A three-way VOT contrast in final position: data from Armenian

Standard Eastern Armenian has a three-way VOT contrast among its oral stop series. While it is rare for such a 3-way contrast to be preserved in final position, Standard Eastern Armenian is claimed to do just this (Khachaturian 1988; Ladefoged & Maddieson 1996; Vaux 1998). This phenomenon provides an ideal opportunity to explore how prosodic structure influences the realization of a complex and delicate system of contrast maintained by temporal and saliency distinctions. The cues to this contrast, including VOT, closure duration, and burst amplitude, are examined in a variety of segmental and prosodic environments. The experiment evaluates effects of intonation phrase final, intermediate phrase final, word final, and syllable final positions. We find that the 3-way VOT contrast is maintained in those prosodic domains in which the stop consonants are final. Speakers make significant VOT distinctions among the target consonants within the same boundary condition, and across prosodic conditions, larger prosodic domains exhibit longer VOT values.

[1]  Cécile Fougeron,et al.  Articulatory properties of initial segments in several prosodic constituents in French , 2001, J. Phonetics.

[2]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Articulatory and acoustic studies on domain-initial strengthening in Korean , 2001, J. Phonetics.

[3]  B. Vaux.  The phonology of Armenian , 1998 .

[4]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Intonational structure in Japanese and English , 1986, Phonology.

[5]  C Henton,et al.  Stops in the World’s Languages , 1992, Phonetica.

[6]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Domain-initial strengthening as enhancement of laryngeal features: Aerodynamic evidence from Korean , 2000 .

[7]  Ian Maddieson,et al.  Patterns of sounds , 1986 .

[8]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[9]  M. Beckman,et al.  Gesture, Segment, Prosody: Prosodic structure and tempo in a sonority model of articulatory dynamics , 1992 .

[10]  Jongho Jun,et al.  Perceptual and articulatory factors in place assimilation : an optimality theoretic approach , 1995 .

[11]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[12]  Robert Kirchner,et al.  Contrastiveness is an Epiphenomenon of Constraint Ranking , 1995 .

[13]  D. Steriade.  Phonetics in Phonology: The Case of Laryngeal Neutralization , 1999 .

[14]  W. S. Allen.  NOTES ON THE PHONETICS OF AN EASTERN ARMENIAN SPEAKER , 1950 .

[15]  Sun-Ah Jun,et al.  Phonology and Phonetic Evidence: Asymmetrical prosodic effects on the laryngeal gesture in Korean , 1995 .

[16]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Domain-initial articulatory strengthening in four languages , 2003 .

[17]  Jill Beckman.  Positional faithfulness, positional neutralisation and Shona vowel harmony , 1997, Phonology.

[18]  P. Keating,et al.  Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Robert Kirchner,et al.  Contrastiveness and faithfulness , 1997, Phonology.

[20]  Janet Pierrehumbert,et al.  Gesture, Segment, Prosody: Lenition of |h| and glottal stop , 1992 .

[21]  Colin W. Wightman,et al.  Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.