OpenBiodiv-O: ontology of the OpenBiodiv knowledge management system

BackgroundThe biodiversity domain, and in particular biological taxonomy, is moving in the direction of semantization of its research outputs. The present work introduces OpenBiodiv-O, the ontology that serves as the basis of the OpenBiodiv Knowledge Management System. Our intent is to provide an ontology that fills the gaps between ontologies for biodiversity resources, such as DarwinCore-based ontologies, and semantic publishing ontologies, such as the SPAR Ontologies. We bridge this gap by providing an ontology focusing on biological taxonomy.ResultsOpenBiodiv-O introduces classes, properties, and axioms in the domains of scholarly biodiversity publishing and biological taxonomy and aligns them with several important domain ontologies (FaBiO, DoCO, DwC, Darwin-SW, NOMEN, ENVO). By doing so, it bridges the ontological gap across scholarly biodiversity publishing and biological taxonomy and allows for the creation of a Linked Open Dataset (LOD) of biodiversity information (a biodiversity knowledge graph) and enables the creation of the OpenBiodiv Knowledge Management System.A key feature of the ontology is that it is an ontology of the scientific process of biological taxonomy and not of any particular state of knowledge. This feature allows it to express a multiplicity of scientific opinions. The resulting OpenBiodiv knowledge system may gain a high level of trust in the scientific community as it does not force a scientific opinion on its users (e.g. practicing taxonomists, library researchers, etc.), but rather provides the tools for experts to encode different views as science progresses.ConclusionsOpenBiodiv-O provides a conceptual model of the structure of a biodiversity publication and the development of related taxonomic concepts. It also serves as the basis for the OpenBiodiv Knowledge Management System.

[1]  Sujeevan Ratnasingham,et al.  A DNA-Based Registry for All Animal Species: The Barcode Index Number (BIN) System , 2013, PloS one.

[2]  Meetings , 1891, Bristol Medico-Chirurgical Journal (1883).

[3]  Donald E. Knuth,et al.  Literate Programming , 1984, Comput. J..

[4]  W. John Kress,et al.  Fast, linked, and open – the future of taxonomic publishing for plants: launching the journal PhytoKeys , 2010, PhytoKeys.

[5]  D J Patterson,et al.  Names are key to the big new biology. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[6]  Martin Doerr,et al.  Integrating Heterogeneous and Distributed Information about Marine Species through a Top Level Ontology , 2013, MTSR.

[7]  Barry Smith,et al.  Semantics in Support of Biodiversity Knowledge Discovery: An Introduction to the Biological Collections Ontology and Related Ontologies , 2014, PloS one.

[8]  David Remsen,et al.  The use and limits of scientific names in biological informatics , 2016, ZooKeys.

[9]  Richard L Pyle,et al.  Towards a Global Names Architecture: The future of indexing scientific names , 2016, ZooKeys.

[10]  Silvio Peroni,et al.  The Semantic Publishing and Referencing Ontologies , 2014 .

[11]  Stephen T. Garnett,et al.  Taxonomy anarchy hampers conservation , 2017, Nature.

[12]  R. Peet,et al.  Perspectives: Towards a language for mapping relationships among taxonomic concepts , 2009 .

[13]  Guanyang Zhang,et al.  Three new species of entimine weevils in Early Miocene amber from the Dominican Republic (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) , 2017, Biodiversity data journal.

[14]  J. Poorani,et al.  Harmonia manillana (Mulsant), a new addition to Indian Coccinellidae, with changes in synonymy , 2016, Biodiversity data journal.

[15]  H. L. Blomquist The grasses of North Carolina , 1949 .

[16]  Stephen E. Thorpe Casuarinicola australis Taylor, 2010 (Hemiptera: Triozidae), newly recorded from New Zealand , 2013, Biodiversity data journal.

[17]  Walter G. Berendsohn,et al.  The concept of "potential taxa" in databases , 1995 .

[18]  Bertram Ludäscher,et al.  Names are not good enough: Reasoning over taxonomic change in the Andropogon complex , 2016, Semantic Web.

[19]  Peroni Silvio Example of use of DoCO #2 , 2015 .

[20]  Steffen Staab,et al.  International Handbooks on Information Systems , 2013 .

[21]  A. Austin,et al.  Casuarinicola, a new genus of jumping plant lice (Hemiptera: Triozidae) from Casuarina (Casuarinaceae). , 2010 .

