Measuring Innovation Efficacy: An Operational Framework for Mapping and Measuring Innovation Capacity and Performance of Countries

In an increasingly globalised economy, the ability to draw in innovations and ideas from elsewhere and build on them to create value at home has become a powerful facility for economic growth. Since some places are better at adopting and adapting borrowed ideas than others, the process of ‘innovation through adoption’ deserves more attention at both scholarly and policymaking levels. Based on such beliefs, this paper elaborates the notion of ‘innovation adoption’ and develops it further to advance the notion of ‘innovation efficacy’. The latter is interpreted here as the efficiency and effectiveness of innovation systems in terms of accessing, anchoring, diffusing, creating and exploiting innovations. This notion is further illustrated in a measurement tool based on a composite index, which we name the ‘Innovation Efficacy Index’. The ultimate contribution of the paper lies in its aim to shift the traditional focus of attention from a fixation with developing and exploiting new knowledge locally to the prospect of value creation through accessing, anchoring or diffusing knowledge acquired from elsewhere.

[1]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  Complementarity in the Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D, External Technology Acquisition, and Cooperation in R&D , 2002 .

[2]  Charles Edquist,et al.  Systems of innovation perspectives and challenges , 2004 .

[3]  Sulekha Patel,et al.  World development indicators 2009 , 2009 .

[4]  P. Cooke,et al.  Constructing Regional Advantage: Platform Policies Based on Related Variety and Differentiated Knowledge Bases , 2011 .

[5]  R. Solow.  A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth , 1956 .

[6]  K. Kosonen,et al.  Local or Digital Buzz, Global or National Pipelines: Patterns of Knowledge Sourcing in Intelligent Machinery and Digital Content Services in Finland , 2011 .

[7]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  The technological capabilities of nations: the state of the art of synthetic indicators , 2009 .

[8]  M. Lessnoff.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1979 .

[9]  F. Gault,et al.  National Innovation, Indicators and Policy , 2006 .

[10]  Apresentação Paulo Bastos Tigre.  Bengt-Åke Lundvall - Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation , 2009 .

[11]  Markus Balzat,et al.  Benchmarking in the Context of National Innovation Systems: Purpose and Pitfalls , 2003 .

[12]  Juan Alcácer,et al.  Knowledge Seeking and Location Choice of Foreign Direct Investment in the United States , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[13]  R. Nelson,et al.  National Innovation Systems , 1993 .

[14]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct , 2006 .

[15]  S. Benita,et al.  Analysis for Policy: Evidence-Based Policy in Practice , 2007 .

[16]  J. Niosi.  National systems of innovations are “x-efficient” (and x-effective): Why some are slow learners , 2002 .

[17]  P. Benneworth,et al.  Strengthening Global-Local Connectivity in Regional Innovation Strategies: Implications for Regional Innovation Policy , 2011 .

[18]  鳥居 泰彦,et al.  世界経済・社会統計 = World development indicators , 1998 .

[19]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide , 2005 .

[20]  Andrew Chadwick,et al.  Path dependence and innovation in British city-regions , 2008 .

[21]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer , 2005 .

[22]  Kira Fabrizio.  Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation , 2009 .

[23]  Sami Mahroum.  Assessing human resources for science and technology: The 3Ds framework , 2007 .

[24]  Oliver Plum,et al.  On the Nature and Geography of Innovation and Interactive Learning: A Case Study of the Biotechnology Industry in the Aachen Technology Region, Germany , 2011 .

[25]  H. Grupp,et al.  Indicators for national science and technology policy: how robust are composite indicators? , 2004 .

[26]  Patel Parimal,et al.  National Innovation Systems: Why They Are Important, And How They Might Be Measured And Compared , 1994 .

[27]  장용석.  OECD Innovation Strategy , 2008 .

[28]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Exploration and exploitation in innovation systems: The case of pharmaceutical biotechnology , 2006 .

[29]  Bruce Tether,et al.  Beyond industry–university links: Sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public science-base , 2008 .

[30]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development , 2008 .

[31]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues , 2002 .

[32]  P. Romer.  Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[33]  Ben R. Martin,et al.  The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research , 1996, Scientometrics.

[34]  Other.  Human Development Report 2001: making new technologies work for human development , 2001 .

[35]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[36]  Sami Mahroum,et al.  The international policies of brain gain: A review , 2005, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[37]  Castellacci Fulvio,et al.  The dynamics of national innovation systems: a panel cointegration analysis of the coevolution between innovative capability and absorptive capacity , 2011 .

[38]  James E. Salzman,et al.  Environmental Law and Policy , 2002 .

[39]  C. Freeman.  Technology policy and economic performance : lessons from Japan , 1987 .

[40]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  A New Indicator of Technological Capabilities for Developed and Developing Countries (Arco) , 2004 .

[41]  Innovation by adoption: measuring and mapping absorptive capacity in UK nations and regions , 2008 .

[42]  S. Mani.  Government, Innovation and Technology Policy: An International Comparative Analysis , 2002 .

[43]  V. Rodriguez,et al.  ASEAN benchmarking in terms of science, technology, and innovation from 1999 to 2009 , 2012, Scientometrics.

[44]  B. Asheim,et al.  Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local ‘Sticky’ and Global ‘Ubiquitous’ Knowledge , 2002 .

[45]  K. Green.  National innovation systems: a comparative analysis , 1996 .

[46]  Yasser M. Al‐Saleh,et al.  Systems of innovations as a conceptual framework for studying the emergence of national renewable energy industries , 2010 .

[47]  H. Watts,et al.  The Determinants of Regional Sourcing by Multinational Manufacturing Firms: Evidence from Yorkshire and Humberside, UK , 2003 .

[48]  M. Nadiri,et al.  Innovations and Technological Spillovers , 1993 .

[49]  H. Grupp,et al.  Review and new evidence on composite innovation indicators for evaluating national performance , 2010 .

[50]  Réjean Landry,et al.  Dilemmas of Practice-Based Innovation Policy-Making , 2012 .

[51]  Andrew Burns,et al.  Technology diffusion in the developing world , 2009 .

[52]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  The Geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems , 2006 .

[53]  K. Sauvant.  World Investment Report , 1999 .

[54]  Colby Wright.  The Venturesome Economy , 2008 .

[55]  C. Edquist.  Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[56]  P. Oinas,et al.  The Evolution of Technologies in Time and Space: From National and Regional to Spatial Innovation Systems , 2002 .

[57]  Andrew Moffat.  Environmental Performance Index , 2014 .

[58]  I. Sanderson.  Evaluation, Policy Learning and Evidence-Based Policy Making , 2002 .