Wavefield decomposition using ML-probabilities in modelling single-site 3-component records

SUMMARY This paper presents a new approach to the analysis of three-component digital seismograms. Earlier approaches used techniques such as Principal Components to estimate particlemotion using models of P and S waves. In this paper the Maximum-Likelihood (ML) estimator is preferred because this allows the use of X2-probabilities to test whether energy of a specific wave type (P, S, Love or Rayleigh) is present. In addition, this analysis allows the joint estimation of azimuth of approach and in cases of P- and SV-waves also apparent angle of incidence (and, hence, information on apparent velocity). For a single three-component seismogram, the covariance matrix provides only six independent observations, thus restricting analysis to rather simple wave models. The technique works satisfactorily for P-waves whereas shear and surface-wave models sometimes prove cumbersome to handle due to correlation between radial and transverse components reflecting complex propagation characteristics in inhomogeneous media. This technique has been tested on synthetic data and in such cases works perfectly for all wave types. An important aspect of this work has been the visual display of the probability and velocity information as functions of time and azimuth. Displaying the data in this form provides information on the ray path in a manner similar to analysis performed by seismic arrays. Practical examples on a variety of siesmic data are given to illustrate the viability of the technique: the data cover a broad spectrum of frequencies and applications from broad-band teleseismic data (1 Hz), regional seismic data (10-40 Hz), seismic profiling data (125 Hz) and VSP (500 Hz) recordings.

[1]  S. Hodge,et al.  Statistics and Probability , 1972 .

[2]  E. I. Gal'perin,et al.  The Polarization Method of Seismic Exploration , 1983 .

[3]  Paul G. Richards,et al.  Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods , 1980 .

[4]  E. S. Husebye,et al.  Event location at any distance using seismic data from a single, three-component station , 1988 .

[5]  Keiiti Aki,et al.  Discrete wave-number representation of seismic-source wave fields , 1977, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[6]  R. T. Lacoss,et al.  ESTIMATION OF SEISMIC NOISE STRUCTURE USING ARRAYS , 1969 .

[7]  John E. Vidale,et al.  Complex polarization analysis of particle motion , 1986 .

[8]  David M. Boore,et al.  Rayleigh wave particle motion and crustal structure , 1969 .

[9]  C. Langston,et al.  The validity of ray theory approximations for the computation of teleseismic SV waves , 1985 .

[10]  Herman Rubin,et al.  Statistical Inference in Factor Analysis , 1956 .

[11]  E. S. Husebye,et al.  Regional arrays and optimum data processing schemes , 1985 .

[12]  J. Samson,et al.  On the detection of the polarization states of Pc micropulsations , 1979 .

[13]  K. E. Bullen,et al.  An Introduction to the Theory of Seismology , 1964 .

[14]  E. A. Flinn Signal analysis using rectilinearity and direction of particle motion , 1965 .

[15]  J. Capon Signal Processing and Frequency-Wavenumber Spectrum Analysis for a Large Aperture Seismic Array* , 1973 .

[16]  M. Bouchon A simple method to calculate Green's functions for elastic layered media , 1981 .

[17]  Michael Shimshoni,et al.  SEISMIC SIGNAL ENHANCEMENT WITH THREE‐COMPONENT DETECTORS , 1964 .

[18]  David C. Booth,et al.  Shear-wave polarizations on a curved wavefront at an isotropic free surface , 1985 .

[19]  B. Kennett Guided wave propagation in laterally varying media — I. Theoretical development , 1984 .

[20]  Ernest R. Kanasewich,et al.  Enhancement of Teleseismic Body Phases with a Polarization Filter , 1970 .

[21]  J. C. Samson,et al.  Pure states, polarized waves, and principal components in the spectra of multiple, geophysical time-series , 1983 .