Multilevel Alignment Maintains Language systematicity

The question how a shared vocabulary can arise in a multi-agent population despite the fact that each agent autonomously invents and acquires words has been solved. The solution is based on alignment: Agents score all associations between words and meanings in their lexicons and update these preference scores based on communicative success. A positive feedback loop between success and use thus arises which causes the spontaneous self-organization of a shared lexicon. The same approach has been proposed for explaining how a population can arrive at a shared grammar, in which we get the same problem of variation because each agent invents and acquires their own grammatical constructions. However, a problem arises if constructions reuse parts that can also exist on their own. This happens particularly when frequent usage patterns, which are based on compositional rules, are stored as such. The problem is how to maintain systematicity. This paper identifies this problem and proposes a solution in the form of multilevel alignment. Multilevel alignment means that the updating of preference scores is not restricted to the constructions that were used in the utterance but also downward and upward in the subsumption hierarchy.

[1]  Andrej Malchukov "Quirky case": rare phonomena in case-marking and their implications for a theory of typological distributions , 2010 .

[2]  William Labov,et al.  6. Problems in the Analysis of Idioms , 1980 .

[3]  K. Tuyls,et al.  How to reach linguistic consensus: a proof of convergence for the naming game. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  Michael Barlow,et al.  Usage-based models of language , 2000 .

[5]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  Journal of Statistical Mechanics: An IOP and SISSA journal Theory and Experiment Sharp transition towardsshared vocabularies in multi-agent systems , 2006 .

[6]  Koenraad Kuiper Smooth Talkers: The Linguistic Performance of Auctioneers and Sportscasters , 1995 .

[7]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  A cross-situational learning algorithm for damping homonymy in the guessing game , 2006 .

[8]  S. Garrod,et al.  Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination , 1987, Cognition.

[9]  Luc Steels A self-organizing spatial vocabulary , 1995 .

[10]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Alignment as the Basis for Successful Communication , 2006 .

[11]  John Sinclair,et al.  Corpus, Concordance, Collocation , 1991 .

[12]  C. Westbury,et al.  Processing Advantages of Lexical Bundles: Evidence from Self-Paced Reading and Sentence Recall Tasks. , 2011 .

[13]  Luc Steels,et al.  A Perceptual System for Language Game Experiments , 2012, Language Grounding in Robots.

[14]  G. Leech Grammars of spoken English: new outcomes of corpus-oriented research. , 2000 .

[15]  Remi van Trijp THE EMERGENCE OF SEMANTIC ROLES IN FLUID CONSTRUCTION GRAMMAR , 2008 .