Autoantibody signatures as biomarkers to distinguish prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients with increased serum prostate specific antigen.

BACKGROUND Serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentrations lack the specificity to differentiate prostate cancer from benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), resulting in unnecessary biopsies. We identified 5 autoantibody signatures to specific cancer targets which might be able to differentiate prostate cancer from BPH in patients with increased serum PSA. METHODS To identify autoantibody signatures as biomarkers, a native antigen reverse capture microarray platform was used. Briefly, well-characterized monoclonal antibodies were arrayed onto nanoparticle slides to capture native antigens from prostate cancer cells. Prostate cancer patient serum samples (n=41) and BPH patient samples (collected starting at the time of initial diagnosis) with a mean follow-up of 6.56 y without the diagnosis of cancer (n=39) were obtained. One hundred micrograms of IgGs were purified and labeled with a Cy3 dye and incubated on the arrays. The arrays were scanned for fluorescence and the intensity was quantified. Receiver operating characteristic curves were produced and the area under the curve (AUC) was determined. RESULTS Using our microarray platform, we identified autoantibody signatures capable of distinguishing between prostate cancer and BPH. The top 5 autoantibody signatures were TARDBP, TLN1, PARK7, LEDGF/PSIP1, and CALD1. Combining these signatures resulted in an AUC of 0.95 (sensitivity of 95% at 80% specificity) compared to AUC of 0.5 for serum concentration PSA (sensitivity of 12.2% at 80% specificity). CONCLUSION Our preliminary results showed that we were able to identify specific autoantibody signatures that can differentiate prostate cancer from BPH, and may result in the reduction of unnecessary biopsies in patients with increased serum PSA.

[1]  Jian-ying Zhang Tumor-associated antigen arrays to enhance antibody detection for cancer diagnosis. , 2004, Cancer detection and prevention.

[2]  Joshua R. Ehrlich,et al.  A native antigen “reverse capture” microarray platform for autoantibody profiling of prostate cancer sera , 2007, PROTEOMICS - Clinical Applications.

[3]  T. Dörk,et al.  Nuclear factor TDP‐43 and SR proteins promote in vitro and in vivo CFTR exon 9 skipping , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[4]  Weiliang Qiu,et al.  Development of a “reverse capture” autoantibody microarray for studies of antigen‐autoantibody profiling , 2006, Proteomics.

[5]  Rajiv Dhir,et al.  Talin1 promotes tumor invasion and metastasis via focal adhesion signaling and anoikis resistance. , 2010, Cancer research.

[6]  J. Kros,et al.  Differential expression of Hela‐type caldesmon in tumour neovascularization: a new marker of angiogenic endothelial cells , 2005, The Journal of pathology.

[7]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2011 , 2011, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[8]  R. Nussenblatt,et al.  Antinuclear autoantibodies in uveitis. , 1989, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[9]  T. Niki,et al.  DJBP: a novel DJ-1-binding protein, negatively regulates the androgen receptor by recruiting histone deacetylase complex, and DJ-1 antagonizes this inhibition by abrogation of this complex. , 2003, Molecular cancer research : MCR.

[10]  E. Tan,et al.  Tumor-associated Antigen Arrays for the Serological Diagnosis of Cancer* , 2006, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[11]  T. Morita,et al.  Caldesmon suppresses cancer cell invasion by regulating podosome/invadopodium formation , 2007 .

[12]  Joshua LaBaer,et al.  The sentinel within: exploiting the immune system for cancer biomarkers. , 2005, Journal of proteome research.

[13]  Tom Misteli,et al.  TDP-43 regulates retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation through the repression of cyclin-dependent kinase 6 expression , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Alan W Partin,et al.  PSA markers in prostate cancer detection. , 2003, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[15]  M. Brawer,et al.  Prostate‐specific antigen: Current status , 1999, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[16]  Jianjun Yu,et al.  Humoral Response Profiling Reveals Pathways to Prostate Cancer Progression*S , 2008, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[17]  T. Daniels,et al.  Antinuclear autoantibodies in prostate cancer: Immunity to LEDGF/p75, a survival protein highly expressed in prostate tumors and cleaved during apoptosis , 2005, The Prostate.

[18]  Joshua R. Ehrlich,et al.  The 'reverse capture' autoantibody microarray:a native antigen-based platform for autoantibody profiling , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[19]  J. Koziol,et al.  Enhancement of antibody detection in cancer using panel of recombinant tumor-associated antigens. , 2003, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[20]  Jianjun Yu,et al.  Autoantibody Signatures in Prostate Cancer , 2006 .

[21]  O. Finn,et al.  Immune response as a biomarker for cancer detection and a lot more. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  S. Nilsson,et al.  Prostasome‐derived proteins capable of eliciting an immune response in prostate cancer patients , 2006, International journal of cancer.