Participatory tensions in working with a vulnerable population

This note uncovers a design tension in participatory design practice in the context of two organizations in Nepal working on reducing sex-trafficking and helping survivors. The dilemma consists of contradictions between the public face that the organizations present to the world and the more complex underlying picture painted by survivors. In initial work, we created and deployed a value-elicitation game for survivors that gave us better access to their voices. However, the implications for ongoing participatory work remain to be unpacked. The veneer may constitute a necessary part of the staffs' successful interactions with external funders. The survivors rely on the resources that the organization gathers, yet the veneer may also obscure some aspects of the survivors' needs. The question raised is "how should our PD practice position itself with respect to the ideal of comprehensive democratic participation when potential harm may ensue to vulnerable people?"

[1]  Margot Brereton,et al.  New challenges for design participation in the era of ubiquitous computing , 2008 .

[2]  L. Alcoff The problem of speaking for others , 1991 .

[3]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Designing for homo ludens , 2002 .

[4]  Nina Laurie,et al.  Sexual trafficking in Nepal: constructing citizenship and livelihoods , 2009 .

[5]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  The Neighborhood Networks project: a case study of critical engagement and creative expression through participatory design , 2008, PDC.

[6]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation , 2006, DIS '06.

[7]  Andrew M. Dearden,et al.  See no evil?: ethics in an interventionist ICTD , 2012, ICTD.

[8]  Gary Marsden,et al.  Beyond being a proxy user: a look at NGOs‘ potential role in ICT4D deployment , 2010 .

[9]  J. Spradley The Ethnographic Interview , 1979 .

[10]  S. Huda,et al.  Sex trafficking in South Asia , 2006, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[11]  Morten Kyng,et al.  On creating and sustaining alternatives: the case of Danish telehealth , 2015, Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives.

[12]  Eva Brandt,et al.  Designing exploratory design games: a framework for participation in Participatory Design? , 2006, PDC '06.

[13]  Alnoor Ebrahim Accountability In Practice: Mechanisms for NGOs , 2003 .

[14]  Tone Bratteteig,et al.  Disentangling power and decision-making in participatory design , 2012, PDC '12.

[15]  Nicola J. Bidwell,et al.  Community Consensus: Design Beyond Participation , 2012, Design Issues.

[16]  Dianna L. Hardy,et al.  Dilemmas in situating participation in rural ways of saying , 2009, OZCHI '09.

[17]  D. Roodman,et al.  The Anarchy of Numbers: Aid, Development, and Cross-Country Empirics , 2003 .

[18]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[19]  Mary Crawford,et al.  Research and Activism Review: Sex Trafficking in Nepal: A Review of Intervention and Prevention Programs , 2011, Violence against women.

[20]  Jörn Messeter,et al.  Facilitating collaboration through design games , 2004, PDC 04.

[21]  Carlo Franzato,et al.  The influence of local powers on participatory design processes in marginalized conflict areas , 2014, PDC.

[22]  Hristos Doucouliagos,et al.  Aid Effectiveness on Growth. A Meta Study , 2008 .

[23]  Brendan Walker,et al.  Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty , 2004, INTR.

[24]  V. Heinrich,et al.  The Role of NGOs in Strengthening the Foundations of South African Democracy , 2001 .

[25]  Deborah G. Tatar,et al.  The Design Tensions Framework , 2007, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[26]  Jörn Messeter,et al.  Negotiation of values as driver in community-based PD , 2016, PDC.

[27]  Tone Bratteteig,et al.  Disentangling Participation: Power and Decision-making in Participatory Design , 2014 .