Flight simulator evaluation of an integrated synthetic and enhanced vision system for terrain avoidance

This paper describes a flight simulator study that was conducted during 2004 and 2005 at the Operator Performance Laboratory (OPL) at the University of Iowa. This particular study focused on low-level terrain following and terrain avoidance (TF/TA) missions as they may apply to special operation forces flying aircraft such as the MC-130H Talon II. Ten military pilots who were familiar with those types of mission profiles participated in this study. They each flew four training sorties and eight data collection sorties. The variables of interest included the use of a head-up display (HUD, with/without), the use of forward looking infrared (FLIR, with/without), the use of synthetic vision terrain (with/without), and the use of a guidance pathway vs. a flight director (FD). The missions were flown at an altitude of 600 ft AGL and for a planned ground speed of 240 kts. These parameters were chosen in line with the subsequent FAA William I Huges Technical Center's Boeing 727-100 flight tests that were flown in the Spring of 2005. The dependent variables included lateral and vertical flight technical errors (FTEs), workload scores (AFFTC/AWRES), and Situation Awareness Rating Technique (SART) scores.

[1]  Peter Hecker,et al.  Increasing the Aircrew's Situation Awareness by Enhanced and Synthetic Vision , 2003 .

[2]  Anthony P. Bartolone,et al.  Initial development of a metric to describe the level of safety associated with piloting an aircraft with synthetic vision systems (SVS) displays , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[3]  G.J.M. Koeners,et al.  Integration of imaging sensor data into a synthetic vision display , 2004, The 23rd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37576).

[4]  J. Raymond Comstock,et al.  Can Effective Synthetic Vision System Displays be Implemented on Limited Size Display Spaces , 2004 .

[5]  Erik Theunissen,et al.  An exocentric SGS display format: design and evaluation , 2003, Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2003. DASC '03. The 22nd.

[6]  G.J.M. Koeners,et al.  Integrating routing in surface guidance displays , 2004, The 23rd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37576).

[7]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Pathway HUDs: Are They Viable? , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[8]  Gary L. Serfoss,et al.  Altitude Cuing Effectiveness of Terrain Texture Characteristics in Simulated Low-Altitude Flight. , 1995 .

[9]  James A. Kleiss,et al.  Visual Scene Properties Relevant for Simulating Low-Altitude Flight: A Multidimensional Scaling Approach , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[10]  Michael P. Snow,et al.  EFFECT OF PATHWAY-IN-THE-SKY AND SYNTHETIC TERRAIN IMAGERY ON SITUATION AWARENESS IN A SIMULATED LOW-LEVEL INGRESS SCENARIO , 1999 .

[11]  M.U. de Haag,et al.  Assessment of radar altimeter performance when used for integrity monitoring in a synthetic vision system , 2001, 20th DASC. 20th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (Cat. No.01CH37219).

[12]  Maarten Uijt de Haag,et al.  DEM integrity monitor experiment (DIME) flight test results , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[13]  David C. Hubbard,et al.  Effect of Terrain Shape and Object Grouping on Perception of Change in Altitude in a Flight Simulator. , 1995 .