Making Sense of Bell’s Theorem and Quantum Nonlocality

Bell’s theorem has fascinated physicists and philosophers since his 1964 paper, which was written in response to the 1935 paper of Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen. Bell’s theorem and its many extensions have led to the claim that quantum mechanics and by inference nature herself are nonlocal in the sense that a measurement on a system by an observer at one location has an immediate effect on a distant entangled system (one with which the original system has previously interacted). Einstein was repulsed by such “spooky action at a distance” and was led to question whether quantum mechanics could provide a complete description of physical reality. In this paper I argue that quantum mechanics does not require spooky action at a distance of any kind and yet it is entirely reasonable to question the assumption that quantum mechanics can provide a complete description of physical reality. The magic of entangled quantum states has little to do with entanglement and everything to do with superposition, a property of all quantum systems and a foundational tenet of quantum mechanics.

[1]  D. Bohm.  A SUGGESTED INTERPRETATION OF THE QUANTUM THEORY IN TERMS OF "HIDDEN" VARIABLES. II , 1952 .

[2]  J. Bell.  BERTLMANN'S SOCKS AND THE NATURE OF REALITY , 1981 .

[3]  D. Bohm,et al.  Discussion of Experimental Proof for the Paradox of Einstein, Rosen, and Podolsky , 1957 .

[4]  Albert Einstein,et al.  Physics and reality , 1936 .

[5]  W. H. Furry.  Remarks on Measurements in Quantum Theory , 1936 .

[6]  W. H. Furry.  Note on the Quantum-Mechanical Theory of Measurement , 1936 .

[7]  J. Bell,et al.  The Theory of Local Beables , 1975 .

[8]  D. Albert.  Quantum Mechanics and Experience , 1992 .

[9]  Bas C. Van Fraassen,et al.  The Charybdis of realism: Epistemological implications of bell's inequality , 1982, Synthese.

[10]  Tim Maudlin,et al.  Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity: Metaphysical Intimations of Modern Physics, Second Edition , 2002 .

[11]  H. Stapp.  Bell's theorem and world process , 1975 .

[12]  Amit Goswami,et al.  The Copenhagen Interpretation , 2001 .

[13]  L. Loeb.  Autobiographical Notes , 2015, Perspectives in biology and medicine.

[14]  R. Mcweeny.  On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox , 2000 .

[15]  A Modest View of Bell's Theorem , 2016, 1604.08529.

[16]  Matison,et al.  Experimental Test of Local Hidden-Variable Theories , 1972 .

[17]  N. Mermin.  Hidden variables and the two theorems of John Bell , 1993, 1802.10119.

[18]  N. David Mermin,et al.  Is the Moon There When Nobody Looks? Reality and the Quantum Theory , 1985 .

[19]  H. Wiseman.  From Einstein's theorem to Bell's theorem: a history of quantum non-locality , 2005, quant-ph/0509061.

[20]  J. Bell.  On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics , 1966 .

[21]  Leslie E Ballentine,et al.  The statistical interpretation of quantum mechanics , 1970 .

[22]  Travis Norsen,et al.  Bell's theorem , 2011, Scholarpedia.

[23]  Arthur Fine.  Do correlations need to be explained , 1989 .

[24]  D. Howard.  Revisiting the Einstein-Bohr Dialogue , 2006 .

[25]  Albert Einstein,et al.  Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? , 1935 .