Tissue Damage by Pulsed Electrical Stimulation

Repeated pulsed electrical stimulation is used in a multitude of neural interfaces; damage resulting from such stimulation was studied as a function of pulse duration, electrode size, and number of pulses using a fluorescent assay on chick chorioallontoic membrane (CAM) in vivo and chick retina in vitro. Data from the chick model were verified by repeating some measurements on porcine retina in-vitro. The electrode size varied from 100 mum to 1 mm, pulse duration from 6 mus to 6 ms, and the number of pulses from 1 to 7500. The threshold current density for damage was independent of electrode size for diameters greater than 300 mum, and scaled as 1/r2 for electrodes smaller than 200 mum. Damage threshold decreased with the number of pulses, dropping by a factor of 14 on the CAM and 7 on the retina as the number of pulses increased from 1 to 50, and remained constant for a higher numbers of pulses. The damage threshold current density on large electrodes scaled with pulse duration as approximately 1/t0.5, characteristic of electroporation. The threshold current density for repeated exposure on the retina varied between 0.061 A/cm2 at 6 ms to 1.3 A/cm2 at 6 mus. The highest ratio of the damage threshold to the stimulation threshold in retinal ganglion cells occurred at pulse durations near chronaxie - around 1.3 ms.

[1]  R.V. Shannon,et al.  A model of safe levels for electrical stimulation , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Daniel Palanker,et al.  Electrical alternative to pulsed fiber-delivered lasers in microsurgery , 1997 .

[3]  Manjunatha Mahadevappa,et al.  Assessment of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness by Use of Optical Coherence Tomography and Retinal Dichroïsm Measurement: Preliminary Study , 2003 .

[4]  T. Dalkara,et al.  Intravenously administered propidium iodide labels necrotic cells in the intact mouse brain after injury , 2003, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[5]  E. Neumann,et al.  Membrane electroporation and direct gene transfer , 1992 .

[6]  D.B. McCreery,et al.  Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  B Rosner,et al.  Vitamin A supplementation for retinitis pigmentosa. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.

[8]  Walter F. Boron,et al.  Use of BCECF and propidium iodide to assess membrane integrity of acutely isolated CA1 neurons from rat hippocampus , 1995, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[9]  F Lacombe,et al.  A flow cytometric method using Hoechst 33342 and propidium iodide for simultaneous cell cycle analysis and apoptosis determination in unfixed cells. , 1994, Cytometry.

[10]  B. Roth.  Mechanisms for electrical stimulation of excitable tissue. , 1994, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[11]  A. Milam,et al.  Preservation of the inner retina in retinitis pigmentosa. A morphometric analysis. , 1997, Archives of ophthalmology.

[12]  K. Schoenbach,et al.  The effects of intense submicrosecond electrical pulses on cells. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[13]  R. Granit.  THE HEART ( Extract from “ Principles and Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields , 2005 .

[14]  Joseph F. Rizzo,et al.  Ocular implants for the blind , 1996 .

[15]  C. Curcio,et al.  Photoreceptor loss in age-related macular degeneration. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  S. M. Wu,et al.  Response sensitivity and voltage gain of the rod- and cone-bipolar cell synapses in dark-adapted tiger salamander retina. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Kalayaan V. Bilbao,et al.  THE CHICK CHORIOALLANTOIC MEMBRANE AS A MODEL TISSUE FOR SURGICAL RETINAL RESEARCH AND SIMULATION , 2004, Retina.

[18]  J. Weiland,et al.  Perceptual thresholds and electrode impedance in three retinal prosthesis subjects , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  R. H. Propst,et al.  Visual perception elicited by electrical stimulation of retina in blind humans. , 1996, Archives of ophthalmology.

[20]  E. Zrenner,et al.  Subretinal electrical stimulation of the rabbit retina with acutely implanted electrode arrays , 2004, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[21]  R. Jensen,et al.  Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with relatively large, extracellular microelectrodes. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  D Burke,et al.  Strength-duration properties of human peripheral nerve. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  Robert Plonsey,et al.  Bioelectromagnetism: Principles and Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields , 1995 .

[24]  J. L. Stone,et al.  Morphometric analysis of macular photoreceptors and ganglion cells in retinas with retinitis pigmentosa. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[25]  B.J. Roth,et al.  A mathematical model of make and break electrical stimulation of cardiac tissue by a unipolar anode or cathode , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  V. Celli,et al.  Understanding the Degradation of Organic Coatings Through Local Electrochemical Impedance Methods II. Modeling and Experimental Results of Normal Field Variations above Disk Electrodes , 2003 .

[27]  D. J. Warren,et al.  A neural interface for a cortical vision prosthesis , 1999, Vision Research.

[28]  Hiroshi Asanuma,et al.  Noxious effects of excessive currents used for intracortical microstimulation , 1975, Brain Research.

[29]  E Neumann,et al.  Perspectives for microelectrode arrays for biosensing and membrane electroporation. , 2000, Bioelectrochemistry.

[30]  Joseph F Rizzo,et al.  Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with an ultrafine, extracellular microelectrode. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[31]  F. Iannotti,et al.  Propidium iodide in vivo: an early marker of neuronal damage in rat hippocampus , 1994, Neuroscience Letters.

[32]  W. Faulk,et al.  Propidium iodide as a nuclear marker in immunofluorescence. II. Use with cellular identification and viability studies. , 1981, Journal of immunological methods.

[33]  I. Efimov,et al.  Virtual electrode theory explains pacing threshold increase caused by cardiac tissue damage. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[34]  Joseph F. Rizzo,et al.  Subretinal Placement of the Microelectrode Array is Associated With a Low Threshold for Electrical Stimualtion , 2005 .

[35]  A. Berntson,et al.  Response characteristics and receptive field widths of on‐bipolar cells in the mouse retina , 2000, The Journal of physiology.