The Semantic Web from an Industry Perspective

Semantic Web technology is being increasingly applied in a large spectrum of applications in which domain knowledge is conceptualized and formalized (e.g., by means of an ontology) in order to support diversified and automated knowledge processing (e.g., reasoning) performed by a machine. Moreover, through an optimal combination of (cognitive) human reasoning and (automated) machine reasoning and processing, it is possible for humans and machines to share complementary tasks. The spectrum of applications is extremely large and to name a few: corporate portals and knowledge manage-ment, e-commerce, e-work, e-business, healthcare, e-government, natural language understanding and automated translation, information search, data and services integration, social networks and collaborative filtering, knowledge mining, business intelligence and so on. From a social and economic perspective, this emerging technology should contribute to growth in economic wealth, but it must also show clear cut value for everyday activities through technological transparency and efficiency. The penetration of Semantic Web technology in industry and in services is progressing slowly but accelerating as new success stories are reported. In this paper and lecture we present ongoing work in the cross-fertilization between industry and academia. In particular, we present a collection of application fields and use cases from enterprises which are interested in the promises of Semantic Web technology. The use cases are detailed and focused on the key knowledge processing components that will unlock the deployment of the technology in the selected application field. The paper ends with the presentation of the current technology roadmap designed by a team of Academic and Industry researchers.

[1]  Gio Wiederhold,et al.  Mediators in the architecture of future information systems , 1992, Computer.

[2]  Johannes Heinecke,et al.  Intelligent Human Language Query Processing in Mkbeem , 2003, HCI.

[3]  J. Charlet,et al.  Interopérabilité en médecine : quand le contenu interroge le contenant et l'organisation , 2002 .

[4]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  OntoSeek: content-based access to the Web , 1999, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[5]  Mohand-Said Hacid,et al.  Dynamic discovery of e-services A description logics based approach , 2002 .

[6]  Bernard Gibaud,et al.  Interoperability and Medical Communication Using "Patient Envelope"-Based Secure Messaging , 2003, MIE.

[7]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  Representing and querying data transformations , 2005, 21st International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'05).

[8]  Francesco M. Donini,et al.  Reasoning in description logics , 1997 .

[9]  A. T. Schreiber,et al.  Proceedings of the ISWC 2005 Workshop on Semantic Web Case Studies and Best Practices for eBusiness (SWCASE-2005), Galway, Ireland, November 7, 2005 , 2005 .

[10]  Fausto Giunchiglia,et al.  S-Match: an Algorithm and an Implementation of Semantic Matching , 2004, ESWS.

[11]  Hans Tompits,et al.  Reasoning Methods for Personalization on the Semantic Web , 2004 .

[12]  Steffen Staab,et al.  QOM - Quick Ontology Mapping , 2004, GI Jahrestagung.

[13]  Marco Pistore,et al.  Automated Composition of Semantic Web Services into Executable Processes , 2004, SEMWEB.

[14]  Ralf Küsters,et al.  Rewriting Concepts Using Terminologies , 2000, KR.

[15]  Yong Yu,et al.  Conceptual Graph Matching for Semantic Search , 2002, ICCS.

[16]  Louis Vuurpijl,et al.  Using Pen-Based Outlines for Object-Based Annotation and Image-Based Queries , 1999, VISUAL.

[17]  K. Wiig Knowledge management: Where did it come from and where will it go? , 1997 .

[18]  Stefan Böttcher,et al.  Match-Making based on Semantic Nets - The XML-based Approach of BaSeWep , 2002, XSW.

[19]  Uwe Reyle,et al.  From Discourse to Logic - Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory , 1993, Studies in linguistics and philosophy.

[20]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  An Environment for Merging and Testing Large Ontologies , 2000, KR.

[21]  Fausto Giunchiglia,et al.  Web Explanations for Semantic Heterogeneity Discovery , 2005, ESWC.

[22]  Tore Risch,et al.  Processing queries over RDF views of wrapped relational databases , 2004 .

[23]  James A. Hendler,et al.  The Semantic Web" in Scientific American , 2001 .

[24]  Uwe Reyle,et al.  From discourse to logic , 1993 .

[25]  Francesco M. Donini,et al.  A system for principled matchmaking in an electronic marketplace , 2003, WWW '03.

[26]  Jean-Michel Jolion,et al.  Face Recognition Using Modular Bilinear Discriminant Analysis , 2005, VISUAL.

[27]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching , 2001, The VLDB Journal.

[28]  Kurt Sandkuhl,et al.  Match-making based on semantic nets – The XML-based approach of BaSeWeP , 2002 .

[29]  Vipul Kashyap,et al.  Observer: an approach for query processing in global information systems based on interoperation across pre-existing ontologies , 1996, Proceedings First IFCIS International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems.

[30]  Jérôme Euzenat,et al.  Similarity-Based Ontology Alignment in OWL-Lite , 2004, ECAI.

[31]  Fausto Giunchiglia,et al.  Semantic Matching: Algorithms and Implementation , 2007, J. Data Semant..

[32]  Pedro M. Domingos,et al.  iMAP: discovering complex semantic matches between database schemas , 2004, SIGMOD '04.

[33]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  COMA - A System for Flexible Combination of Schema Matching Approaches , 2002, VLDB.

[34]  Dan Corbett,et al.  A Framework for Comparing the use of a Linguistic Ontology in an Application , 2000 .

[35]  Jérôme Euzenat,et al.  A Survey of Schema-Based Matching Approaches , 2005, J. Data Semant..

[36]  Marc Shapiro,et al.  Semantics-Based Reconciliation for Collaborative and Mobile Environments , 2003, OTM.

[37]  Peishen Qi,et al.  Ontology Translation on the Semantic Web , 2003, J. Data Semant..

[38]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[39]  Robert Meersman,et al.  On The Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2003: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[40]  Jeffrey M. Bradshaw,et al.  Applying KAoS Services to Ensure Policy Compliance for Semantic Web Services Workflow Composition and Enactment , 2004, SEMWEB.

[41]  Mohand-Said Hacid,et al.  Computing Concept Covers: a Preliminary Report , 2002, Description Logics.