Similarities in the evolution of plants and cars

While one system is animate and the other inanimate, both plants and cars are powered by a highly successful process which has evolved in a changing environment. Each process (the photosynthetic pathway and the car engine, respectively) originated from a basic scheme and evolved greater efficiency by adding components to the existing structure, which has remained largely unchanged. Here we present a comparative analysis of two variants on the original C3 photosynthetic pathway (C4 and CAM) and two variants on the internal combustion engine (the turbocharger and the hybrid electric vehicle). We compare the timeline of evolution, the interaction between system components, and the effects of environmental conditions on both systems. This analysis reveals striking similarities in the development of these processes, providing insight as to how complex systems—both natural and built—evolve and adapt to changing environmental conditions in a modular fashion.

[1]  J. Berry,et al.  A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species , 1980, Planta.

[2]  Hod Lipson,et al.  ON THE ORIGIN OF MODULAR VARIATION , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  J. Hopfield,et al.  From molecular to modular cell biology , 1999, Nature.

[4]  Christopher C. Moser,et al.  Natural engineering principles of electron tunnelling in biological oxidation–reduction , 1999, Nature.

[5]  Kaushik Rajashekara,et al.  Power Electronics and Motor Drives in Electric, Hybrid Electric, and Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[6]  R. Monson,et al.  Evolutionary and Ecological Aspects of Photosynthetic Pathway Variation , 1993 .

[7]  Francesco Castelli-Dezza,et al.  Multi-objective Optimal Sizing and Energy Management of Hybrid Energy Storage System for Electric Vehicles , 2018, ArXiv.

[8]  A. S. Raghavendra,et al.  The impact of global elevated CO2 concentration on photosynthesis and plant productivity , 2010 .

[9]  Thomas Johansson,et al.  Advanced Automobile Engines for Fuel Economy, Low Emissions, and Multifuel Capability , 1989 .

[10]  Kai F. Müller,et al.  The evolution of the plastid chromosome in land plants: gene content, gene order, gene function , 2011, Plant Molecular Biology.

[11]  P. Reich,et al.  Unexpected reversal of C3 versus C4 grass response to elevated CO2 during a 20-year field experiment , 2018, Science.

[12]  S. Long,et al.  Food for Thought: Lower-Than-Expected Crop Yield Stimulation with Rising CO2 Concentrations , 2006, Science.

[13]  U. Alon,et al.  Environmental variability and modularity of bacterial metabolic networks , 2007, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[14]  Mehrdad Ehsani,et al.  Hybrid Electric Vehicles: Architecture and Motor Drives , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[15]  W. Whitman,et al.  Prokaryotes: the unseen majority. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  A. Bejan,et al.  The constructal law and the evolution of design in nature. , 2011, Physics of life reviews.

[17]  A. Schäfer,et al.  The future mobility of the world population , 2000 .

[18]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  Ecohydrology of water-controlled ecosystems , 2004 .

[19]  Zongfu Yu,et al.  Measurement of time-dependent CP asymmetries in Bjavax.xml.bind.JAXBElement@6d610b0 → D(*)±π± decays and constraints on sin(2β + γ) , 2004 .

[20]  R. Bungard,et al.  Photosynthetic evolution in parasitic plants: insight from the chloroplast genome , 2004, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[21]  U. Alon,et al.  Spontaneous evolution of modularity and network motifs. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  A. Porporato,et al.  Nonlinear dynamics of the CAM circadian rhythm in response to environmental forcing. , 2015, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  J. A. Smith,et al.  Crassulacean acid metabolism : biochemistry, ecophysiology, and evolution , 1996 .

[24]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Climate change and the evolution of C(4) photosynthesis. , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  Robert W. Pearcy,et al.  Plant Physiological Ecology , 1989, Springer Netherlands.

[26]  Alex M. K. P. Taylor,et al.  Science review of internal combustion engines , 2008 .

[27]  Coupled carbon and water fluxes in CAM photosynthesis: modeling quantification of water use efficiency and productivity , 2014, Plant and Soil.

[28]  J. Keeley,et al.  Evolution of CAM and C4 Carbon‐Concentrating Mechanisms , 2003, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[29]  L. Ziska,et al.  Comment on “Unexpected reversal of C3 versus C4 grass response to elevated CO2 during a 20-year field experiment” , 2018, Science.

[30]  C. Bauer,et al.  Complex evolution of photosynthesis. , 2003, Annual review of plant biology.

[31]  J. Van Mierlo,et al.  Which energy source for road transport in the future? A comparison of battery, hybrid and fuel cell vehicles , 2006 .

[32]  Zhenpo Wang,et al.  Multiobjective Optimal Sizing of Hybrid Energy Storage System for Electric Vehicles , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[33]  Raymond L. Lowrie SME mining reference handbook , 2002 .

[34]  David A. Howey,et al.  Policy: A challenging future for cars , 2012 .

[35]  Karen Schlauch,et al.  A roadmap for research on crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) to enhance sustainable food and bioenergy production in a hotter, drier world. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[36]  P. Nobel Responses of some North American CAM plants to freezing temperatures and doubled CO2concentrations: implications of global climate change for extending cultivation , 1996 .

[37]  James S. Clark,et al.  Effects of climate and atmospheric CO2 partial pressure on the global distribution of C4 grasses: present, past, and future , 1998, Oecologia.

[38]  Judy Anderson,et al.  Electric and Hybrid Cars: A History , 2004 .

[39]  A. Porporato,et al.  Unified representation of the C3, C4, and CAM photosynthetic pathways with the Photo3 model , 2018, Ecological Modelling.

[40]  J. OfferG. Comparative analysis of battery electric, hydrogen fuel cell and hybrid vehicles in a future sustainable road transport system , 2009 .

[41]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Networks, dynamics, and modularity. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[42]  Xiaolin Tang,et al.  A novel simplified model for torsional vibration analysis of a series-parallel hybrid electric vehicle , 2017 .

[43]  L. Sweetlove,et al.  Computational analysis of the productivity potential of CAM , 2018, Nature Plants.