  S J Hepworth,et al.  Recall of past use of mobile phone handsets. , 2003, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[29]  Anssi Auvinen,et al.  Selection bias due to differential participation in a case-control study of mobile phone use and brain tumors. , 2005, Annals of epidemiology.

[30]  Paolo Vecchia,et al.  Determinants of exposure to electromagnetic fields from mobile phones. , 2004, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[31]  M. Clarke,et al.  Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[32]  S. Chia,et al.  Prevalence of headache among handheld cellular telephone users in Singapore: a community study. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[33]  M Kundi,et al.  Subjective symptoms, sleeping problems, and cognitive performance in subjects living near mobile phone base stations , 2006, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.