[22]  Nico M. Franz,et al.  Phylogenetic revision of Minyomerus Horn, 1876 sec. Jansen & Franz, 2015 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) using taxonomic concept annotations and alignments , 2015, ZooKeys.

[23]  Bertram Ludäscher,et al.  Two Influential Primate Classifications Logically Aligned , 2016, Systematic biology.

[24]  Florence March,et al.  2016 , 2016, Affair of the Heart.

[25]  Nico M. Franz,et al.  Taxonomy for Humans or Computers? Cognitive Pragmatics for Big Data , 2017, Biological Theory.

[26]  Torsten Dikow,et al.  Beyond dead trees: integrating the scientific process in the Biodiversity Data Journal , 2013, Biodiversity data journal.

[27]  Silvio Peroni Semantic Web Technologies and Legal Scholarly Publishing , 2014 .

[28]  Norman I. Platnick From Cladograms to Classifications : The Road to DePhylocode , 2002 .

[29]  P. Stevens,et al.  History of Taxonomy , 2003 .

[30]  Fabio Vitali,et al.  The Document Components Ontology (DoCO) , 2016, Semantic Web.

[31]  Trevor Paterson,et al.  Scientific Names Are Ambiguous as Identifiers for Biological Taxa: Their Context and Definition Are Required for Accurate Data Integration , 2005, DILS.

[32]  J. Witteveen,et al.  Naming and contingency: the type method of biological taxonomy , 2015 .

[33]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[34]  Silvio Peroni,et al.  FaBiO and CiTO: Ontologies for describing bibliographic resources and citations , 2012, J. Web Semant..

[35]  Michael Weiss,et al.  Towards a unified paradigm for sequence‐based identification of fungi , 2013, Molecular ecology.

[36]  Lyubomir Penev,et al.  The Open Biodiversity Knowledge Management System in Scholarly Publishing , 2016 .

[37]  Barend Mons,et al.  Open PHACTS: semantic interoperability for drug discovery. , 2012, Drug discovery today.

[38]  Gaurav Vaidya,et al.  Avibase – a database system for managing and organizing taxonomic concepts , 2014, ZooKeys.

[39]  Barbara Tillett,et al.  What is FRBR? A conceptual model for the bibliographic universe , 2005 .

[40]  D. Rebholz-Schuhmann,et al.  Facts from Text—Is Text Mining Ready to Deliver? , 2005, PLoS biology.

[41]  Bertram Ludäscher,et al.  Euler/X: A Toolkit for Logic-based Taxonomy Integration , 2013, WFLP 2013.

[42]  Roderic D. M. Page,et al.  Towards a biodiversity knowledge graph , 2016 .

[43]  Steven J. Baskauf,et al.  Darwin-SW: Darwin Core-based terms for expressing biodiversity data as RDF , 2016, Semantic Web.

[44]  Sophia Ananiadou,et al.  Constructing a biodiversity terminological inventory , 2017, PloS one.

[45]  Nico M. Franz,et al.  A Logic Approach to Modeling Nomenclatural Change , 2016, bioRxiv.

[46]  S. Berlocher,et al.  Species Concepts , 2014 .

[47]  Fengqiong Huang,et al.  OTO: Ontology Term Organizer , 2015, BMC Bioinformatics.

[48]  Roderic D M Page,et al.  DNA barcoding and taxonomy: dark taxa and dark texts , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  Robert R. Sokal,et al.  THE PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF NUMERICAL TAXONOMY , 1963 .

[50]  J. Balhoff,et al.  Time to change how we describe biodiversity. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[51]  Carl von Linné Systema Naturae: Per Regna Tria Naturae, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, Cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis, , 2011 .

[52]  Terence Catapano,et al.  TaxPub: An Extension of the NLM/NCBI Journal Publishing DTD for Taxonomic Descriptions , 2010 .

[53]  Cene Fišer,et al.  Perspectives: Cryptic species diversity should not be trivialised , 2009 .

[54]  P. Kirk,et al.  International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code) , 2012 .

[55]  John Wieczorek,et al.  Darwin Core: An Evolving Community-Developed Biodiversity Data Standard , 2012, PloS one.

[56]  Mariana Damova,et al.  Mapping the central LOD ontologies to PROTON upper-level ontology , 2010, OM.